Does Academic Quarter or Operative Day of the Week Affect Free Flap Success?

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-09 DOI:10.1055/a-2717-4789
Walter D Sobba, Sophia Jacobi, Janos Barrera, Alexis K Gursky, Hailey P Wyatt, Jamie P Levine, Nikhil A Agrawal, Jacques H Hacquebord
{"title":"Does Academic Quarter or Operative Day of the Week Affect Free Flap Success?","authors":"Walter D Sobba, Sophia Jacobi, Janos Barrera, Alexis K Gursky, Hailey P Wyatt, Jamie P Levine, Nikhil A Agrawal, Jacques H Hacquebord","doi":"10.1055/a-2717-4789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The \"July Effect\" refers to the potential increase in adverse outcomes associated with the annual turnover of medical trainees, although its impact on surgical fields remains uncertain. Additionally, few studies have examined whether the operative day of the week and subsequent flap monitoring during the weekend affect time to reoperation or flap salvage. This study investigated whether academic quarter and operative day influence reoperation rates, flap salvage, or flap failure in microvascular free flap procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted between June 2011 and November 2023. Multivariate analyses adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, flap type, and recipient region. Flaps were categorized by academic quarter and operative day, excluding weekends due to limited sample size. Primary outcomes included reoperation rates for vascular compromise, time to reoperation, and flap salvage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 769 free flaps met inclusion criteria for analysis. No significant differences in reoperation rates for vascular compromise were observed across academic quarters. While procedure duration trended longer in the first three quarters compared with the fourth, these differences were not statistically significant. Additionally, operative day did not impact reoperation rates, flap salvage, or time to reoperation. Flaps were predominantly indicated for head and neck reconstruction (74.4%) and had an overall flap loss rate of 3.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no evidence of a \"July Effect\" in microvascular surgery or that operative day affects free flap outcomes. Institutional factors, such as structured flap monitoring, attending oversight, and advanced practice provider support, likely mitigate risks associated with trainee turnover and shift-based staffing fluctuations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":"681-689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2717-4789","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The "July Effect" refers to the potential increase in adverse outcomes associated with the annual turnover of medical trainees, although its impact on surgical fields remains uncertain. Additionally, few studies have examined whether the operative day of the week and subsequent flap monitoring during the weekend affect time to reoperation or flap salvage. This study investigated whether academic quarter and operative day influence reoperation rates, flap salvage, or flap failure in microvascular free flap procedures.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted between June 2011 and November 2023. Multivariate analyses adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, flap type, and recipient region. Flaps were categorized by academic quarter and operative day, excluding weekends due to limited sample size. Primary outcomes included reoperation rates for vascular compromise, time to reoperation, and flap salvage.

Results: A total of 769 free flaps met inclusion criteria for analysis. No significant differences in reoperation rates for vascular compromise were observed across academic quarters. While procedure duration trended longer in the first three quarters compared with the fourth, these differences were not statistically significant. Additionally, operative day did not impact reoperation rates, flap salvage, or time to reoperation. Flaps were predominantly indicated for head and neck reconstruction (74.4%) and had an overall flap loss rate of 3.0%.

Conclusion: We found no evidence of a "July Effect" in microvascular surgery or that operative day affects free flap outcomes. Institutional factors, such as structured flap monitoring, attending oversight, and advanced practice provider support, likely mitigate risks associated with trainee turnover and shift-based staffing fluctuations.

“学期或一周的手术日会影响皮瓣的成功吗?”
背景:“七月效应”是指与医学培训生的年度更替相关的不良后果的潜在增加,尽管其对外科领域的影响仍不确定。此外,很少有研究探讨一周的手术日期和随后的周末皮瓣监测是否影响再手术或皮瓣保留的时间。本研究探讨了手术时间和手术天数对微血管游离皮瓣手术的再手术率、皮瓣保留或皮瓣失败的影响。方法:对2011年6月至2023年11月769例游离皮瓣进行回顾性分析。多变量分析调整了患者人口统计学、合并症、皮瓣类型和受体区域。皮瓣按学期和手术日分类,由于样本量有限,不包括周末。主要结果包括血管损伤的再手术率、再手术时间和皮瓣保留。结果:各院系血管损伤的再手术率无显著差异。虽然前三个季度的手术时间比第四个季度更长,但这些差异在统计学上并不显著。此外,手术天数不影响再手术率、皮瓣保留或再手术时间。皮瓣主要用于头颈部重建(74.4%),总皮瓣损失率为3.0%。结论:我们没有发现微血管手术中“七月效应”的证据,也没有发现手术日期影响游离皮瓣的结果。制度性因素,如结构化的皮瓣监测、出席监督和高级执业提供者支持,可能会减轻与培训生离职和轮班人员波动相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书