Vertical elastic response spectra for low and high seismicity regions

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Nasser Laouami
{"title":"Vertical elastic response spectra for low and high seismicity regions","authors":"Nasser Laouami","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02241-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper is focused on the definition of the vertical elastic response spectra. This study follows the recent development of the horizontal response spectrum in the framework of the revision of the Algerian seismic code RPA99 (Laouami and Slimani 2025). The same ground motion database is used, which comprises 773 3-component records, from magnitude ranging from 3.0 to 7.4, and hypocentral distances less than 200 Km. A statistical method is used to estimate constant spectral acceleration branch limits, attenuation indexes, and the ratio of the vertical to horizontal response spectra, at two seismicity levels: weak to moderate seismicity (wms) and moderate to high seismicity (mhs). The results of the analysis showed significant differences between the control periods of the elastic response spectra as a function of both the site class and the magnitude. The results reveal that the control period T<sub>Cv</sub> increases as the site moves from rock to soft classes and from low to high earthquake magnitude, whereas the attenuation index decreases with increasing earthquake magnitude. The findings reveal also that the vertical to horizontal spectral ratio increase with magnitude and can exceed unity at near field for vertical vibration periods in the range 0.05–0.1 s. The recommended values of the ratio of vertical to horizontal design acceleration, <span>\\(\\:{C}_{v/h}\\)</span>, for wms and mhs seismicity levels, are 0.60 and 0.80 respectively. Comparison to the vertical spectra of the ASCE7-16 and the new generation EC8-draft2022 standards, reveals that period Tc of the proposed spectra is in agreement with the ASCE7-16 for the wms seismicity level, and with EC8-draft2022 for the mhs seismicity level. Finally, two spectral shapes are proposed for the two seismicity levels wms and mhs. This solution enables a significant upgrade over the present version of the national seismic design code RPA99, which does not offer elastic response spectra for the vertical component of seismic motion.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 13","pages":"5259 - 5273"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02241-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is focused on the definition of the vertical elastic response spectra. This study follows the recent development of the horizontal response spectrum in the framework of the revision of the Algerian seismic code RPA99 (Laouami and Slimani 2025). The same ground motion database is used, which comprises 773 3-component records, from magnitude ranging from 3.0 to 7.4, and hypocentral distances less than 200 Km. A statistical method is used to estimate constant spectral acceleration branch limits, attenuation indexes, and the ratio of the vertical to horizontal response spectra, at two seismicity levels: weak to moderate seismicity (wms) and moderate to high seismicity (mhs). The results of the analysis showed significant differences between the control periods of the elastic response spectra as a function of both the site class and the magnitude. The results reveal that the control period TCv increases as the site moves from rock to soft classes and from low to high earthquake magnitude, whereas the attenuation index decreases with increasing earthquake magnitude. The findings reveal also that the vertical to horizontal spectral ratio increase with magnitude and can exceed unity at near field for vertical vibration periods in the range 0.05–0.1 s. The recommended values of the ratio of vertical to horizontal design acceleration, \(\:{C}_{v/h}\), for wms and mhs seismicity levels, are 0.60 and 0.80 respectively. Comparison to the vertical spectra of the ASCE7-16 and the new generation EC8-draft2022 standards, reveals that period Tc of the proposed spectra is in agreement with the ASCE7-16 for the wms seismicity level, and with EC8-draft2022 for the mhs seismicity level. Finally, two spectral shapes are proposed for the two seismicity levels wms and mhs. This solution enables a significant upgrade over the present version of the national seismic design code RPA99, which does not offer elastic response spectra for the vertical component of seismic motion.

Abstract Image

低地震活动区和高地震活动区的垂直弹性响应谱
本文重点讨论了竖向弹性响应谱的定义。这项研究遵循了阿尔及利亚地震规范RPA99 (Laouami和Slimani 2025)修订框架下水平反应谱的最新发展。使用了相同的地面运动数据库,其中包括773条3分量记录,震级从3.0到7.4不等,震源距离小于200公里。采用统计方法估计了弱至中地震活动性(wms)和中至高地震活动性(mhs)两个地震活动性级别的恒定谱加速度分支极限、衰减指数和垂向响应谱与水平响应谱之比。分析结果表明,弹性响应谱的控制周期随场地类别和震级的变化有显著差异。结果表明:控制期TCv随场地由岩质向软质、由低震级向高震级移动而增大,而衰减指数则随震级的增加而减小;垂直振动周期在0.05 ~ 0.1 s范围内,垂直与水平谱比随震级增大而增大,在近场可超过1。对于wms和mhs地震活动级别,垂直与水平设计加速度之比\(\:{C}_{v/h}\)的推荐值分别为0.60和0.80。将ASCE7-16和新一代EC8-draft2022标准的垂直频谱进行比较,发现提出的频谱周期Tc与ASCE7-16的wms地震活动级别一致,与EC8-draft2022的mhs地震活动级别一致。最后,提出了wms和mhs两个地震活动性级别的两种频谱形状。该解决方案使现有版本的国家地震设计规范RPA99得到了重大升级,该规范不提供地震运动垂直分量的弹性响应谱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信