A comparative study on early prediction of venous thromboembolism in patients with traumatic brain injury by machine learning model.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Chuntao Wang, Mengqi Chen, Kan Wang, Ling Pu, Siyuan Qi, Zhaofeng Kang, Wei Wang, Tao Liu, Weiming Xie, Xiangjun Bai, Zhanfei Li, Xijie Dong, Qiqi Wu
{"title":"A comparative study on early prediction of venous thromboembolism in patients with traumatic brain injury by machine learning model.","authors":"Chuntao Wang, Mengqi Chen, Kan Wang, Ling Pu, Siyuan Qi, Zhaofeng Kang, Wei Wang, Tao Liu, Weiming Xie, Xiangjun Bai, Zhanfei Li, Xijie Dong, Qiqi Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12959-025-00772-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the post-injury D-dimer decrease rate for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Additionally, we sought to establish a practical and efficient prediction model using a machine-learning algorithm to facilitate the early identification of high-risk individuals for VTE following TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study encompassed patients over the age of 18 with TBI who were admitted to our trauma center, between May 2018 and December 2021. The participants were allocated into training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts. Within the training cohort, predictive models were developed using the generalized linear model (GLM), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model (LSM), and random forest model (RFM), based on the clinical characteristics of the patients. The predictive accuracy of these models was assessed through the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The stability and clinical practicability of the models were evaluated using a calibration curve and a clinical impact curve. The repeatability and reliability of the models were confirmed through a validation dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,108 patients aged over 18 years with TBI who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. Post-injury D-dimer on the third day (PDD3) and the post-injury D-dimer decreasing rate on the third day (PDDR3) were common predictors across the three models and were closely related to VTE for patients with TBI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the GLM, LSM, and RFM in the training cohort were 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-0.87), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.86), respectively. In the verification cohort, the AUROC values were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.90), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.91), and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.86), respectively. The calibration curves of the three prediction models agree well with the actual observed results. All models showed a high clinical net income in the decision and clinical impact curves.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PDD3 and PDDR3 emerged as effective indices for predicting VTE in patients with TBI. We formulated a practical predictive model based on PDDR3, demonstrating satisfactory performance in forecasting VTE, which will assist clinicians in the early identification and initiation of PTP treatment for TBI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22982,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":"95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-025-00772-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the post-injury D-dimer decrease rate for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Additionally, we sought to establish a practical and efficient prediction model using a machine-learning algorithm to facilitate the early identification of high-risk individuals for VTE following TBI.

Methods: This study encompassed patients over the age of 18 with TBI who were admitted to our trauma center, between May 2018 and December 2021. The participants were allocated into training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts. Within the training cohort, predictive models were developed using the generalized linear model (GLM), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model (LSM), and random forest model (RFM), based on the clinical characteristics of the patients. The predictive accuracy of these models was assessed through the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The stability and clinical practicability of the models were evaluated using a calibration curve and a clinical impact curve. The repeatability and reliability of the models were confirmed through a validation dataset.

Results: A total of 1,108 patients aged over 18 years with TBI who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. Post-injury D-dimer on the third day (PDD3) and the post-injury D-dimer decreasing rate on the third day (PDDR3) were common predictors across the three models and were closely related to VTE for patients with TBI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the GLM, LSM, and RFM in the training cohort were 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-0.87), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.86), respectively. In the verification cohort, the AUROC values were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.90), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.91), and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.86), respectively. The calibration curves of the three prediction models agree well with the actual observed results. All models showed a high clinical net income in the decision and clinical impact curves.

Conclusion: PDD3 and PDDR3 emerged as effective indices for predicting VTE in patients with TBI. We formulated a practical predictive model based on PDDR3, demonstrating satisfactory performance in forecasting VTE, which will assist clinicians in the early identification and initiation of PTP treatment for TBI patients.

机器学习模型对外伤性脑损伤患者静脉血栓栓塞早期预测的比较研究。
目的:探讨损伤后d -二聚体降低率对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的预测价值。此外,我们试图利用机器学习算法建立一个实用有效的预测模型,以促进TBI后VTE高危人群的早期识别。方法:本研究纳入了2018年5月至2021年12月期间入住创伤中心的18岁以上TBI患者。参与者被分为培训组(70%)和验证组(30%)。在训练队列中,根据患者的临床特征,使用广义线性模型(GLM)、最小绝对收缩和选择算子模型(LSM)和随机森林模型(RFM)建立预测模型。通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)来评估这些模型的预测准确性。采用校准曲线和临床影响曲线评价模型的稳定性和临床实用性。通过验证数据集验证了模型的可重复性和可靠性。结果:本研究共纳入1108例符合纳入标准的18岁以上TBI患者。损伤后第3天d -二聚体(PDD3)和损伤后第3天d -二聚体下降率(PDDR3)是三种模型的共同预测因子,与TBI患者VTE密切相关。训练队列中GLM、LSM和RFM的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)分别为0.84(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.80-0.87)、0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88)和0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.86)。在验证队列中,AUROC值分别为0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.90)、0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.91)和0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.86)。三种预测模型的校正曲线与实际观测结果吻合较好。所有模型在决策曲线和临床影响曲线上均显示出较高的临床净收入。结论:PDD3和PDDR3是预测TBI患者VTE的有效指标。我们建立了一个实用的基于PDDR3的预测模型,在预测VTE方面表现出满意的效果,这将有助于临床医生早期识别和启动TBI患者的PTP治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thrombosis Journal
Thrombosis Journal Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
69
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Thrombosis Journal is an open-access journal that publishes original articles on aspects of clinical and basic research, new methodology, case reports and reviews in the areas of thrombosis. Topics of particular interest include the diagnosis of arterial and venous thrombosis, new antithrombotic treatments, new developments in the understanding, diagnosis and treatments of atherosclerotic vessel disease, relations between haemostasis and vascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, immunology and obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信