Preferences for long-acting injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis service delivery among male and female sex workers in Uganda: A discrete choice experiment.

IF 2.5
PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-10-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004798
Richard Muhindo, Rachel King, Andrew Mujugira, Whitney Irie, Patience Muwanguzi, Flavia Dhikusooka, Joseph Musaazi, Barbara Castelnuovo
{"title":"Preferences for long-acting injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis service delivery among male and female sex workers in Uganda: A discrete choice experiment.","authors":"Richard Muhindo, Rachel King, Andrew Mujugira, Whitney Irie, Patience Muwanguzi, Flavia Dhikusooka, Joseph Musaazi, Barbara Castelnuovo","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Sub-Saharan Africa, limited data exist on the delivery of injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We explored service delivery preferences for injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) among heterosexual male sex workers (MSWs) and female sex workers (FSWs) in Uganda. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) among HIV-negative sex workers in two high HIV-prevalence Ugandan cities between October and December 2024. Participants selected from alternatives varying by location, waiting time, provider gender, and additional services. A mixed logit model identified the most valued attributes influencing preferences for CAB-LA delivery. We enrolled 251 sex workers (SWs), comprising 52 (20.7%) MSWs. MSWs were more likely to have higher education (26.9% vs 4.5%), while FSWs had been in the industry longer (24 months vs 18 months). PrEP awareness was lower among MSWs than FSWs (86.5% vs. 95.5%, p = 0.027). Overall, 39.4% reported current PrEP use. Injectable PrEP was the most preferred formulation (77.3%), and willingness to use PrEP among non-users was higher in MSWs (67.3% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.001). Regarding service delivery preferences, MSWs and FSWs both prioritized dispensing location (relative importance 81.1% MSWs, 82.9% FSWs) and provision of additional services (10.8% MSWs, 9% FSWs). In contrast, clinic waiting time and provider gender were considered the least important, with both groups assigning them a relative importance of 4%. Nevertheless, the three top-ranked CAB-LA delivery models prioritized access through private pharmacies or clinics with short waiting times, female or peer providers, and integrated health services. The preferred extra services included psychosocial support, cancer screening, and risk reduction counseling. Expanding injectable PrEP through private sector channels may improve access among SWs. Still, implementation research is needed to guide integration of supportive services and SWs' willingness to pay or co-pay for pharmacy or private clinic-based delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 10","pages":"e0004798"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Sub-Saharan Africa, limited data exist on the delivery of injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We explored service delivery preferences for injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) among heterosexual male sex workers (MSWs) and female sex workers (FSWs) in Uganda. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) among HIV-negative sex workers in two high HIV-prevalence Ugandan cities between October and December 2024. Participants selected from alternatives varying by location, waiting time, provider gender, and additional services. A mixed logit model identified the most valued attributes influencing preferences for CAB-LA delivery. We enrolled 251 sex workers (SWs), comprising 52 (20.7%) MSWs. MSWs were more likely to have higher education (26.9% vs 4.5%), while FSWs had been in the industry longer (24 months vs 18 months). PrEP awareness was lower among MSWs than FSWs (86.5% vs. 95.5%, p = 0.027). Overall, 39.4% reported current PrEP use. Injectable PrEP was the most preferred formulation (77.3%), and willingness to use PrEP among non-users was higher in MSWs (67.3% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.001). Regarding service delivery preferences, MSWs and FSWs both prioritized dispensing location (relative importance 81.1% MSWs, 82.9% FSWs) and provision of additional services (10.8% MSWs, 9% FSWs). In contrast, clinic waiting time and provider gender were considered the least important, with both groups assigning them a relative importance of 4%. Nevertheless, the three top-ranked CAB-LA delivery models prioritized access through private pharmacies or clinics with short waiting times, female or peer providers, and integrated health services. The preferred extra services included psychosocial support, cancer screening, and risk reduction counseling. Expanding injectable PrEP through private sector channels may improve access among SWs. Still, implementation research is needed to guide integration of supportive services and SWs' willingness to pay or co-pay for pharmacy or private clinic-based delivery.

乌干达男性和女性性工作者对长效注射艾滋病毒暴露前预防服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
在撒哈拉以南非洲,关于提供可注射艾滋病毒暴露前预防(PrEP)的数据有限。我们探讨了乌干达异性恋男性性工作者(MSWs)和女性性工作者(FSWs)对注射卡波特韦(CAB-LA)的服务提供偏好。我们于2024年10月至12月在两个艾滋病高流行的乌干达城市的hiv阴性性工作者中进行了离散选择实验(DCE)。参与者根据地点、等待时间、提供者性别和附加服务的不同,从备选方案中进行选择。混合logit模型确定了影响CAB-LA交付偏好的最有价值的属性。我们招募了251名性工作者(SWs),其中包括52名msw(20.7%)。msw的受教育程度更高(26.9%对4.5%),而fsw的从业时间更长(24个月对18个月)。城市生活妇女的PrEP意识低于家庭生活妇女(86.5%比95.5%,p = 0.027)。总体而言,39.4%的人报告目前使用PrEP。可注射PrEP是最受欢迎的处方(77.3%),非吸毒者中使用PrEP的意愿更高(67.3%比45.7%,p = 0.001)。在提供服务的偏好方面,都市固体废物及屋宇署署长均优先考虑分配地点(相对重要性分别为81.1%都市固体废物及82.9%屋宇署署长)及提供额外服务(相对重要性分别为10.8%都市固体废物及9%屋宇署署长)。相比之下,诊所等待时间和提供者性别被认为是最不重要的,两组都认为它们的相对重要性为4%。然而,排名前三的CAB-LA提供模式优先考虑通过私人药房或等待时间短的诊所、女性或同行提供者以及综合保健服务提供服务。首选的额外服务包括心理社会支持、癌症筛查和降低风险咨询。通过私营部门渠道扩大可注射PrEP可改善社会服务人员的获取情况。尽管如此,仍需要实施研究来指导支持性服务的整合,以及社会福利工作者支付或共同支付药房或私人诊所分娩的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信