Bridging the gaps between randomized controlled trials and real-world use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists for adult primary immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1667457
Liping Luo, Shanshan Jin, Zhujin Song, Gaowei Chong, Haiying Ding, Su Zeng, Mengfei Dai, Miaolian Wu
{"title":"Bridging the gaps between randomized controlled trials and real-world use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists for adult primary immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Liping Luo, Shanshan Jin, Zhujin Song, Gaowei Chong, Haiying Ding, Su Zeng, Mengfei Dai, Miaolian Wu","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1667457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluate short-term efficacy/safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), leaving long-term outcomes unclear. This study integrates real-world evidence (RWE) with RCT to assess TPO-RA performance across treatment durations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search identified RCTs and real-world studies (RWS) assessing TPO-RAs in adults with primary ITP. Short-term (≤6 months) and long-term (6-12/>12 months) outcomes included platelet response, rescue therapy, bleeding events, and adverse events (AEs). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random/fixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Meta-analysis included 12 RCTs and 32 RWS. Short-term TPO-RA administration yielded 70% platelet response versus placebo (OR = 18.07, 95% CI:12.4-26.16, <i>p</i> < 0.001), escalating to 85% (6-12 months) and 91% (>12 months) in RWS. TPO-RAs reduced bleeding risks (any: OR = 0.43, significant: OR = 0.40, both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Rescue therapy increased from 12% (short-term) to 32% (>12 months). Serious AE (SAE) incidence matched placebo short-term (OR = 0.69, 95% CI:0.47-1.01) but rose from 8% (RCTs) to 27% (RWS > 12 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TPO-RAs sustain durable platelet response but exhibit increase in rescue therapy and SAEs over time. Longitudinal RWS integration into ITP management is critical, necessitating protocolized safety monitoring and personalized regiments to optimize chronic TPO-RA utilization.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier [CRD42025649608].</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1667457"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1667457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluate short-term efficacy/safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), leaving long-term outcomes unclear. This study integrates real-world evidence (RWE) with RCT to assess TPO-RA performance across treatment durations.

Methods: A systematic literature search identified RCTs and real-world studies (RWS) assessing TPO-RAs in adults with primary ITP. Short-term (≤6 months) and long-term (6-12/>12 months) outcomes included platelet response, rescue therapy, bleeding events, and adverse events (AEs). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random/fixed-effects models.

Results: Meta-analysis included 12 RCTs and 32 RWS. Short-term TPO-RA administration yielded 70% platelet response versus placebo (OR = 18.07, 95% CI:12.4-26.16, p < 0.001), escalating to 85% (6-12 months) and 91% (>12 months) in RWS. TPO-RAs reduced bleeding risks (any: OR = 0.43, significant: OR = 0.40, both p < 0.001). Rescue therapy increased from 12% (short-term) to 32% (>12 months). Serious AE (SAE) incidence matched placebo short-term (OR = 0.69, 95% CI:0.47-1.01) but rose from 8% (RCTs) to 27% (RWS > 12 months).

Conclusion: TPO-RAs sustain durable platelet response but exhibit increase in rescue therapy and SAEs over time. Longitudinal RWS integration into ITP management is critical, necessitating protocolized safety monitoring and personalized regiments to optimize chronic TPO-RA utilization.

Systematic review registration: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier [CRD42025649608].

缩小成人原发性免疫性血小板减少症的随机对照试验和实际使用的血小板生成素受体激动剂之间的差距:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:随机对照试验(RCTs)评估了血小板生成素受体激动剂(TPO-RAs)治疗免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的短期疗效/安全性,但长期结果尚不清楚。本研究将真实世界证据(RWE)与随机对照试验(RCT)相结合,评估TPO-RA在整个治疗期间的表现。方法:系统的文献检索确定了评估原发性ITP成人TPO-RAs的随机对照试验和现实世界研究(RWS)。短期(≤6 个月)和长期(6-12/ bbb12 个月)结局包括血小板反应、抢救治疗、出血事件和不良事件(ae)。使用随机/固定效应模型计算95%置信区间(ci)的合并优势比(ORs)。结果:meta分析包括12项rct和32项RWS。在RWS患者中,短期TPO-RA治疗与安慰剂相比,血小板反应达到70% (OR = 18.07,95% CI:12.4-26.16, p 12 个月)。TPO-RAs降低出血风险(任何:OR = 0.43,显著:OR = 0.40,均p 12 个月)。严重AE (SAE)的发生率与安慰剂短期发生率相当(OR = 0.69,95% CI:0.47-1.01),但从8% (rct)上升到27% (RWS > 12 个月)。结论:TPO-RAs维持持久的血小板反应,但随着时间的推移,抢救治疗和SAEs增加。纵向RWS集成到ITP管理中是至关重要的,需要协议化的安全监测和个性化的方案来优化慢性TPO-RA的利用。系统评价注册:http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO,标识符[CRD42025649608]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信