Seyed Meghdad Ghaseminia, Tatheer Zahra, Hadi Eslamnia, Julian Thamboo, Hossein Derakhshan, David P. Thambiratnam
{"title":"Seismic fragility of non-ductile and limited ductile reinforced concrete shear walls under in-plane loading conditions","authors":"Seyed Meghdad Ghaseminia, Tatheer Zahra, Hadi Eslamnia, Julian Thamboo, Hossein Derakhshan, David P. Thambiratnam","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02256-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Seismic fragility functions for non-ductile and limited ductile RC walls under in-plane loading scenarios are presented in this paper. In the absence of comprehensive experimental studies, a hybrid approach was adopted, in which the experimental data available from the literature and numerical data generated in this study were combined to establish the fragility functions. An experimental database was developed for non-ductile (with single layer of reinforcement) and limited ductile walls (double layer of reinforcement). Gaps in the RC wall datasets were identified in terms of missing aspect, slenderness and compression stress ratios for various concrete strengths, which were then analysed through a numerical approach. A macro element modelling concept of analysing RC wall was developed by incorporating plastic-hinge formation, compression crushing, shear failure, bond slip and bar rupture as they are the common failure characteristics of non-ductile and limited ductile walls. Three sets of damage states were defined according to the failure sequence that corresponded to the in-plane load-displacement responses of the analysed RC walls. The established fragility functions revealed that the non-ductile RC walls are more vulnerable under in-plane loading than the limited ductile RC walls. In general, the probability of exceedance to ultimate damage state was about 57 to 77% higher in the non-ductile walls than limited ductile walls. The fragility functions established through this study can be used for vulnerability and loss assessments of buildings comprised of these RC walling systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 13","pages":"5713 - 5740"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-025-02256-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02256-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Seismic fragility functions for non-ductile and limited ductile RC walls under in-plane loading scenarios are presented in this paper. In the absence of comprehensive experimental studies, a hybrid approach was adopted, in which the experimental data available from the literature and numerical data generated in this study were combined to establish the fragility functions. An experimental database was developed for non-ductile (with single layer of reinforcement) and limited ductile walls (double layer of reinforcement). Gaps in the RC wall datasets were identified in terms of missing aspect, slenderness and compression stress ratios for various concrete strengths, which were then analysed through a numerical approach. A macro element modelling concept of analysing RC wall was developed by incorporating plastic-hinge formation, compression crushing, shear failure, bond slip and bar rupture as they are the common failure characteristics of non-ductile and limited ductile walls. Three sets of damage states were defined according to the failure sequence that corresponded to the in-plane load-displacement responses of the analysed RC walls. The established fragility functions revealed that the non-ductile RC walls are more vulnerable under in-plane loading than the limited ductile RC walls. In general, the probability of exceedance to ultimate damage state was about 57 to 77% higher in the non-ductile walls than limited ductile walls. The fragility functions established through this study can be used for vulnerability and loss assessments of buildings comprised of these RC walling systems.
期刊介绍:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings.
Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more.
This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.