Duration of the serological response and effectiveness of the inactivated influenza vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-65 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 20.4 1区 生物学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Joshua Nazareth, Neyme Veli, Daniel Pan, Christopher A Martin, Aisha Kekere-Ekun, Faduma-Idil A Hassan, Pip Divall, Amani Al-Oraibi, Lucy Teece, Iain Stephenson, Martin J Wiselka, Julian W Tang, Laura Nellums, Manish Pareek
{"title":"Duration of the serological response and effectiveness of the inactivated influenza vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-65 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Joshua Nazareth, Neyme Veli, Daniel Pan, Christopher A Martin, Aisha Kekere-Ekun, Faduma-Idil A Hassan, Pip Divall, Amani Al-Oraibi, Lucy Teece, Iain Stephenson, Martin J Wiselka, Julian W Tang, Laura Nellums, Manish Pareek","doi":"10.1016/j.lanmic.2025.101136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The protection provided by the inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) in adults can wane during a single influenza season. We aimed to assess temporal changes in haemagglutinin inhibition assay (HAI) titres and vaccine effectiveness in healthy adults after IIV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL and screened citations for studies published from database inception to July 6, 2022. We included studies that reported two or more vaccine effectiveness or HAI estimates in healthy adults (aged 18-65 years) after a single standard dose IIV with at least one effect estimate being 2 months after vaccination or longer. Unpublished studies, studies not published in English, cross-sectional studies, case reports, and modelling studies that did not report original data were excluded. We applied random-effects meta-analysis and metaregression to aggregate mean differences in log<sub>2</sub> HAI geometric mean titres (GMT) and odds ratio (OR) for influenza infection over time with inverse-variance weighting. We completed quality assessments using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists, assessed between-study variation using τ<sup>2</sup>, and assessed publication bias using funnel plots. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021233774).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 1387 records identified, we included 35 studies in the systematic review, of which 23 studies reported vaccine-effectiveness estimates, 11 studies reported HAI titres, and one study reported both. HAI titres were significantly higher 5-7 months after IIV than before vaccination (influenza A/H1: log<sub>2</sub> GMT 1·57 [95% CI 1·06-2·09], τ<sup>2</sup>=0·70; influenza A/H3: 1·16 [0·70-1·62], τ<sup>2</sup>=0·46; influenza B: 0·78 [0·08-1·49], τ<sup>2</sup>=0·41). Three studies reported titres 11-13 months after vaccination with no significant difference compared with pre-vaccination titres for influenza A/H1, A/H3, and B. For influenza A/H1, the odds of influenza infection favoured vaccination more than 5 months after IIV (aOR 0·66 [95% CI 0·51-0·87], τ<sup>2</sup>=not calculable), whereas vaccination made no significant difference on influenza A/H3 or influenza B infection more than 5 months after vaccination (influenza A/H3: 0·96 [0·78-1·18], τ<sup>2</sup>=not calculable; influenza B: 0·75 [0·49-1·16], τ<sup>2</sup>=0·10). An assessment of publication bias was restricted due to the small number of studies included in each analysis; when there were sufficient studies, no publication bias was observed through visual inspection of the funnel plots.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>IIV-induced HAI titres in healthy adults aged 18-65 years persisted 5-7 months after vaccination, but might not be significantly sustained at 11-13 months. For influenza A/H3 and influenza B, there was a significant decline in vaccine effectiveness beyond 5 months after vaccination. Evaluating the temporal changes in vaccine effectiveness remains challenging due to methodological biases; a greater understanding is needed to optimise vaccine design and timing to maximise effectiveness throughout the influenza season.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":46633,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Microbe","volume":" ","pages":"101136"},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Microbe","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanmic.2025.101136","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The protection provided by the inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) in adults can wane during a single influenza season. We aimed to assess temporal changes in haemagglutinin inhibition assay (HAI) titres and vaccine effectiveness in healthy adults after IIV.

Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL and screened citations for studies published from database inception to July 6, 2022. We included studies that reported two or more vaccine effectiveness or HAI estimates in healthy adults (aged 18-65 years) after a single standard dose IIV with at least one effect estimate being 2 months after vaccination or longer. Unpublished studies, studies not published in English, cross-sectional studies, case reports, and modelling studies that did not report original data were excluded. We applied random-effects meta-analysis and metaregression to aggregate mean differences in log2 HAI geometric mean titres (GMT) and odds ratio (OR) for influenza infection over time with inverse-variance weighting. We completed quality assessments using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists, assessed between-study variation using τ2, and assessed publication bias using funnel plots. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021233774).

