Xing Fan, Zhengjiao Tong, Saiping Mao, Fang Yu, Rong Wang
{"title":"GYPC methylation performance in detecting cervical (pre)cancer in high-risk HPV-positive women using liquid-based cervical scrapes.","authors":"Xing Fan, Zhengjiao Tong, Saiping Mao, Fang Yu, Rong Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13027-025-00699-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Methylation of host genes is promising for the triage of women with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infections. This study aimed to validate the potential value of Glycophorin C (GYPC) methylation (GYPC<sup>m</sup>) in the early detection of cervical cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited HR-HPV-positive women at the hospital outpatient clinic between August and December 2023, using cytology triage. The remaining exfoliated cervical cells were subjected to GYPC<sup>m</sup> testing. A total of 549 cases were finally included for analysis: 156 cervicitis, 303 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)1, 49 CIN2, 37 CIN3, and 4 CC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The difference of GYPC<sup>m</sup> ΔCp values between CIN1 and CIN2 was statistically significant in the pathology results of 549 participants (P < 0.001). The optimal threshold value of GYPC<sup>m</sup> for detecting CIN2 + was 6.35. The GYPC<sup>m</sup> adjusted ORs for CIN2 + and CIN3 + were 31.23 (95%CI: 16.53-58.99) and 34.68 (95%CI: 11.90-101.11), respectively. In all individuals, the sensitivity of GYPC<sup>m</sup> for CIN2 + and CIN3 + was consistent with that of cytology (CIN2 + 83.3%; CIN3 + 90.2%), with higher specificity than that of cytology (CIN2 + 85.8 vs. 29.4%; CIN3 + 79.7 vs. 28.7%, all P < 0.001). The sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of HPV16/18 combined GYPC<sup>m</sup> for CIN3 + were not statistically different from those of HPV combined with cytology (sensitivity 95.1 vs. 97.6%, P = 0.317; NPV 99.4 vs. 99.0%, P = 0.613). The net reclassification improvement for HPV16/18 combined GYPC<sup>m</sup> and its combined cytology to classify CIN2 + vs. < CIN2 was 48.8% (95%CI: 39.7-57.9%, P < 0.001), with a relative colposcopy referral rate of 50.1% (95%CI: 45.5-54.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GYPC<sup>m</sup> has a higher CIN2 + OR and higher specificity and positive predictive value than cytology in HR-HPV-positive women and is a potential molecular biomarker for triaging HR-HPV (+) to detect cervical (pre)cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":13568,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Agents and Cancer","volume":"20 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Agents and Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-025-00699-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Methylation of host genes is promising for the triage of women with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infections. This study aimed to validate the potential value of Glycophorin C (GYPC) methylation (GYPCm) in the early detection of cervical cancer.
Methods: We recruited HR-HPV-positive women at the hospital outpatient clinic between August and December 2023, using cytology triage. The remaining exfoliated cervical cells were subjected to GYPCm testing. A total of 549 cases were finally included for analysis: 156 cervicitis, 303 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)1, 49 CIN2, 37 CIN3, and 4 CC.
Results: The difference of GYPCm ΔCp values between CIN1 and CIN2 was statistically significant in the pathology results of 549 participants (P < 0.001). The optimal threshold value of GYPCm for detecting CIN2 + was 6.35. The GYPCm adjusted ORs for CIN2 + and CIN3 + were 31.23 (95%CI: 16.53-58.99) and 34.68 (95%CI: 11.90-101.11), respectively. In all individuals, the sensitivity of GYPCm for CIN2 + and CIN3 + was consistent with that of cytology (CIN2 + 83.3%; CIN3 + 90.2%), with higher specificity than that of cytology (CIN2 + 85.8 vs. 29.4%; CIN3 + 79.7 vs. 28.7%, all P < 0.001). The sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of HPV16/18 combined GYPCm for CIN3 + were not statistically different from those of HPV combined with cytology (sensitivity 95.1 vs. 97.6%, P = 0.317; NPV 99.4 vs. 99.0%, P = 0.613). The net reclassification improvement for HPV16/18 combined GYPCm and its combined cytology to classify CIN2 + vs. < CIN2 was 48.8% (95%CI: 39.7-57.9%, P < 0.001), with a relative colposcopy referral rate of 50.1% (95%CI: 45.5-54.7%).
Conclusion: GYPCm has a higher CIN2 + OR and higher specificity and positive predictive value than cytology in HR-HPV-positive women and is a potential molecular biomarker for triaging HR-HPV (+) to detect cervical (pre)cancer.
期刊介绍:
Infectious Agents and Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of basic, clinical, epidemiological and translational research providing an insight into the association between chronic infections and cancer.
The journal welcomes submissions in the pathogen-related cancer areas and other related topics, in particular:
• HPV and anogenital cancers, as well as head and neck cancers;
• EBV and Burkitt lymphoma;
• HCV/HBV and hepatocellular carcinoma as well as lymphoproliferative diseases;
• HHV8 and Kaposi sarcoma;
• HTLV and leukemia;
• Cancers in Low- and Middle-income countries.
The link between infection and cancer has become well established over the past 50 years, and infection-associated cancer contribute up to 16% of cancers in developed countries and 33% in less developed countries.
Preventive vaccines have been developed for only two cancer-causing viruses, highlighting both the opportunity to prevent infection-associated cancers by vaccination and the gaps that remain before vaccines can be developed for other cancer-causing agents. These gaps are due to incomplete understanding of the basic biology, natural history, epidemiology of many of the pathogens that cause cancer, the mechanisms they exploit to cause cancer, and how to interrupt progression to cancer in human populations. Early diagnosis or identification of lesions at high risk of progression represent the current most critical research area of the field supported by recent advances in genomics and proteomics technologies.