Effect of abdominal drain on surgical site infection undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in adults: a propensity score matching analysis.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Hao Lu, Shikuan Li, Dawei Zhang, Shengqiang Wang, Hairui Liu, Chengzhi Wang, Honghao Peng
{"title":"Effect of abdominal drain on surgical site infection undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in adults: a propensity score matching analysis.","authors":"Hao Lu, Shikuan Li, Dawei Zhang, Shengqiang Wang, Hairui Liu, Chengzhi Wang, Honghao Peng","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-03219-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of abdominal drain on the incidence of surgical site infection undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data of adult patients who were intraoperatively diagnosed with perforated appendicitis and underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between January 2019 and December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether an abdominal drain was placed during surgery, the patients were categorized into an abdominal drain group and a non-abdominal drain group. A total of 128 patients were included, comprising 73 cases in the abdominal drain group and 55 cases in the non-abdominal drain group. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance intergroup differences in clinical features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, the baseline characteristics between the two groups showed no significant differences and were well-balanced (P > 0.05). The abdominal drain group exhibited significantly longer operative time (P = 0.010), duration of postoperative antibiotic use (P < 0.001), and length of stay (P < 0.001). Before matching, the overall surgical site infection (SSI) rates were 27% in the abdominal drain group and 23% in the non-abdominal drain group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (P = 0.61). After matching, the overall SSI rate was 24% in both groups, and the difference remained statistically non-significant (P > 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings do not support routine abdominal drain placement in adults with perforated appendicitis undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy and align with current guideline trends. However, prospective multicenter randomized controlled trials are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03219-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of abdominal drain on the incidence of surgical site infection undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in adults.

Methods: Clinical data of adult patients who were intraoperatively diagnosed with perforated appendicitis and underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between January 2019 and December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether an abdominal drain was placed during surgery, the patients were categorized into an abdominal drain group and a non-abdominal drain group. A total of 128 patients were included, comprising 73 cases in the abdominal drain group and 55 cases in the non-abdominal drain group. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance intergroup differences in clinical features.

Results: After PSM, the baseline characteristics between the two groups showed no significant differences and were well-balanced (P > 0.05). The abdominal drain group exhibited significantly longer operative time (P = 0.010), duration of postoperative antibiotic use (P < 0.001), and length of stay (P < 0.001). Before matching, the overall surgical site infection (SSI) rates were 27% in the abdominal drain group and 23% in the non-abdominal drain group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (P = 0.61). After matching, the overall SSI rate was 24% in both groups, and the difference remained statistically non-significant (P > 0.99).

Conclusion: Our findings do not support routine abdominal drain placement in adults with perforated appendicitis undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy and align with current guideline trends. However, prospective multicenter randomized controlled trials are warranted.

腹腔引流对成人穿孔阑尾炎腹腔镜切除术手术部位感染的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
目的:探讨腹腔引流对成人穿孔阑尾炎腹腔镜切除术手术部位感染发生率的影响。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2024年12月青岛大学附属医院术中诊断为穿孔性阑尾炎并行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的成年患者的临床资料。根据术中是否放置腹腔引流管,将患者分为腹腔引流组和非腹腔引流组。共纳入128例患者,其中腹腔引流组73例,非腹腔引流组55例。收集基线人口统计学和临床特征。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡组间临床特征的差异。结果:经PSM治疗后,两组患者基线特征无显著差异,且平衡良好(P < 0.05)。腹腔引流组手术时间(P = 0.010)、术后抗生素使用时间(P = 0.99)均明显延长。结论:我们的研究结果不支持在接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的成人穿孔阑尾炎患者中常规放置腹腔引流管,并与目前的指导趋势一致。然而,前瞻性多中心随机对照试验是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信