Case Report: rescue thrombolysis after failed primary percutaneous coronary intervention in coronary artery ectasia with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1595445
Jiejun Sun, Muyun Tang, Zhiyu Zhang, Ming Yang, Zhujun Shen, Ran Tian, Zhenyu Liu
{"title":"Case Report: rescue thrombolysis after failed primary percutaneous coronary intervention in coronary artery ectasia with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.","authors":"Jiejun Sun, Muyun Tang, Zhiyu Zhang, Ming Yang, Zhujun Shen, Ran Tian, Zhenyu Liu","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1595445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is a rare disease characterized by pathological ectasia of the coronary artery. In the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the ectatic culprit vessel is less likely to succeed due to significant thrombus burden and tortuous ectatic coronary anatomy. However, there are currently no clinical guidelines for subsequent treatment when primary PCI fails. We present a case of successful revascularization by rescue thrombolysis after failed primary PCI in a CAE patient presenting with STEMI.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 63-year-old male presented with a four-hour history of typical rest angina and electrocardiographic findings of inferior ST-segment elevation was diagnosed with acute inferior STEMI. Emergency coronary angiography revealed a complete mid-segment occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA) and abnormal ectasia of the three main coronary arteries. Multiple attempts to cross the lesion with a guidewire were unsuccessful, leading to the termination of primary PCI. Subsequently, rescue thrombolysis was administered, and repeat angiography confirmed recanalization of the RCA.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This case is the first to highlight the potential benefit of timely rescue thrombolysis in CAE patients with STEMI when primary PCI fails. It provides useful clinical insight into the management of this high-risk subset of STEMI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1595445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1595445","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is a rare disease characterized by pathological ectasia of the coronary artery. In the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the ectatic culprit vessel is less likely to succeed due to significant thrombus burden and tortuous ectatic coronary anatomy. However, there are currently no clinical guidelines for subsequent treatment when primary PCI fails. We present a case of successful revascularization by rescue thrombolysis after failed primary PCI in a CAE patient presenting with STEMI.

Case presentation: A 63-year-old male presented with a four-hour history of typical rest angina and electrocardiographic findings of inferior ST-segment elevation was diagnosed with acute inferior STEMI. Emergency coronary angiography revealed a complete mid-segment occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA) and abnormal ectasia of the three main coronary arteries. Multiple attempts to cross the lesion with a guidewire were unsuccessful, leading to the termination of primary PCI. Subsequently, rescue thrombolysis was administered, and repeat angiography confirmed recanalization of the RCA.

Discussion: This case is the first to highlight the potential benefit of timely rescue thrombolysis in CAE patients with STEMI when primary PCI fails. It provides useful clinical insight into the management of this high-risk subset of STEMI patients.

病例报告:冠状动脉扩张合并st段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗失败后抢救溶栓。
背景:冠状动脉扩张(CAE)是一种以冠状动脉病理性扩张为特征的罕见疾病。在st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的情况下,扩张性罪魁血管的初步经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)不太可能成功,因为血栓负担很大,而且扩张性冠状动脉解剖结构曲折。然而,对于初次PCI失败后的后续治疗,目前尚无临床指南。我们报告了一例在原发性PCI失败后通过抢救溶栓成功重建血管的病例,该病例是一例以STEMI为症状的CAE患者。病例介绍:一名63岁男性,有4小时的典型静息性心绞痛病史,心电图显示下st段抬高,诊断为急性下段STEMI。急诊冠状动脉造影显示右冠状动脉中段完全闭塞,三条主要冠状动脉异常扩张。多次尝试用导丝穿过病变均未成功,导致首次PCI终止。随后给予抢救溶栓,重复血管造影证实RCA再通。讨论:该病例首次强调了当初级PCI失败时,及时抢救溶栓对CAE合并STEMI患者的潜在益处。它为STEMI患者这一高危亚群的管理提供了有用的临床见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信