Findings: Of 1387 records identified, we included 35 studies in the systematic review, of which 23 studies reported vaccine-effectiveness estimates, 11 studies reported HAI titres, and one study reported both. HAI titres were significantly higher 5-7 months after IIV than before vaccination (influenza A/H1: log2 GMT 1·57 [95% CI 1·06-2·09], τ2=0·70; influenza A/H3: 1·16 [0·70-1·62], τ2=0·46; influenza B: 0·78 [0·08-1·49], τ2=0·41). Three studies reported titres 11-13 months after vaccination with no significant difference compared with pre-vaccination titres for influenza A/H1, A/H3, and B. For influenza A/H1, the odds of influenza infection favoured vaccination more than 5 months after IIV (aOR 0·66 [95% CI 0·51-0·87], τ2=not calculable), whereas vaccination made no significant difference on influenza A/H3 or influenza B infection more than 5 months after vaccination (influenza A/H3: 0·96 [0·78-1·18], τ2=not calculable; influenza B: 0·75 [0·49-1·16], τ2=0·10). An assessment of publication bias was restricted due to the small number of studies included in each analysis; when there were sufficient studies, no publication bias was observed through visual inspection of the funnel plots.

Interpretation: IIV-induced HAI titres in healthy adults aged 18-65 years persisted 5-7 months after vaccination, but might not be significantly sustained at 11-13 months. For influenza A/H3 and influenza B, there was a significant decline in vaccine effectiveness beyond 5 months after vaccination. Evaluating the temporal changes in vaccine effectiveness remains challenging due to methodological biases; a greater understanding is needed to optimise vaccine design and timing to maximise effectiveness throughout the influenza season.

Funding: None.

18-65岁健康成人灭活流感疫苗的血清学反应持续时间和有效性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:成人灭活流感疫苗(IIV)提供的保护在单一流感季节可能减弱。我们的目的是评估IIV后健康成人血凝素抑制试验(HAI)滴度和疫苗有效性的时间变化。方法:在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane CENTRAL,并筛选了从数据库建立到2022年7月6日发表的研究的引文。我们纳入了在健康成人(18-65岁)接种单一标准剂量iv疫苗后,报告两次或两次以上疫苗有效性或HAI估计,且至少一次效果估计在接种后2个月或更长时间内的研究。未发表的研究、未以英文发表的研究、横断面研究、病例报告和未报告原始数据的模型研究被排除在外。我们应用随机效应荟萃分析和荟萃回归,以反方差加权方法汇总流感感染的log2 HAI几何平均滴度(GMT)和比值比(OR)随时间的平均差异。我们使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估清单完成质量评估,使用τ2评估研究间差异,并使用漏斗图评估发表偏倚。本研究已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42021233774)。结果:在1387份记录中,我们在系统评价中纳入了35项研究,其中23项研究报告了疫苗有效性估计,11项研究报告了HAI滴度,1项研究报告了两者。疫苗接种后5-7个月的HAI滴度显著高于接种前(甲型流感/H1: log2 GMT: 1.57 [95% CI: 1.06 - 2.09], τ2= 0.70;甲型流感/H3: 1.16 [0.70 - 1.62], τ2= 0.46;乙型流感:0.78 [0.08 - 1.49],τ2= 0.41)。3项研究报告了接种疫苗后11-13个月的流感病毒滴度与接种前的流感病毒滴度相比无显著差异。对于甲型流感病毒,接种疫苗后5个月以上的流感病毒感染几率倾向于接种疫苗(aOR 0.66 [95% CI 0.51 - 0.87], τ2=不可计算),而接种疫苗后5个月以上的流感病毒A/H3或乙型流感病毒感染几率无显著差异(甲型流感病毒:0.96 [0.78 - 1.18],τ2=不可计算);乙型流感:0.75 [0.49 ~ 1.16],τ2= 0.10)。由于每次分析中纳入的研究数量较少,因此对发表偏倚的评估受到限制;当有足够的研究时,通过漏斗图的目视检查未观察到发表偏倚。解释:在18-65岁的健康成年人中,iv诱导的HAI滴度在接种疫苗后持续5-7个月,但在11-13个月时可能不会显著持续。对于甲型/H3流感和乙型流感,疫苗接种后5个月后疫苗有效性显著下降。由于方法学的偏差,评估疫苗有效性的时间变化仍然具有挑战性;需要有更深入的了解,以优化疫苗设计和接种时间,使整个流感季节的效力最大化。资金:没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Microbe
Lancet Microbe Multiple-
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
0.80%
发文量
278
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Microbe is a gold open access journal committed to publishing content relevant to clinical microbiologists worldwide, with a focus on studies that advance clinical understanding, challenge the status quo, and advocate change in health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信