{"title":"Religious Traditions Exhibit Heterogeneous Effects on Vaccination Uptake: A U.S. County-Level Regression Analysis Supporting Tailored Health Outreach.","authors":"Cory Anderson, Shuai Zhou, Guangqing Chi","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether specific religious traditions-rather than just \"religion\" itself-demonstrate significant associations with COVID-19 vaccination rates.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study analyzes county-level COVID-19 vaccination data (2021-2022) matched with religious composition data from the 2020 U.S. Religion Census for six major religious traditions. The analysis uses negative binomial regression to examine how religious adherence is associated with vaccination rates, controlling for other variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Catholic and Mainline Protestant populations showed significant positive associations with vaccination rates (+12.4% and +25.1% respectively), while Evangelical Protestant populations demonstrated significant negative associations (-12.9%). Associations persisted when controlling for other variables, including political ideology, with Republican voting preference emerging as the strongest predictor across all religious traditions (coefficients ranging from -55.6% to -93.7%). Mormon, Black Protestant, and Muslim populations showed no significant associations, including in national and region-specific analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Religious traditions influence preventive health measures through limited but significant group-specific processes. Church-sect positioning partially explains these patterns, with historically culturally-integrated traditions showing greater receptivity to vaccination than those maintaining some cultural tension. Given the contrasts in associations across religious traditions, public health outreach approaches should consider context of specific religious traditions rather than merely approaching \"religion\" as a monolithic variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108139"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108139","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To examine whether specific religious traditions-rather than just "religion" itself-demonstrate significant associations with COVID-19 vaccination rates.
Method: This study analyzes county-level COVID-19 vaccination data (2021-2022) matched with religious composition data from the 2020 U.S. Religion Census for six major religious traditions. The analysis uses negative binomial regression to examine how religious adherence is associated with vaccination rates, controlling for other variables.
Results: Catholic and Mainline Protestant populations showed significant positive associations with vaccination rates (+12.4% and +25.1% respectively), while Evangelical Protestant populations demonstrated significant negative associations (-12.9%). Associations persisted when controlling for other variables, including political ideology, with Republican voting preference emerging as the strongest predictor across all religious traditions (coefficients ranging from -55.6% to -93.7%). Mormon, Black Protestant, and Muslim populations showed no significant associations, including in national and region-specific analyses.
Conclusions: Religious traditions influence preventive health measures through limited but significant group-specific processes. Church-sect positioning partially explains these patterns, with historically culturally-integrated traditions showing greater receptivity to vaccination than those maintaining some cultural tension. Given the contrasts in associations across religious traditions, public health outreach approaches should consider context of specific religious traditions rather than merely approaching "religion" as a monolithic variable.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.