Impact of ground motion record selection on higher-mode responses in RC wall buildings: comparing uniform hazard and conditional spectra approaches

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Jose Poveda, Gerard J. O’Reilly
{"title":"Impact of ground motion record selection on higher-mode responses in RC wall buildings: comparing uniform hazard and conditional spectra approaches","authors":"Jose Poveda,&nbsp;Gerard J. O’Reilly","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02259-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reinforced concrete (RC) wall buildings are multi-storey structures comprising several modes of response that contribute to both the displacement-based and force-based demands acting on them during seismic shaking. This research investigates how code-specified methods for selecting ground motion records affect this response, with particular attention to higher-mode contributions. The study contrasts two target spectra: the uniform hazard spectrum (UHS) and the conditional spectrum (CS), both now permitted in the upcoming Eurocode 8 revision. It examines the influence of their choice for several shear wall buildings designed using Eurocode 8 (EC8). By assessing record selection strategies, including UHS alone and different CS with conditional periods beyond the primary mode, T<sub>1</sub>, impacts on engineering demand parameters (EDPs) such as peak-storey drift, wall shear demand, and overturning moment are quantified. The findings indicate that the UHS approach generally leads a more conservative higher structural demand estimate across all EDPs, which is not always very cost-effective. Not surprisingly, using the more advanced CS approach tends to yield much lower demands, but is found to be heavily dependent on the conditioning criteria used. While drift demands can be well-represented when conditioning to the first mode period, <i>CS</i>(<i>Sa</i>(<i>T</i><sub><i>1</i></sub>)), EDPs such as shear forces and bending moments can be severely underestimated. More critically, when other conditional selection strategies are used (e.g., <i>CS</i>(<i>Sa</i>(<i>T</i><sub><i>2</i></sub>)), <i>CS</i>(<i>Sa</i>(<i>T</i><sub><i>3</i></sub>)), etc.), these EDPs increase notably, which could lead to uncon servative designs. This study emphasises the importance of understanding the trade-offs between the presumed increase in accuracy when using the CS versus the UHS for RC wall buildings. It is also an important clarification for the next generation of Eurocode 8 that engineers must be aware of.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 13","pages":"5379 - 5398"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02259-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reinforced concrete (RC) wall buildings are multi-storey structures comprising several modes of response that contribute to both the displacement-based and force-based demands acting on them during seismic shaking. This research investigates how code-specified methods for selecting ground motion records affect this response, with particular attention to higher-mode contributions. The study contrasts two target spectra: the uniform hazard spectrum (UHS) and the conditional spectrum (CS), both now permitted in the upcoming Eurocode 8 revision. It examines the influence of their choice for several shear wall buildings designed using Eurocode 8 (EC8). By assessing record selection strategies, including UHS alone and different CS with conditional periods beyond the primary mode, T1, impacts on engineering demand parameters (EDPs) such as peak-storey drift, wall shear demand, and overturning moment are quantified. The findings indicate that the UHS approach generally leads a more conservative higher structural demand estimate across all EDPs, which is not always very cost-effective. Not surprisingly, using the more advanced CS approach tends to yield much lower demands, but is found to be heavily dependent on the conditioning criteria used. While drift demands can be well-represented when conditioning to the first mode period, CS(Sa(T1)), EDPs such as shear forces and bending moments can be severely underestimated. More critically, when other conditional selection strategies are used (e.g., CS(Sa(T2)), CS(Sa(T3)), etc.), these EDPs increase notably, which could lead to uncon servative designs. This study emphasises the importance of understanding the trade-offs between the presumed increase in accuracy when using the CS versus the UHS for RC wall buildings. It is also an important clarification for the next generation of Eurocode 8 that engineers must be aware of.

Abstract Image

地震动记录选择对RC墙建筑高模态响应的影响:比较均匀危险和条件谱方法
钢筋混凝土(RC)墙体建筑是多层结构,包括几种响应模式,这些响应模式有助于在地震震动中作用于它们的基于位移和基于力的需求。本研究探讨了选择地面运动记录的代码指定方法如何影响这种响应,特别注意高模式的贡献。该研究对比了两种目标光谱:均匀危害光谱(UHS)和条件光谱(CS),这两种光谱在即将到来的欧洲法规8修订版中都是允许的。它检查了他们的选择对几个使用欧洲规范8 (EC8)设计的剪力墙建筑的影响。通过评估记录选择策略,包括单独的UHS和条件周期超过主要模式T1的不同CS,量化了对工程需求参数(EDPs)的影响,如峰值层漂移、墙体剪切需求和倾覆力矩。研究结果表明,UHS方法通常对所有edp进行更保守的更高结构需求估计,这并不总是非常具有成本效益。毫不奇怪,使用更先进的CS方法往往会产生更低的需求,但发现它严重依赖于所使用的条件标准。当调整到第一模态周期时,漂移需求可以很好地表示,CS(Sa(T1)), edp(剪切力和弯矩)可能被严重低估。更重要的是,当使用其他条件选择策略(例如,CS(Sa(T2))、CS(Sa(T3))等)时,这些EDPs显著增加,这可能导致非保守性设计。本研究强调了理解在RC墙建筑中使用CS和UHS时假定的精度提高之间权衡的重要性。这也是工程师必须了解的下一代欧洲规范8的重要澄清。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信