7T MRI Automated Software Segmentation of the Hippocampus for Epilepsy: Prospective Performance Evaluation.

Brian J Burkett, Andrew J Fagan, Krystal M Kirby, Zaki Ahmed, Benjamin H Brinkmann, Daniel J Blezek, David B Burkholder, Karl N Krecke, Steven A Messina, Robert J Witte, Kirk M Welker
{"title":"7T MRI Automated Software Segmentation of the Hippocampus for Epilepsy: Prospective Performance Evaluation.","authors":"Brian J Burkett, Andrew J Fagan, Krystal M Kirby, Zaki Ahmed, Benjamin H Brinkmann, Daniel J Blezek, David B Burkholder, Karl N Krecke, Steven A Messina, Robert J Witte, Kirk M Welker","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>7T MRI is a promising clinical technology for epilepsy imaging. Quantification of hippocampus volume on MRI is a clinically useful biomarker in epilepsy. Applying automated hippocampus volume measurement tools to 7T MRI is needed to optimize the use of clinical ultra-high-field strength epilepsy imaging. The objective of this study is a performance evaluation of automated hippocampal volume measurement software at 7T MRI in both normal participants and those with seizure disorders.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>7T MRI examinations were prospectively acquired in 50 participants. A subset of participants also underwent 3T MRI examinations, and a subset underwent 2 separate 7T acquisitions. Automated segmentation of the hippocampus was performed with 2 commonly used software packages (FreeSurfer and NeuroQuant) at 3T and 7T, with hippocampal volumes calculated for segmentations without any visually unacceptable errors as determined by radiologist review. Hippocampal volumes were also measured from manual segmentations, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare data with automated segmentation volumes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visually unacceptable automated hippocampus segmentation errors occurred more frequently at 7T than at 3T with NeuroQuant (11.0% versus 7.14%) and FreeSurfer (12.5% versus 0%). Computerized volume measurements at 7T correlated poorly with manual segmentation for both software programs (ICC <0.4). Hippocampal volume estimate correlation between matched 7T and 3T MRI in the same participant was fair (ICC = 0.4-0.59) to good (0.6-0.75) for software and manual segmentation. For repeated 7T MRI examinations in the same participant, hippocampus segmentation reproducibility was excellent (0.75) for automated software but poor (< 0.4) for manual segmentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Computerized volume measurement of the hippocampus at 7T correlates poorly with volumes obtained through manual segmentation and suboptimally with matched 3T examination measurements, but is highly reproducible at 7T within the same participant. Segmentation errors are more common with 7T examinations, and further development of a hippocampal segmentation method specific to 7T MRI is needed to fully realize the benefits of 7T MRI for imaging patients with epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: 7T MRI is a promising clinical technology for epilepsy imaging. Quantification of hippocampus volume on MRI is a clinically useful biomarker in epilepsy. Applying automated hippocampus volume measurement tools to 7T MRI is needed to optimize the use of clinical ultra-high-field strength epilepsy imaging. The objective of this study is a performance evaluation of automated hippocampal volume measurement software at 7T MRI in both normal participants and those with seizure disorders.

Materials and methods: 7T MRI examinations were prospectively acquired in 50 participants. A subset of participants also underwent 3T MRI examinations, and a subset underwent 2 separate 7T acquisitions. Automated segmentation of the hippocampus was performed with 2 commonly used software packages (FreeSurfer and NeuroQuant) at 3T and 7T, with hippocampal volumes calculated for segmentations without any visually unacceptable errors as determined by radiologist review. Hippocampal volumes were also measured from manual segmentations, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare data with automated segmentation volumes.

Results: Visually unacceptable automated hippocampus segmentation errors occurred more frequently at 7T than at 3T with NeuroQuant (11.0% versus 7.14%) and FreeSurfer (12.5% versus 0%). Computerized volume measurements at 7T correlated poorly with manual segmentation for both software programs (ICC <0.4). Hippocampal volume estimate correlation between matched 7T and 3T MRI in the same participant was fair (ICC = 0.4-0.59) to good (0.6-0.75) for software and manual segmentation. For repeated 7T MRI examinations in the same participant, hippocampus segmentation reproducibility was excellent (0.75) for automated software but poor (< 0.4) for manual segmentation.

Conclusions: Computerized volume measurement of the hippocampus at 7T correlates poorly with volumes obtained through manual segmentation and suboptimally with matched 3T examination measurements, but is highly reproducible at 7T within the same participant. Segmentation errors are more common with 7T examinations, and further development of a hippocampal segmentation method specific to 7T MRI is needed to fully realize the benefits of 7T MRI for imaging patients with epilepsy.

7T MRI自动软件分割癫痫海马:前瞻性性能评价。
背景与目的:7T MRI是一种很有前途的癫痫临床成像技术。MRI上海马体积的量化是临床上有用的癫痫生物标志物。需要将自动海马体积测量工具应用于7T MRI,以优化临床超高场强癫痫成像的使用。本研究的目的是在7T MRI上对正常参与者和癫痫患者的自动海马体积测量软件进行性能评估。材料和方法:前瞻性获得50例受试者7T MRI检查。一部分参与者还接受了3T MRI检查,另一部分进行了2次单独的7T采集。使用两种常用的软件包(FreeSurfer和NeuroQuant)在3T和7T时对海马进行自动分割,根据放射科医生的检查,计算分割时的海马体积,没有任何视觉上不可接受的错误。通过人工分割测量海马体积,并使用类内相关系数(ICC)与自动分割体积进行比较。结果:使用NeuroQuant(11.0%比7.14%)和FreeSurfer(12.5%比0%),视觉上不可接受的自动海马分割错误在7T时比在3T时发生的频率更高。在这两种软件程序中,7T的计算机体积测量与人工分割的相关性很差(ICC结论:7T海马的计算机体积测量与人工分割获得的体积相关性很差,与匹配的3T检查测量的相关性不佳,但在同一参与者中,7T的可重复性很高。7T检查的分割错误更为常见,需要进一步开发针对7T MRI的海马分割方法,以充分发挥7T MRI对癫痫患者成像的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信