Orthognathic Management of Facial Asymmetry Due to Inactive Idiopathic Condylar Hyperplasia: Accuracy and Morbidity Reduction Without Condylectomy.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Jean-Thomas Bachelet, Christian Demange
{"title":"Orthognathic Management of Facial Asymmetry Due to Inactive Idiopathic Condylar Hyperplasia: Accuracy and Morbidity Reduction Without Condylectomy.","authors":"Jean-Thomas Bachelet, Christian Demange","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000012039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Idiopathic condylar hyperplasia (ICH) is a challenging cause of progressive facial asymmetry, particularly when condylar growth becomes inactive. While condylectomy is traditionally recommended in active forms, its necessity in inactive cases remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and outcomes of a conservative orthognathic protocol for facial asymmetry secondary to inactive ICH, avoiding condylectomy and using patient-specific digital planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten patients (aged 19-56) with confirmed inactive ICH were retrospectively analyzed. All underwent orthodontic preparation followed by bimaxillary orthognathic surgery guided by 3D virtual planning and patient-specific surgical guides. Postoperative accuracy was assessed by comparing 1-year CT scans to the preoperative plan. Long-term follow-up was conducted over 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean deviations between planned and actual postoperative bone positions were 0.79 mm for the maxilla and 1.33 mm for the mandible. No cases of condylar reactivation or relapse were observed. Orthodontic finishing and physiotherapy were completed in all cases without complications. Surgical time and intraoperative adjustments were minimized, with no significant postoperative morbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports the use of a conservative orthognathic protocol in selected cases of inactive ICH, offering precise, stable, and low-morbidity outcomes without requiring condylectomy. Computer-assisted planning and patient-specific instruments allow for accurate translation of surgical simulations into clinical reality. Further studies with larger samples and multicenter designs are encouraged to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000012039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Idiopathic condylar hyperplasia (ICH) is a challenging cause of progressive facial asymmetry, particularly when condylar growth becomes inactive. While condylectomy is traditionally recommended in active forms, its necessity in inactive cases remains controversial.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and outcomes of a conservative orthognathic protocol for facial asymmetry secondary to inactive ICH, avoiding condylectomy and using patient-specific digital planning.

Methods: Ten patients (aged 19-56) with confirmed inactive ICH were retrospectively analyzed. All underwent orthodontic preparation followed by bimaxillary orthognathic surgery guided by 3D virtual planning and patient-specific surgical guides. Postoperative accuracy was assessed by comparing 1-year CT scans to the preoperative plan. Long-term follow-up was conducted over 5 years.

Results: Mean deviations between planned and actual postoperative bone positions were 0.79 mm for the maxilla and 1.33 mm for the mandible. No cases of condylar reactivation or relapse were observed. Orthodontic finishing and physiotherapy were completed in all cases without complications. Surgical time and intraoperative adjustments were minimized, with no significant postoperative morbidity.

Conclusions: This study supports the use of a conservative orthognathic protocol in selected cases of inactive ICH, offering precise, stable, and low-morbidity outcomes without requiring condylectomy. Computer-assisted planning and patient-specific instruments allow for accurate translation of surgical simulations into clinical reality. Further studies with larger samples and multicenter designs are encouraged to validate these findings.

非活动性特发性髁突增生引起的面部不对称的正颌治疗:不切除髁突的准确性和发病率降低。
背景:特发性髁突增生(ICH)是进行性面部不对称的一个具有挑战性的原因,特别是当髁突生长变得不活跃时。虽然传统上建议在活动形式的髁突切除术,其必要性在非活动的情况下仍然存在争议。目的:本研究旨在评估保守正颌治疗非活动性脑出血继发面部不对称的准确性和结果,避免髁突切除术并使用患者特异性数字计划。方法:回顾性分析10例确诊为非活动性脑出血的患者(年龄19 ~ 56岁)。所有患者都进行了正畸准备,然后在3D虚拟计划和患者特异性手术指南的指导下进行了双颌正颌手术。通过比较1年CT扫描与术前计划来评估术后准确性。长期随访5年以上。结果:上颌和下颌骨的计划骨位与实际骨位的平均偏差分别为0.79 mm和1.33 mm。未观察到髁突再激活或复发病例。所有病例均完成正畸整理和物理治疗,无并发症。手术时间和术中调整最小化,术后无明显并发症。结论:本研究支持在选择的非活动性脑出血病例中使用保守的正颌治疗方案,提供精确、稳定和低发病率的结果,而不需要髁突切除术。计算机辅助计划和患者专用仪器允许将手术模拟准确地转化为临床现实。鼓励采用更大样本和多中心设计的进一步研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信