Examining the effects of engagement with an app-based mental health intervention: a secondary analysis of a randomized control trial with treatment non-compliance.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Angel Y Wang, Melissa Vereschagin, Chris G Richardson, Richard J Munthali, Hui Xie, Kristen L Hudec, Tiana Mori, Lonna Munro, Daniel V Vigo
{"title":"Examining the effects of engagement with an app-based mental health intervention: a secondary analysis of a randomized control trial with treatment non-compliance.","authors":"Angel Y Wang, Melissa Vereschagin, Chris G Richardson, Richard J Munthali, Hui Xie, Kristen L Hudec, Tiana Mori, Lonna Munro, Daniel V Vigo","doi":"10.1186/s13033-025-00688-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minder is a mental health and substance use mobile application found to have a small but significant effects in a recent randomized trial. Poor engagement has been identified as a common threat to the effectiveness of digital mental health tools that is not accounted for in intention-to-treat analyses. The objective of this study is to conduct a prespecified secondary analyses to identify factors associated with engagement and examine the impact of engagement on trial outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1489 students were randomized to either the intervention (n = 743) or waitlist control (n = 746). Primary outcomes were changes in anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7)), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)), and alcohol consumption (US Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption Scale (USAUDIT-CS)) at 30-days. Secondary outcomes included frequency of substance use and mental wellbeing (Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWS)). A Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE) analysis was conducted using 3 separate criteria reflecting differing engagement levels: (1) a binary measure: use of any app component, (2) a continuous measure: number of unique days of app use, and (3) an ordinal measure: number of components accessed within the app.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80.4% of participants used at least one app feature. Statistically significant differences were observed in app utilization across gender, ethnicity, having a history of depression or anxiety, higher baseline PHQ-9, higher SWEMWS, and poor/fair overall self-assessed mental and physical health. Any use of Minder was associated with significantly lower scores on the GAD-7 (adjusted group mean difference = - 1.09, 95% CI - 1.60 to - 0.57; P < .01) and PHQ-9 (adjusted group mean difference = - 0.84, 95% CI - 1.41 to - 0.27; P < .01) with increasing number of unique utilization days or components accessed associated with increased reductions. Any use of Minder was associated with significantly higher scores on the SWEMWS (adjusted group mean difference = 0.93, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.39; P < .01) and lower frequency of cannabis use (adjusted group mean difference = - 0.15, 95% CI - 0.23 to - 0.06; P < .01) with increased app utilization associated with larger improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CACE analysis identified significant dose-response relationships indicating that increased use of the Minder app leads to larger effects that can reach levels of clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05606601 (November 3, 2022); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05606601 .</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":"19 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-025-00688-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minder is a mental health and substance use mobile application found to have a small but significant effects in a recent randomized trial. Poor engagement has been identified as a common threat to the effectiveness of digital mental health tools that is not accounted for in intention-to-treat analyses. The objective of this study is to conduct a prespecified secondary analyses to identify factors associated with engagement and examine the impact of engagement on trial outcomes.

Methods: 1489 students were randomized to either the intervention (n = 743) or waitlist control (n = 746). Primary outcomes were changes in anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7)), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)), and alcohol consumption (US Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption Scale (USAUDIT-CS)) at 30-days. Secondary outcomes included frequency of substance use and mental wellbeing (Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWS)). A Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE) analysis was conducted using 3 separate criteria reflecting differing engagement levels: (1) a binary measure: use of any app component, (2) a continuous measure: number of unique days of app use, and (3) an ordinal measure: number of components accessed within the app.

Results: 80.4% of participants used at least one app feature. Statistically significant differences were observed in app utilization across gender, ethnicity, having a history of depression or anxiety, higher baseline PHQ-9, higher SWEMWS, and poor/fair overall self-assessed mental and physical health. Any use of Minder was associated with significantly lower scores on the GAD-7 (adjusted group mean difference = - 1.09, 95% CI - 1.60 to - 0.57; P < .01) and PHQ-9 (adjusted group mean difference = - 0.84, 95% CI - 1.41 to - 0.27; P < .01) with increasing number of unique utilization days or components accessed associated with increased reductions. Any use of Minder was associated with significantly higher scores on the SWEMWS (adjusted group mean difference = 0.93, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.39; P < .01) and lower frequency of cannabis use (adjusted group mean difference = - 0.15, 95% CI - 0.23 to - 0.06; P < .01) with increased app utilization associated with larger improvements.

Conclusions: The CACE analysis identified significant dose-response relationships indicating that increased use of the Minder app leads to larger effects that can reach levels of clinical significance.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05606601 (November 3, 2022); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05606601 .

检查参与基于应用程序的心理健康干预的效果:对治疗不依从性的随机对照试验的二次分析。
背景:Minder是一款心理健康和物质使用移动应用程序,在最近的一项随机试验中发现它具有小而显著的效果。参与性差已被确定为对数字心理健康工具有效性的共同威胁,但在意向治疗分析中没有考虑到这一点。本研究的目的是进行预先指定的二次分析,以确定与敬业度相关的因素,并检查敬业度对试验结果的影响。方法:1489名学生随机分为干预组(n = 743)和候补组(n = 746)。主要结局是焦虑(一般焦虑障碍7 (GAD-7))、抑郁(患者健康问卷9 (PHQ-9))和饮酒(美国酒精使用障碍识别测试-消费量表(USAUDIT-CS))在30天内的变化。次要结局包括药物使用频率和心理健康(Short Warwick-Edinburgh心理健康量表(SWEMWS))。使用反映不同用户粘性水平的3个独立标准进行编译平均因果效应(CACE)分析:(1)二进制测量:使用任何应用组件,(2)连续测量:使用应用的唯一天数,(3)顺序测量:在应用中访问的组件数量。结果:80.4%的参与者使用至少一个应用功能。在不同性别、种族、是否有抑郁或焦虑史、PHQ-9基线较高、SWEMWS较高、总体自我评估心理和身体健康状况较差/一般等因素中,应用程序使用率存在统计学上的显著差异。Minder的任何使用都与GAD-7评分显著降低相关(校正组平均差异= - 1.09,95% CI - 1.60至- 0.57;P)结论:CACE分析确定了显著的剂量-反应关系,表明Minder应用程序的使用增加导致更大的影响,可以达到临床意义水平。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05606601(2022年11月3日);https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05606601。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信