Halo, Collar, Anterior or Posterior Fusion? Comparative Outcomes in Typical and Atypical Hangman's Fractures: A Systematic Review of fusion rate and complication profile.
Charbel Elias, Ali Daoud, Zeina Nasser, Rama Daoud, Elias Elias
{"title":"Halo, Collar, Anterior or Posterior Fusion? Comparative Outcomes in Typical and Atypical Hangman's Fractures: A Systematic Review of fusion rate and complication profile.","authors":"Charbel Elias, Ali Daoud, Zeina Nasser, Rama Daoud, Elias Elias","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review OBJECTIVE: Hangman's fracture, a traumatic spondylolisthesis of the C2 vertebra, represents a significant challenge in cervical spine management due to its complex anatomy and biomechanical considerations. Management strategies range from non-surgical immobilization (rigid collar, halo vest) to surgical stabilization (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [ACDF], posterior fusion or combination of both anterior and posterior approaches). This systematic review evaluates fusion rates and complication profiles associated with collar, halo, ACDF, and posterior fusion in typical and atypical Hangman's fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed studies up to June 2025. Eligible studies included patients with typical or atypical Hangman's fractures managed surgically or conservatively. Quality was assessed using NIH and JBI tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two studies (1,101 patients, mean age 41.6 years, range 7-94) were included. Non-surgical treatments (collar, halo) achieved high union rates, though halo required prolonged immobilization and was associated with pin-site infections. ACDF (primarily C2-C3 with plating) and posterior fusion demonstrated comparable fusion success. ACDF was associated with dysphagia, aspiration pneumonia, and hoarseness, while posterior fusion carried higher risks of hardware loosening, screw-related complications, infection, and greater intraoperative blood loss. In atypical fractures (123 patients), all approaches achieved fusion, though recovery duration varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While fusion is achievable with all approaches, failure rates exist particularly in posterior fusion for atypical Hangman's fractures. Complication patterns also vary between anterior and posterior techniques. No single method is universally superior; treatment should be tailored to fracture type, patient factors, and surgeon expertise. Prospective multicenter trials are needed to refine surgical indications and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"124530"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Systematic review OBJECTIVE: Hangman's fracture, a traumatic spondylolisthesis of the C2 vertebra, represents a significant challenge in cervical spine management due to its complex anatomy and biomechanical considerations. Management strategies range from non-surgical immobilization (rigid collar, halo vest) to surgical stabilization (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [ACDF], posterior fusion or combination of both anterior and posterior approaches). This systematic review evaluates fusion rates and complication profiles associated with collar, halo, ACDF, and posterior fusion in typical and atypical Hangman's fractures.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed studies up to June 2025. Eligible studies included patients with typical or atypical Hangman's fractures managed surgically or conservatively. Quality was assessed using NIH and JBI tools.
Results: Fifty-two studies (1,101 patients, mean age 41.6 years, range 7-94) were included. Non-surgical treatments (collar, halo) achieved high union rates, though halo required prolonged immobilization and was associated with pin-site infections. ACDF (primarily C2-C3 with plating) and posterior fusion demonstrated comparable fusion success. ACDF was associated with dysphagia, aspiration pneumonia, and hoarseness, while posterior fusion carried higher risks of hardware loosening, screw-related complications, infection, and greater intraoperative blood loss. In atypical fractures (123 patients), all approaches achieved fusion, though recovery duration varied.
Conclusion: While fusion is achievable with all approaches, failure rates exist particularly in posterior fusion for atypical Hangman's fractures. Complication patterns also vary between anterior and posterior techniques. No single method is universally superior; treatment should be tailored to fracture type, patient factors, and surgeon expertise. Prospective multicenter trials are needed to refine surgical indications and long-term outcomes.
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS