Halo, Collar, Anterior or Posterior Fusion? Comparative Outcomes in Typical and Atypical Hangman's Fractures: A Systematic Review of fusion rate and complication profile.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Charbel Elias, Ali Daoud, Zeina Nasser, Rama Daoud, Elias Elias
{"title":"Halo, Collar, Anterior or Posterior Fusion? Comparative Outcomes in Typical and Atypical Hangman's Fractures: A Systematic Review of fusion rate and complication profile.","authors":"Charbel Elias, Ali Daoud, Zeina Nasser, Rama Daoud, Elias Elias","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review OBJECTIVE: Hangman's fracture, a traumatic spondylolisthesis of the C2 vertebra, represents a significant challenge in cervical spine management due to its complex anatomy and biomechanical considerations. Management strategies range from non-surgical immobilization (rigid collar, halo vest) to surgical stabilization (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [ACDF], posterior fusion or combination of both anterior and posterior approaches). This systematic review evaluates fusion rates and complication profiles associated with collar, halo, ACDF, and posterior fusion in typical and atypical Hangman's fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed studies up to June 2025. Eligible studies included patients with typical or atypical Hangman's fractures managed surgically or conservatively. Quality was assessed using NIH and JBI tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two studies (1,101 patients, mean age 41.6 years, range 7-94) were included. Non-surgical treatments (collar, halo) achieved high union rates, though halo required prolonged immobilization and was associated with pin-site infections. ACDF (primarily C2-C3 with plating) and posterior fusion demonstrated comparable fusion success. ACDF was associated with dysphagia, aspiration pneumonia, and hoarseness, while posterior fusion carried higher risks of hardware loosening, screw-related complications, infection, and greater intraoperative blood loss. In atypical fractures (123 patients), all approaches achieved fusion, though recovery duration varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While fusion is achievable with all approaches, failure rates exist particularly in posterior fusion for atypical Hangman's fractures. Complication patterns also vary between anterior and posterior techniques. No single method is universally superior; treatment should be tailored to fracture type, patient factors, and surgeon expertise. Prospective multicenter trials are needed to refine surgical indications and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"124530"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Systematic review OBJECTIVE: Hangman's fracture, a traumatic spondylolisthesis of the C2 vertebra, represents a significant challenge in cervical spine management due to its complex anatomy and biomechanical considerations. Management strategies range from non-surgical immobilization (rigid collar, halo vest) to surgical stabilization (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [ACDF], posterior fusion or combination of both anterior and posterior approaches). This systematic review evaluates fusion rates and complication profiles associated with collar, halo, ACDF, and posterior fusion in typical and atypical Hangman's fractures.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed studies up to June 2025. Eligible studies included patients with typical or atypical Hangman's fractures managed surgically or conservatively. Quality was assessed using NIH and JBI tools.

Results: Fifty-two studies (1,101 patients, mean age 41.6 years, range 7-94) were included. Non-surgical treatments (collar, halo) achieved high union rates, though halo required prolonged immobilization and was associated with pin-site infections. ACDF (primarily C2-C3 with plating) and posterior fusion demonstrated comparable fusion success. ACDF was associated with dysphagia, aspiration pneumonia, and hoarseness, while posterior fusion carried higher risks of hardware loosening, screw-related complications, infection, and greater intraoperative blood loss. In atypical fractures (123 patients), all approaches achieved fusion, though recovery duration varied.

Conclusion: While fusion is achievable with all approaches, failure rates exist particularly in posterior fusion for atypical Hangman's fractures. Complication patterns also vary between anterior and posterior techniques. No single method is universally superior; treatment should be tailored to fracture type, patient factors, and surgeon expertise. Prospective multicenter trials are needed to refine surgical indications and long-term outcomes.

光环融合,颈圈融合,前融合还是后融合?典型和非典型Hangman骨折的比较结果:融合率和并发症的系统回顾。
研究设计:系统评价目的:Hangman骨折是一种C2椎体外伤性椎体滑脱,由于其复杂的解剖结构和生物力学因素,对颈椎管理提出了重大挑战。治疗策略包括从非手术固定(硬领、光环背心)到手术稳定(前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合[ACDF]、后路融合或前后路联合)。本系统综述评估了典型和非典型Hangman骨折的颈圈、晕圈、ACDF和后路融合的融合率和并发症。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、Ovid Medline、Scopus和谷歌Scholar,检索截至2025年6月的同行评议研究。符合条件的研究包括手术或保守治疗的典型或非典型Hangman骨折患者。使用NIH和JBI工具评估质量。结果:纳入52项研究(1101例患者,平均年龄41.6岁,范围7-94)。非手术治疗(颈圈、颈晕)获得了很高的愈合率,尽管颈晕需要长时间的固定并且与针部感染有关。ACDF(主要是C2-C3伴钢板)和后路融合显示出相似的融合成功。ACDF与吞咽困难、吸入性肺炎和声音嘶哑相关,而后路融合有较高的硬件松动、螺钉相关并发症、感染和术中失血的风险。在非典型骨折(123例)中,所有入路均实现融合,但恢复时间不同。结论:所有入路均可实现融合术,但不典型Hangman骨折的后路融合术失败率较高。并发症的类型也因前后技术而异。没有一种方法是普遍优越的;治疗应根据骨折类型、患者因素和外科医生的专业知识进行调整。需要前瞻性多中心试验来完善手术指征和长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信