Update on sport mental health assessment tool-1 false negative rates from the 2024 Paris Olympic and Paralympic Games.

IF 3.2 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002608
Travis Anderson, Jessica Bartley, Angel Brutus, Karen D Cogan, Ashley N Triplett, Amber Donaldson, Jonathan Finnoff, Eric G Post, William M Adams
{"title":"Update on sport mental health assessment tool-1 false negative rates from the 2024 Paris Olympic and Paralympic Games.","authors":"Travis Anderson, Jessica Bartley, Angel Brutus, Karen D Cogan, Ashley N Triplett, Amber Donaldson, Jonathan Finnoff, Eric G Post, William M Adams","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Sport Mental Health Assessment Tool-1 (SMHAT-1) was developed to screen elite athletes for mental health concerns. Previous work demonstrated high false negative rates (FNRs) for the initial triage step of the tool, but given the novelty of the deployment of the SMHAT-1 during large multisport, multinational competitions, replication of these findings was justified and required. This study, therefore, aimed to recalculate classification performance metrics at the triage step and investigate potential reasons for the high FNRs observed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All athletes (n=847) completed steps 1 and 2, including an additional Posttraumatic Stress Disorder questionnaire, and FNRs were calculated. Exploratory analysis, including an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), was used to investigate the latent constructs being captured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Classification performance metrics indicated FNRs ranging from 0% (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) and PHQ9 Item 9) to 63.16% (Brief Eating Disorder in Athletes Questionnaire (BEDAQ)), consistent with previous findings. The EFA identified nine latent factors in step 2, with each instrument appearing to mostly favour its own independent factor, highlighting a range of distinct latent constructs. An exploratory mixed graphical model revealed some step 2 clusters that were not closely linked with the Athlete Psychological Strain Questionnaire (APSQ) items.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings confirm previous concerns regarding the APSQ's sensitivity and underscore the challenge of using a single triage tool to capture the broad spectrum of mental health issues assessed by the SMHAT-1. Future work should consider a bespoke triage tool to better capture the diverse mental health needs of elite athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"11 4","pages":"e002608"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Sport Mental Health Assessment Tool-1 (SMHAT-1) was developed to screen elite athletes for mental health concerns. Previous work demonstrated high false negative rates (FNRs) for the initial triage step of the tool, but given the novelty of the deployment of the SMHAT-1 during large multisport, multinational competitions, replication of these findings was justified and required. This study, therefore, aimed to recalculate classification performance metrics at the triage step and investigate potential reasons for the high FNRs observed.

Methods: All athletes (n=847) completed steps 1 and 2, including an additional Posttraumatic Stress Disorder questionnaire, and FNRs were calculated. Exploratory analysis, including an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), was used to investigate the latent constructs being captured.

Results: Classification performance metrics indicated FNRs ranging from 0% (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) and PHQ9 Item 9) to 63.16% (Brief Eating Disorder in Athletes Questionnaire (BEDAQ)), consistent with previous findings. The EFA identified nine latent factors in step 2, with each instrument appearing to mostly favour its own independent factor, highlighting a range of distinct latent constructs. An exploratory mixed graphical model revealed some step 2 clusters that were not closely linked with the Athlete Psychological Strain Questionnaire (APSQ) items.

Conclusions: These findings confirm previous concerns regarding the APSQ's sensitivity and underscore the challenge of using a single triage tool to capture the broad spectrum of mental health issues assessed by the SMHAT-1. Future work should consider a bespoke triage tool to better capture the diverse mental health needs of elite athletes.

关于2024年巴黎奥运会和残奥会运动心理健康评估工具-1假阴性率的最新情况。
简介:运动心理健康评估工具-1 (SMHAT-1)是为了筛选优秀运动员的心理健康问题而开发的。先前的研究表明,该工具的初始分类步骤具有很高的假阴性率(FNRs),但考虑到SMHAT-1在大型多运动、多国比赛中部署的新颖性,这些发现是合理的,也是必要的。因此,本研究旨在重新计算分诊步骤的分类性能指标,并调查观察到的高fnr的潜在原因。方法:所有运动员(n=847)完成步骤1和2,包括额外的创伤后应激障碍问卷,并计算fnr。探索性分析,包括探索性因素分析(EFA),用于调查被捕获的潜在构念。结果:分类表现指标显示FNRs从0%(患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ9)和PHQ9项目9)到63.16%(运动员简短饮食失调问卷(BEDAQ)),与先前的研究结果一致。EFA在第2步中确定了9个潜在因素,每个工具似乎都倾向于自己的独立因素,突出了一系列不同的潜在构念。探索性混合图形模型揭示了一些与运动员心理应变问卷(APSQ)项目不密切相关的步骤2聚类。结论:这些发现证实了先前对APSQ敏感性的担忧,并强调了使用单一分类工具来捕捉SMHAT-1评估的广泛心理健康问题的挑战。未来的工作应该考虑定制分类工具,以更好地捕捉精英运动员的不同心理健康需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信