Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Monochorionic Twins: Updates and New Directions.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kelsey Pape, Asma Khalil, Hiba J Mustafa
{"title":"Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Monochorionic Twins: Updates and New Directions.","authors":"Kelsey Pape, Asma Khalil, Hiba J Mustafa","doi":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in monochorionic twin pregnancies is a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality with unique pathophysiological mechanisms and management challenges. sFGR is defined by significant intertwin discordance in estimated fetal weight and abnormal Doppler findings, employing the Gratacós classification (types I, II, and III) for risk stratification and management. Epidemiological data indicate sFGR affects 10% to 26% of monochorionic twins, with early-onset cases associated with the highest risk of adverse outcomes. Surveillance strategies include frequent ultrasound and Doppler assessment, and management is tailored to sFGR type, gestational age, and fetal condition. Expectant management is favored for type I sFGR, while type II and III may require fetal intervention, including fetoscopic laser photocoagulation or selective reduction, though practice variation remains substantial. Recent meta-analyses highlight the importance of Doppler progression, gestational age at diagnosis, and ductus venosus findings as predictors of fetal demise. Advances in imaging, biomarkers, and intervention techniques are shaping future practice, but randomized trials are needed to clarify optimal strategies. Controversies persist regarding timing of intervention, ethical considerations, and outcome prediction. In conclusion, individualized, multidisciplinary management is essential, and ongoing research should focus on refining diagnostic criteria, improving neurodevelopmental outcomes, and developing evidence-based guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":10415,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in monochorionic twin pregnancies is a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality with unique pathophysiological mechanisms and management challenges. sFGR is defined by significant intertwin discordance in estimated fetal weight and abnormal Doppler findings, employing the Gratacós classification (types I, II, and III) for risk stratification and management. Epidemiological data indicate sFGR affects 10% to 26% of monochorionic twins, with early-onset cases associated with the highest risk of adverse outcomes. Surveillance strategies include frequent ultrasound and Doppler assessment, and management is tailored to sFGR type, gestational age, and fetal condition. Expectant management is favored for type I sFGR, while type II and III may require fetal intervention, including fetoscopic laser photocoagulation or selective reduction, though practice variation remains substantial. Recent meta-analyses highlight the importance of Doppler progression, gestational age at diagnosis, and ductus venosus findings as predictors of fetal demise. Advances in imaging, biomarkers, and intervention techniques are shaping future practice, but randomized trials are needed to clarify optimal strategies. Controversies persist regarding timing of intervention, ethical considerations, and outcome prediction. In conclusion, individualized, multidisciplinary management is essential, and ongoing research should focus on refining diagnostic criteria, improving neurodevelopmental outcomes, and developing evidence-based guidelines.

单绒毛膜双胞胎选择性胎儿生长限制:最新进展和新方向。
单绒毛膜双胎妊娠的选择性胎儿生长限制(sFGR)是围产期发病率和死亡率的主要因素,具有独特的病理生理机制和管理挑战。sFGR的定义是双胞胎间胎儿体重的显著不一致和异常多普勒结果,采用Gratacós分类(I、II和III型)进行风险分层和管理。流行病学数据表明,sFGR影响10%至26%的单绒毛膜双胞胎,早发病例与不良后果的风险最高相关。监测策略包括频繁的超声和多普勒评估,并根据sFGR类型、胎龄和胎儿状况进行管理。I型sFGR倾向于准治疗,而II型和III型可能需要胎儿干预,包括胎儿镜激光光凝或选择性复位,尽管实践差异仍然很大。最近的荟萃分析强调了多普勒进展、诊断时胎龄和静脉导管检查结果作为胎儿死亡预测因子的重要性。成像、生物标志物和干预技术的进步正在塑造未来的实践,但需要随机试验来阐明最佳策略。关于干预时机、伦理考虑和结果预测的争议持续存在。总之,个性化的、多学科的管理是必要的,正在进行的研究应该集中在完善诊断标准、改善神经发育结果和制定循证指南上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Each issue of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology is a complete symposium on one or two timely topics of interest in obstetrics and gynecology. For each quarterly issue, two prominent guest editors solicit contributions on key clinical topics of interest to practicing physicians. Procedures, current clinical problems, medical and surgical treatments, and effective diagnostic aids are all carefully reviewed in original articles. The result is an instructive resource that dispenses trustworthy clinical guidance that enhances your understanding of key areas of your practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信