Improving racial data equity among minority groups in South Carolina using COVID-19 as an example: application of principal components analysis.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fnu Rubaiya, Janet O'Connor, Lyubomir N Kolev, James M Antill, Margaret Iiams, LaNaya A Martin, Chantaezia Z Joseph, Claire Youngblood, Jennifer Almeda-Garrett, Linda E Kelemen
{"title":"Improving racial data equity among minority groups in South Carolina using COVID-19 as an example: application of principal components analysis.","authors":"Fnu Rubaiya, Janet O'Connor, Lyubomir N Kolev, James M Antill, Margaret Iiams, LaNaya A Martin, Chantaezia Z Joseph, Claire Youngblood, Jennifer Almeda-Garrett, Linda E Kelemen","doi":"10.1186/s12963-025-00419-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data inequity occurs when racial and ethnic groups are aggregated during data collection or reporting despite their differences. To demonstrate racial data equity importance, we re-analyzed South Carolina's (SC) census data and COVID-19 case-rate and death-rate distributions according to age, sex, and new combined single and multiracial categories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The new combined single and multiracial categories included individuals who identified as a single race alone (such as American Indian or Alaska Native, AI-AN) with those who identified as more than one race (such as AI-AN and White) regardless of Hispanic or Latino heritage. We compared those distributions to the single race categories using the American Community Survey 2018-2022 and COVID-19 case and death surveillance data, 2020-2023, for SC. We used principal components analysis to test for differences in age-sex distributions between single race alone and new combined single and multiracial categories for each race.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the combined single and multiracial categories, single race alone categories lose information, underestimate the population of younger-aged people of AI-AN, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (NH-OPI) races, and result in COVID-19 case and death rates with extreme values across age groups, particularly for AI-AN and NH-OPI populations. Among AI-AN, certain age groups had different COVID-19 case rate patterns between females and males, but this was explained by race categorization (single race alone vs. combined single and multiracial, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined single and multiracial categories achieve data equity by avoiding data suppression or aggregation of small diverse populations. Differences in COVID-19 case rates across some age groups between females and males may be biased depending on how race is defined. Younger generations are increasingly multiracial and will be underrepresented if only single race categories are used in public health reporting practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":51476,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Metrics","volume":"23 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-025-00419-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data inequity occurs when racial and ethnic groups are aggregated during data collection or reporting despite their differences. To demonstrate racial data equity importance, we re-analyzed South Carolina's (SC) census data and COVID-19 case-rate and death-rate distributions according to age, sex, and new combined single and multiracial categories.

Methods: The new combined single and multiracial categories included individuals who identified as a single race alone (such as American Indian or Alaska Native, AI-AN) with those who identified as more than one race (such as AI-AN and White) regardless of Hispanic or Latino heritage. We compared those distributions to the single race categories using the American Community Survey 2018-2022 and COVID-19 case and death surveillance data, 2020-2023, for SC. We used principal components analysis to test for differences in age-sex distributions between single race alone and new combined single and multiracial categories for each race.

Results: Compared to the combined single and multiracial categories, single race alone categories lose information, underestimate the population of younger-aged people of AI-AN, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (NH-OPI) races, and result in COVID-19 case and death rates with extreme values across age groups, particularly for AI-AN and NH-OPI populations. Among AI-AN, certain age groups had different COVID-19 case rate patterns between females and males, but this was explained by race categorization (single race alone vs. combined single and multiracial, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Combined single and multiracial categories achieve data equity by avoiding data suppression or aggregation of small diverse populations. Differences in COVID-19 case rates across some age groups between females and males may be biased depending on how race is defined. Younger generations are increasingly multiracial and will be underrepresented if only single race categories are used in public health reporting practices.

改善南卡罗来纳州少数族裔群体的种族数据公平——以COVID-19为例:主成分分析的应用
背景:在数据收集或报告过程中,尽管种族和族裔群体存在差异,但仍将其汇总在一起,就会出现数据不平等。为了证明种族数据公平的重要性,我们重新分析了南卡罗来纳州(SC)的人口普查数据以及根据年龄、性别和新的单一和多种族组合类别的COVID-19病例率和死亡率分布。方法:新合并的单一和多种族分类包括那些只被认定为单一种族的人(如美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民,AI-AN)和那些被认定为不止一个种族的人(如AI-AN和白人),无论他们是西班牙裔还是拉丁裔。我们使用2018-2022年美国社区调查和2020-2023年SC的COVID-19病例和死亡监测数据将这些分布与单一种族类别进行了比较。我们使用主成分分析来检验单个种族与每个种族的新合并单一和多种族类别之间的年龄-性别分布差异。结果:与单一和多种族组合分类相比,单一种族单独分类丢失了信息,低估了AI-AN、亚洲人和夏威夷原住民或其他太平洋岛民(NH-OPI)种族的年轻人口,并导致跨年龄组的COVID-19病例和死亡率极值,特别是AI-AN和NH-OPI人群。在AI-AN中,某些年龄组的女性和男性之间存在不同的COVID-19发病率模式,但这可以通过种族分类(单一种族vs单一和多种族联合)来解释。结论:单一和多种族联合分类通过避免数据抑制或聚集小的不同人群来实现数据公平。在某些年龄组中,女性和男性之间的COVID-19病例率差异可能因种族的定义而有所偏差。年轻一代越来越多地是多种族的,如果在公共卫生报告实践中只使用单一种族类别,那么他们的代表性将不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Population Health Metrics
Population Health Metrics PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Metrics aims to advance the science of population health assessment, and welcomes papers relating to concepts, methods, ethics, applications, and summary measures of population health. The journal provides a unique platform for population health researchers to share their findings with the global community. We seek research that addresses the communication of population health measures and policy implications to stakeholders; this includes papers related to burden estimation and risk assessment, and research addressing population health across the full range of development. Population Health Metrics covers a broad range of topics encompassing health state measurement and valuation, summary measures of population health, descriptive epidemiology at the population level, burden of disease and injury analysis, disease and risk factor modeling for populations, and comparative assessment of risks to health at the population level. The journal is also interested in how to use and communicate indicators of population health to reduce disease burden, and the approaches for translating from indicators of population health to health-advancing actions. As a cross-cutting topic of importance, we are particularly interested in inequalities in population health and their measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信