[Tibial transverse transport combined with antibiotic-loaded bone cement for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer].

Q4 Medicine
Wen Chen, Li Tian, Tao Liu, Zhi-Jun He, Yan Li, Jin-Peng Li
{"title":"[Tibial transverse transport combined with antibiotic-loaded bone cement for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer].","authors":"Wen Chen, Li Tian, Tao Liu, Zhi-Jun He, Yan Li, Jin-Peng Li","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare clinical efficacy of tibial transverse transport(TTT) combined with antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ABC) and TTT in treating diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 60 patients with DFU treated from January 2019 to January 2023. They were divided into bone cement group and bone transfer group according to different treatment methods, with 30 patients in each group. There were 20 males and 10 females in bone cement group, aged from 61 to 76 years old with an average of (68.15±4.85) years old;the course of ulcer disease ranged from 7 to 28 months with an average of (15.28±5.52) months;16 patients were grade 3 and 14 patients were grade 4 according to Wagner classification; TTT combined with ABC treatment was performed. There were 22 males and 8 females in bone transfer group, aged from 60 to 75 years old with average of (67.85±4.62) years old;the course of ulcer disease ranged from 6 to 29 months with an average of (14.35±5.21) months;17 patients were grade 3 and 13 patients were grade 4 according to Wagner classification;TTT was performed. The control time of wound infection, duration of antibiotic use, frequency of debridement, weight-bearing time of the affected limb, healing time of ulcer surface and recurrence of infection were compared between two groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and ankle brachial index (ABI) between two groups was compared before operation and 2 and 6 months after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months with average of (17.24±4.42) months. The control time of wound infection, duration of antibiotic use, frequency of debridement, weight-bearing time of the affected limb, and healing time of ulcer surface in bone cement group were (11.02±2.14) days, (12.7±3.5) days, (1.2±0.4) times, (90.02±2.75) days, and (2.32±3.45) months, respectively;while in bone transfer groups were (20.14±3.15) days, (20.4±4.5) days, (2.2±0.8) times, (106.64±8.35) days, and (4.53±3.12) months respectively; bone cement group was superior to bone transfer group, and the differences were statistically significant(<i>P</i><0.05). Comparisons of VAS and ABI before and after treatment between two groups showed preoperative VAS and ABI in bone cement group were (6.71±0.73) points and (0.25±0.04) respectively, and those in bone transfer group were (6.87±0.17) points and (0.27±0.03) respectively. At 2 months after operation, VAS and ABI in bone cement group were (3.71±0.47) points and (0.61±0.03) respectively, and those in bone transfer group were (3.79±0.70) points and (0.59±0.05) respectively;postoperative VAS and ABI at 6 months in bone cement group were (2.26±0.13) points and (0.80±0.05) respectively, and those in bone transfer group were (2.57±0.17) points and (0.79±0.04) respectively;postoperative VAS and ABI between groups were improved at each time points compared with those of before operation (<i>P</i><0.05). In bone cement group, there were 2 patients with ulcer recurrence and 1 patient with gangrene;while in bone transfer group, 5 patients with recurrence of infection, 2 patients with recurrence of ulcer and 1 patient with gangrene;the recurrence rate of infection in bone cement group were lower than that in bone transfer group (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of TTT and ABC in treating DFU has a good therapeutic effect, which could be shorten the infection control time, ulcer healing time and antibiotic use time, effectively relieve pain, reduce the recurrence rate of infection and improve the quality of life of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 9","pages":"878-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare clinical efficacy of tibial transverse transport(TTT) combined with antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ABC) and TTT in treating diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 60 patients with DFU treated from January 2019 to January 2023. They were divided into bone cement group and bone transfer group according to different treatment methods, with 30 patients in each group. There were 20 males and 10 females in bone cement group, aged from 61 to 76 years old with an average of (68.15±4.85) years old;the course of ulcer disease ranged from 7 to 28 months with an average of (15.28±5.52) months;16 patients were grade 3 and 14 patients were grade 4 according to Wagner classification; TTT combined with ABC treatment was performed. There were 22 males and 8 females in bone transfer group, aged from 60 to 75 years old with average of (67.85±4.62) years old;the course of ulcer disease ranged from 6 to 29 months with an average of (14.35±5.21) months;17 patients were grade 3 and 13 patients were grade 4 according to Wagner classification;TTT was performed. The control time of wound infection, duration of antibiotic use, frequency of debridement, weight-bearing time of the affected limb, healing time of ulcer surface and recurrence of infection were compared between two groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and ankle brachial index (ABI) between two groups was compared before operation and 2 and 6 months after operation.

