Impact of implant surface modifications on long-term outcome of surgical peri-implantitis treatment: a systematic review.

IF 1.8 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Frontiers in dental medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdmed.2025.1661369
Panagiotis Gardelis, Catherine Giannopoulou, Andreas Stavropoulos, Alkisti Zekeridou
{"title":"Impact of implant surface modifications on long-term outcome of surgical peri-implantitis treatment: a systematic review.","authors":"Panagiotis Gardelis, Catherine Giannopoulou, Andreas Stavropoulos, Alkisti Zekeridou","doi":"10.3389/fdmed.2025.1661369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory disease that compromises peri-implant tissues and supporting bone, potentially leading to implant loss. Although several surgical treatment strategies have been proposed, it remains unclear whether implant surface characteristics (smooth vs. rough) influence long-term treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted to evaluate clinical studies with a minimum follow-up of 3 years that assessed the outcomes of surgical treatment of peri-implantitis in relation to implant surface type. Data extraction focused on recurrence of peri-implantitis, implant survival, clinical parameters, radiographic outcomes, and the type of surgical approach used (reconstructive vs. non-reconstructive).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen clinical studies were included. Outcomes varied according to implant surface characteristics. Rough (modified) surfaces were generally associated with a higher risk of recurrence of peri-implantitis and implant loss compared with smooth (machined/turned) surfaces. Reconstructive surgical approaches, especially those involving bone grafts and membranes, demonstrated more favorable outcomes compared with non-reconstructive approaches.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite observed trends, the certainty of the evidence remains low due to heterogeneity between studies, small sample sizes, and methodological limitations. Further well-designed long-term clinical trials are needed to clarify the role of implant surface characteristics in the long-term success of peri-implantitis surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD420251129791).</p>","PeriodicalId":73077,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dental medicine","volume":"6 ","pages":"1661369"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2025.1661369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory disease that compromises peri-implant tissues and supporting bone, potentially leading to implant loss. Although several surgical treatment strategies have been proposed, it remains unclear whether implant surface characteristics (smooth vs. rough) influence long-term treatment outcomes.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate clinical studies with a minimum follow-up of 3 years that assessed the outcomes of surgical treatment of peri-implantitis in relation to implant surface type. Data extraction focused on recurrence of peri-implantitis, implant survival, clinical parameters, radiographic outcomes, and the type of surgical approach used (reconstructive vs. non-reconstructive).

Results: Seventeen clinical studies were included. Outcomes varied according to implant surface characteristics. Rough (modified) surfaces were generally associated with a higher risk of recurrence of peri-implantitis and implant loss compared with smooth (machined/turned) surfaces. Reconstructive surgical approaches, especially those involving bone grafts and membranes, demonstrated more favorable outcomes compared with non-reconstructive approaches.

Discussion: Despite observed trends, the certainty of the evidence remains low due to heterogeneity between studies, small sample sizes, and methodological limitations. Further well-designed long-term clinical trials are needed to clarify the role of implant surface characteristics in the long-term success of peri-implantitis surgical treatment.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (CRD420251129791).

Abstract Image

种植体表面修饰对手术治疗种植体周围炎长期疗效的影响:一项系统综述。
简介:种植体周围炎是一种损害种植体周围组织和支撑骨的炎症性疾病,可能导致种植体丢失。虽然已经提出了几种手术治疗策略,但尚不清楚种植体表面特征(光滑与粗糙)是否会影响长期治疗结果。方法:系统回顾了至少3年随访的临床研究,评估了手术治疗种植体周围炎与种植体表面类型的关系。数据提取的重点是种植体周围炎的复发、种植体存活、临床参数、影像学结果和采用的手术方式(重建与非重建)。结果:纳入17项临床研究。结果因种植体表面特征而异。与光滑(加工/翻转)表面相比,粗糙(修饰)表面通常与种植体周围炎复发和种植体丢失的风险更高相关。与非重建入路相比,重建手术入路,特别是涉及骨移植物和膜的手术入路,显示出更有利的结果。讨论:尽管观察到趋势,但由于研究之间的异质性、小样本量和方法学的局限性,证据的确定性仍然很低。需要进一步精心设计的长期临床试验来阐明种植体表面特征在种植体周围炎手术治疗的长期成功中的作用。系统评价注册:PROSPERO (CRD420251129791)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信