Good practices for humanization in pediatric intensive care units: a national Delphi consensus study.

IF 4.7
Javier García-Fernández, Pilar Delgado-Hito, Llúcia Benito-Aracil, Marta Romero-García
{"title":"Good practices for humanization in pediatric intensive care units: a national Delphi consensus study.","authors":"Javier García-Fernández, Pilar Delgado-Hito, Llúcia Benito-Aracil, Marta Romero-García","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To adapt and validate a good practice manual on humanisation, originally designed for adult critical care patients, to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A methodological study to adapt and validate a clinical practice manual was conducted using a three-round Delphi consensus technique between February and October 2023 with 53 experts (56.6 % nurses, 28.3 % physicians, 15.1 % other professionals) from 15 Spanish hospitals. In the first round, participants evaluated 160 practices from the Manual of Good Practices in Humanization for Adult Intensive Care Units (HU-CI Project) and adapted them to the paediatric context. In the second round, they validated these modifications and 30 additional proposals. In the third round, the consensus practices were classified into three levels. Consensus was defined as ≥75 % agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 57 initial participants, 53 completed the three Delphi rounds, resulting in a 93 % retention rate. Among participants, 79.2 % were women, 56.6 % were nurses, and 94.4 % had experience in PICUs. From the original 160 initial practices, 47.4% (n = 76) reached consensus without modification, 16.9 % (n = 27) were modified, and 35.6 % (n = 57) were discarded. Additionally, 30 new practices were proposed and accepted, resulting in 132 final practices. These were categorised as basic (65 %, n = 86), advanced (22 %, n = 29), and excellent (13 %, n = 17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study adapted and validated the first humanisation manual specifically for PICUs, providing a structured, measurable framework that may promote child- and family-centred care and support continuous quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Implications for clinical practice: </strong>The consensus-validated practices provide PICU teams with a structured, measurable framework that may help promote child- and family-centred care. Nursing staff play a key role in daily implementation of family involvement, communication, and comfort measures, whilst the three-level classification allows progressive evaluation of PICU humanisation according to unit resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":94043,"journal":{"name":"Intensive & critical care nursing","volume":" ","pages":"104247"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive & critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To adapt and validate a good practice manual on humanisation, originally designed for adult critical care patients, to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) context.

Methods: A methodological study to adapt and validate a clinical practice manual was conducted using a three-round Delphi consensus technique between February and October 2023 with 53 experts (56.6 % nurses, 28.3 % physicians, 15.1 % other professionals) from 15 Spanish hospitals. In the first round, participants evaluated 160 practices from the Manual of Good Practices in Humanization for Adult Intensive Care Units (HU-CI Project) and adapted them to the paediatric context. In the second round, they validated these modifications and 30 additional proposals. In the third round, the consensus practices were classified into three levels. Consensus was defined as ≥75 % agreement.

Results: Of 57 initial participants, 53 completed the three Delphi rounds, resulting in a 93 % retention rate. Among participants, 79.2 % were women, 56.6 % were nurses, and 94.4 % had experience in PICUs. From the original 160 initial practices, 47.4% (n = 76) reached consensus without modification, 16.9 % (n = 27) were modified, and 35.6 % (n = 57) were discarded. Additionally, 30 new practices were proposed and accepted, resulting in 132 final practices. These were categorised as basic (65 %, n = 86), advanced (22 %, n = 29), and excellent (13 %, n = 17).

Conclusions: This study adapted and validated the first humanisation manual specifically for PICUs, providing a structured, measurable framework that may promote child- and family-centred care and support continuous quality improvement.

Implications for clinical practice: The consensus-validated practices provide PICU teams with a structured, measurable framework that may help promote child- and family-centred care. Nursing staff play a key role in daily implementation of family involvement, communication, and comfort measures, whilst the three-level classification allows progressive evaluation of PICU humanisation according to unit resources.

儿童重症监护病房人性化的良好实践:一项全国德尔菲共识研究。
目的:调整和验证人性化良好实践手册,最初是为成人重症监护患者设计的,适用于儿科重症监护病房(PICU)。方法:对来自西班牙15家医院的53名专家(56.6%的护士,28.3%的医生,15.1%的其他专业人员)于2023年2月至10月采用三轮德尔菲共识技术进行了一项方法学研究,以适应和验证临床实践手册。在第一轮中,参与者评估了《成人重症监护病房人性化良好做法手册》(HU-CI项目)中的160项做法,并使其适应儿科情况。在第二轮中,他们验证了这些修改和另外30个建议。在第三轮中,共识实践被划分为三个层次。一致定义为≥75%的同意。结果:在57名初始参与者中,53人完成了3轮德尔菲,导致93%的保留率。参与者中79.2%为女性,56.6%为护士,94.4%有picu护理经验。在最初的160例初始实践中,47.4% (n = 76)的实践在未修改的情况下达成共识,16.9% (n = 27)的实践被修改,35.6% (n = 57)的实践被丢弃。此外,提出并接受了30个新的实践,最终形成132个实践。这些患者被分为基本(65%,n = 86)、高级(22%,n = 29)和优秀(13%,n = 17)。结论:本研究改编并验证了第一本专门针对picu的人性化手册,提供了一个结构化的、可衡量的框架,可以促进以儿童和家庭为中心的护理,并支持持续的质量改进。对临床实践的启示:经共识验证的实践为PICU团队提供了一个结构化的、可衡量的框架,可能有助于促进以儿童和家庭为中心的护理。护理人员在家庭参与、沟通和舒适措施的日常实施中发挥关键作用,而三级分类允许根据单位资源逐步评估PICU的人性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信