Results: Sixty patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months with average of (17.24±4.42) months. The control time of wound infection, duration of antibiotic use, frequency of debridement, weight-bearing time of the affected limb, and healing time of ulcer surface in bone cement group were (11.02±2.14) days, (12.7±3.5) days, (1.2±0.4) times, (90.02±2.75) days, and (2.32±3.45) months, respectively;while in bone transfer groups were (20.14±3.15) days, (20.4±4.5) days, (2.2±0.8) times, (106.64±8.35) days, and (4.53±3.12) months respectively; bone cement group was superior to bone transfer group, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Comparisons of VAS and ABI before and after treatment between two groups showed preoperative VAS and ABI in bone cement group were (6.71±0.73) points and (0.25±0.04) respectively, and those in bone transfer group were (6.87±0.17) points and (0.27±0.03) respectively. At 2 months after operation, VAS and ABI in bone cement group were (3.71±0.47) points and (0.61±0.03) respectively, and those in bone transfer group were (3.79±0.70) points and (0.59±0.05) respectively;postoperative VAS and ABI at 6 months in bone cement group were (2.26±0.13) points and (0.80±0.05) respectively, and those in bone transfer group were (2.57±0.17) points and (0.79±0.04) respectively;postoperative VAS and ABI between groups were improved at each time points compared with those of before operation (P<0.05). In bone cement group, there were 2 patients with ulcer recurrence and 1 patient with gangrene;while in bone transfer group, 5 patients with recurrence of infection, 2 patients with recurrence of ulcer and 1 patient with gangrene;the recurrence rate of infection in bone cement group were lower than that in bone transfer group (P<0.05).

Conclusion: The combination of TTT and ABC in treating DFU has a good therapeutic effect, which could be shorten the infection control time, ulcer healing time and antibiotic use time, effectively relieve pain, reduce the recurrence rate of infection and improve the quality of life of patients.

【胫骨横向转运联合载抗生素骨水泥治疗糖尿病足溃疡】。
目的:比较胫骨横向输送(TTT)联合载抗生素骨水泥(ABC)和TTT治疗糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)的临床疗效。方法:对2019年1月至2023年1月收治的60例DFU患者进行回顾性分析。根据治疗方法的不同分为骨水泥组和骨转移组,每组30例。骨水泥组男性20例,女性10例,年龄61 ~ 76岁,平均(68.15±4.85)岁;溃疡病程7 ~ 28个月,平均(15.28±5.52)个月;根据Wagner分级,3级16例,4级14例;TTT联合ABC治疗。骨移植组男性22例,女性8例,年龄60 ~ 75岁,平均(67.85±4.62)岁;溃疡病程6 ~ 29个月,平均(14.35±5.21)个月;Wagner分级3级17例,4级13例;进行TTT。比较两组患者创面感染控制时间、抗生素使用时间、清创次数、患肢负重时间、溃疡面愈合时间及感染复发情况。比较两组患者术前及术后2、6个月的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和踝肱指数(ABI)。结果:60例患者随访12 ~ 24个月,平均(17.24±4.42)个月。骨水泥组创面感染控制时间、抗生素使用时间、清创次数、患肢负重时间、溃疡面愈合时间分别为(11.02±2.14)d、(12.7±3.5)d、(1.2±0.4)次、(90.02±2.75)d、(2.32±3.45)个月;骨移植组分别为(20.14±3.15)d、(20.4±4.5)d、(2.2±0.8)次、(106.64±8.35)d、(4.53±3.12)个月;结论:TTT联合ABC治疗DFU具有良好的治疗效果,可缩短感染控制时间、溃疡愈合时间和抗生素使用时间,有效缓解患者疼痛,降低感染复发率,提高患者生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信