Religious Traditions Exhibit Heterogeneous Effects on Vaccination Uptake: A U.S. County-Level Regression Analysis Supporting Tailored Health Outreach.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cory Anderson, Shuai Zhou, Guangqing Chi
{"title":"Religious Traditions Exhibit Heterogeneous Effects on Vaccination Uptake: A U.S. County-Level Regression Analysis Supporting Tailored Health Outreach.","authors":"Cory Anderson, Shuai Zhou, Guangqing Chi","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether specific religious traditions-rather than just \"religion\" itself-demonstrate significant associations with COVID-19 vaccination rates.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study analyzes county-level COVID-19 vaccination data (2021-2022) matched with religious composition data from the 2020 U.S. Religion Census for six major religious traditions. The analysis uses negative binomial regression to examine how religious adherence is associated with vaccination rates, controlling for other variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Catholic and Mainline Protestant populations showed significant positive associations with vaccination rates (+12.4% and +25.1% respectively), while Evangelical Protestant populations demonstrated significant negative associations (-12.9%). Associations persisted when controlling for other variables, including political ideology, with Republican voting preference emerging as the strongest predictor across all religious traditions (coefficients ranging from -55.6% to -93.7%). Mormon, Black Protestant, and Muslim populations showed no significant associations, including in national and region-specific analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Religious traditions influence preventive health measures through limited but significant group-specific processes. Church-sect positioning partially explains these patterns, with historically culturally-integrated traditions showing greater receptivity to vaccination than those maintaining some cultural tension. Given the contrasts in associations across religious traditions, public health outreach approaches should consider context of specific religious traditions rather than merely approaching \"religion\" as a monolithic variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108139"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108139","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether specific religious traditions-rather than just "religion" itself-demonstrate significant associations with COVID-19 vaccination rates.

Method: This study analyzes county-level COVID-19 vaccination data (2021-2022) matched with religious composition data from the 2020 U.S. Religion Census for six major religious traditions. The analysis uses negative binomial regression to examine how religious adherence is associated with vaccination rates, controlling for other variables.

Results: Catholic and Mainline Protestant populations showed significant positive associations with vaccination rates (+12.4% and +25.1% respectively), while Evangelical Protestant populations demonstrated significant negative associations (-12.9%). Associations persisted when controlling for other variables, including political ideology, with Republican voting preference emerging as the strongest predictor across all religious traditions (coefficients ranging from -55.6% to -93.7%). Mormon, Black Protestant, and Muslim populations showed no significant associations, including in national and region-specific analyses.

Conclusions: Religious traditions influence preventive health measures through limited but significant group-specific processes. Church-sect positioning partially explains these patterns, with historically culturally-integrated traditions showing greater receptivity to vaccination than those maintaining some cultural tension. Given the contrasts in associations across religious traditions, public health outreach approaches should consider context of specific religious traditions rather than merely approaching "religion" as a monolithic variable.

宗教传统对疫苗接种的异质性影响:美国县级回归分析支持量身定制的健康推广。
目的:研究特定的宗教传统(而不仅仅是“宗教”本身)是否与COVID-19疫苗接种率有显著关联。方法:本研究分析了县级COVID-19疫苗接种数据(2021-2022),并将其与2020年美国六大宗教传统的宗教构成数据相匹配。该分析使用负二项回归来检验宗教信仰与疫苗接种率之间的关系,控制了其他变量。结果:天主教和主流新教人群与疫苗接种率呈显著正相关(分别为+12.4%和+25.1%),福音派新教人群与疫苗接种率呈显著负相关(-12.9%)。在控制包括政治意识形态在内的其他变量时,这种关联仍然存在,共和党的投票偏好成为所有宗教传统的最强预测因子(系数范围从-55.6%到-93.7%)。摩门教徒、黑人新教徒和穆斯林人口没有显示出显著的关联,包括在国家和地区的具体分析中。结论:宗教传统通过有限但重要的群体特定过程影响预防保健措施。教会-教派定位部分解释了这些模式,历史文化一体化的传统比那些保持某种文化紧张的传统更容易接受疫苗接种。鉴于不同宗教传统之间关联的差异,公共卫生推广方法应考虑特定宗教传统的背景,而不是仅仅将“宗教”作为一个单一的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信