Probabilistic seismic demand models developed with two-criteria ground motion scaling for reliable risk assessment

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Hossein Ahmadie Amiri, Vahid Jahangiri
{"title":"Probabilistic seismic demand models developed with two-criteria ground motion scaling for reliable risk assessment","authors":"Hossein Ahmadie Amiri,&nbsp;Vahid Jahangiri","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02261-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The present study aims to identify the optimal criteria for the Normalization Measure (NM) and Intensity Measure (IM) in the two-criteria scaling process of earthquake Ground Motions (GMs) to reduce uncertainty in the development of Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models (PSDMs) for more reliable seismic risk assessment. For this purpose, five 2-, 4-, 8-, 12-, and 20-story steel buildings with a seismic force-resisting system consisting of perimeter Special Moment-resisting Frames (SMFs) located in Los Angeles, California, are selected as the case study. Four sets of GMs including 160 real GMs with mid to large magnitudes at near to moderate distances are selected from Baker’s GM database. The maximum values of transient and residual inter-story drift ratios and peak floor accelerations are considered as Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs). A total of 85 potential candidates for selecting suitable NM and IM are investigated, categorized into four groups: (I) acceleration-related, (II) velocity-related, (III) displacement-related, and (IV) hybrid criteria. Accordingly, each set of GMs is normalized and scaled with 85 × 85 different combinations for NM and IM. Then, PSDMs for each investigated building are developed using Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) on 2D nonlinear frame models under the scaled GM sets. The developed PSDMs with different NMs are employed for probabilistic seismic risk analysis and the estimation of seismic demand hazard curves. The optimal criteria for developing PSDMs are identified based on efficiency, practicality, proficiency, sufficiency, and reliable seismic risk assessment. The obtained results reveal the high sensitivity of the optimal NM to the building vibration period, the selected set of GMs, and the EDP under study. For instance, while Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) is the optimal NM for estimating the risk of the acceleration response parameter, a unique criterion cannot be proposed for the transient and residual drift response parameters that would perform optimally under most conditions; however, I<sub>Np</sub> is the best NM for most short-period (2-story) SMFs, and Sv<sub>avg</sub> and MVSI are the two superior NMs for most long-period (4- to 20-story) ones. This study provides valuable insights into the impact of the mentioned factors on the selection of the optimal criteria.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 13","pages":"5301 - 5339"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02261-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aims to identify the optimal criteria for the Normalization Measure (NM) and Intensity Measure (IM) in the two-criteria scaling process of earthquake Ground Motions (GMs) to reduce uncertainty in the development of Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models (PSDMs) for more reliable seismic risk assessment. For this purpose, five 2-, 4-, 8-, 12-, and 20-story steel buildings with a seismic force-resisting system consisting of perimeter Special Moment-resisting Frames (SMFs) located in Los Angeles, California, are selected as the case study. Four sets of GMs including 160 real GMs with mid to large magnitudes at near to moderate distances are selected from Baker’s GM database. The maximum values of transient and residual inter-story drift ratios and peak floor accelerations are considered as Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs). A total of 85 potential candidates for selecting suitable NM and IM are investigated, categorized into four groups: (I) acceleration-related, (II) velocity-related, (III) displacement-related, and (IV) hybrid criteria. Accordingly, each set of GMs is normalized and scaled with 85 × 85 different combinations for NM and IM. Then, PSDMs for each investigated building are developed using Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) on 2D nonlinear frame models under the scaled GM sets. The developed PSDMs with different NMs are employed for probabilistic seismic risk analysis and the estimation of seismic demand hazard curves. The optimal criteria for developing PSDMs are identified based on efficiency, practicality, proficiency, sufficiency, and reliable seismic risk assessment. The obtained results reveal the high sensitivity of the optimal NM to the building vibration period, the selected set of GMs, and the EDP under study. For instance, while Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) is the optimal NM for estimating the risk of the acceleration response parameter, a unique criterion cannot be proposed for the transient and residual drift response parameters that would perform optimally under most conditions; however, INp is the best NM for most short-period (2-story) SMFs, and Svavg and MVSI are the two superior NMs for most long-period (4- to 20-story) ones. This study provides valuable insights into the impact of the mentioned factors on the selection of the optimal criteria.

Abstract Image

为进行可靠的风险评估,采用双准则地震动标度建立了概率地震需求模型
本研究旨在确定地震地震动双准则标度过程中归一化测度(NM)和烈度测度(IM)的最佳准则,以减少概率地震需求模型(PSDMs)开发中的不确定性,从而实现更可靠的地震风险评估。为此,选择位于加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的五座2层、4层、8层、12层和20层的钢结构建筑作为案例研究,这些建筑具有由周边特殊抗弯矩框架(smf)组成的抗震系统。从Baker的GM数据库中选择了四组GM,其中包括160个接近中等距离的中大震级的真实GM。瞬态和剩余层间漂移比的最大值以及峰值楼层加速度被认为是工程需求参数(EDPs)。总共有85个潜在的候选对象用于选择合适的NM和IM,分为四组:(I)与加速度相关的,(II)与速度相关的,(III)与位移相关的,和(IV)混合标准。因此,每一组gm被归一化并缩放为NM和IM的85 × 85种不同组合。然后,利用增量动力分析(IDA)对二维非线性框架模型在比例GM集下建立了每个被调查建筑物的psdm。将所开发的不同NMs的PSDMs用于概率地震风险分析和地震需求危险曲线的估计。基于效率、实用性、熟练度、充分性和可靠的地震风险评估,确定了开发psdm的最佳标准。研究结果表明,最优遗传算法对建筑物振动周期、所选遗传算法集和所研究的EDP具有较高的敏感性。例如,虽然峰值地面加速度(PGA)是估计加速度响应参数风险的最佳NM,但无法提出在大多数情况下表现最佳的瞬态和残余漂移响应参数的唯一准则;然而,INp是大多数短周期(2层)smf的最佳NM,而Svavg和MVSI是大多数长周期(4至20层)smf的两个优越NM。本研究为上述因素对最佳标准选择的影响提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信