Efferent Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis for Pelvic and Lower Extremity Lymphedema after Gynecologic Cancer Treatment: Indication and Timing Criteria Based on Nodal Function.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-09 DOI:10.1055/a-2717-4946
Yukio Seki, Hitoshi Nemoto, Teruhito Okino, Rintarou Asai, Mayo Tomochika, Akiyoshi Kajikawa
{"title":"Efferent Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis for Pelvic and Lower Extremity Lymphedema after Gynecologic Cancer Treatment: Indication and Timing Criteria Based on Nodal Function.","authors":"Yukio Seki, Hitoshi Nemoto, Teruhito Okino, Rintarou Asai, Mayo Tomochika, Akiyoshi Kajikawa","doi":"10.1055/a-2717-4946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Efferent lymphaticovenular anastomosis (ELVA) uses efferent lymphatic vessels from inguinal lymph nodes, which receive multiple afferent inputs from the lower extremity, to drain substantial lymphatic fluid. However, nodal degeneration during disease progression may impair function and affect ELVA efficacy. This study evaluated ELVA outcomes for lower extremity and pelvic lymphedema based on the presence or absence of nodal degeneration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 30 patients who underwent LVA using the ELVA technique for pelvic and lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) following gynecological cancer treatment. Preoperative ultrasonography was performed to assess the vascularity of the inguinal lymph nodes. Patients with preserved nodal vascularity were classified into the primary ELVA group and underwent ELVA as the initial treatment. Those without detectable vascular flow were initially treated with leg LVA; ELVA was subsequently performed once the vascularity of the inguinal nodes improved. Treatment efficacy was evaluated based on changes in pelvic and leg volume indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on preoperative ultrasonography, seven patients were classified into the primary ELVA group and 23 into the secondary ELVA group. Preoperative ICG lymphography revealed significantly lower severity in the primary group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 31.5 months. Significant volume reductions were observed in leg and pelvic regions, with LEL index reduced from 275.1 ± 33.8 to 247.8 ± 28.2 (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and pelvic lymphedema index from 1,053.2 ± 81.2 to 972.7 ± 76.5 (<i>p</i> < 0.01). No significant differences in volume reduction were found between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ELVA may be effective for both pelvic and LEL, even in advanced cases when performed after nodal function recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":"741-749"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2717-4946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Efferent lymphaticovenular anastomosis (ELVA) uses efferent lymphatic vessels from inguinal lymph nodes, which receive multiple afferent inputs from the lower extremity, to drain substantial lymphatic fluid. However, nodal degeneration during disease progression may impair function and affect ELVA efficacy. This study evaluated ELVA outcomes for lower extremity and pelvic lymphedema based on the presence or absence of nodal degeneration.

Methods: This retrospective study included 30 patients who underwent LVA using the ELVA technique for pelvic and lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) following gynecological cancer treatment. Preoperative ultrasonography was performed to assess the vascularity of the inguinal lymph nodes. Patients with preserved nodal vascularity were classified into the primary ELVA group and underwent ELVA as the initial treatment. Those without detectable vascular flow were initially treated with leg LVA; ELVA was subsequently performed once the vascularity of the inguinal nodes improved. Treatment efficacy was evaluated based on changes in pelvic and leg volume indices.

Results: Based on preoperative ultrasonography, seven patients were classified into the primary ELVA group and 23 into the secondary ELVA group. Preoperative ICG lymphography revealed significantly lower severity in the primary group (p < 0.01). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 31.5 months. Significant volume reductions were observed in leg and pelvic regions, with LEL index reduced from 275.1 ± 33.8 to 247.8 ± 28.2 (p < 0.01), and pelvic lymphedema index from 1,053.2 ± 81.2 to 972.7 ± 76.5 (p < 0.01). No significant differences in volume reduction were found between the two groups.

Conclusion: ELVA may be effective for both pelvic and LEL, even in advanced cases when performed after nodal function recovery.

妇科肿瘤治疗后盆腔及下肢淋巴水肿的传出淋巴-小静脉吻合术:基于淋巴结功能的适应证和时间标准。
背景:传出淋巴-小静脉吻合术(ELVA)使用来自腹股沟淋巴结的传出淋巴管,这些淋巴管接受来自下肢的多次传入输入,以排出大量淋巴液。然而,疾病进展过程中的淋巴结变性可能损害功能并影响ELVA的疗效。本研究基于淋巴结变性的存在与否来评估下肢和盆腔淋巴水肿的ELVA结果。方法:本回顾性研究包括30例妇科癌症治疗后盆腔和下肢淋巴水肿患者,采用ELVA技术进行LVA治疗。术前行超声检查评估腹股沟淋巴结的血管状况。保留淋巴结血管的患者被分为原发性ELVA组,并将ELVA作为初始治疗。未检测到血管流动的患者最初接受腿部LVA治疗;一旦腹股沟淋巴结血管状况改善,随后进行ELVA。根据骨盆和腿部容积指数的变化来评估治疗效果。结果:术前超声检查将7例患者分为原发性ELVA组,23例患者分为继发性ELVA组。术前ICG淋巴造影显示原发性组的严重程度明显降低(p)。结论:ELVA可能对盆腔和下肢淋巴水肿都有效,即使是在淋巴结功能恢复后进行的晚期病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书