Seismic fragility of non-ductile and limited ductile reinforced concrete shear walls under in-plane loading conditions

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Seyed Meghdad Ghaseminia, Tatheer Zahra, Hadi Eslamnia, Julian Thamboo, Hossein Derakhshan, David P. Thambiratnam
{"title":"Seismic fragility of non-ductile and limited ductile reinforced concrete shear walls under in-plane loading conditions","authors":"Seyed Meghdad Ghaseminia,&nbsp;Tatheer Zahra,&nbsp;Hadi Eslamnia,&nbsp;Julian Thamboo,&nbsp;Hossein Derakhshan,&nbsp;David P. Thambiratnam","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02256-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Seismic fragility functions for non-ductile and limited ductile RC walls under in-plane loading scenarios are presented in this paper. In the absence of comprehensive experimental studies, a hybrid approach was adopted, in which the experimental data available from the literature and numerical data generated in this study were combined to establish the fragility functions. An experimental database was developed for non-ductile (with single layer of reinforcement) and limited ductile walls (double layer of reinforcement). Gaps in the RC wall datasets were identified in terms of missing aspect, slenderness and compression stress ratios for various concrete strengths, which were then analysed through a numerical approach. A macro element modelling concept of analysing RC wall was developed by incorporating plastic-hinge formation, compression crushing, shear failure, bond slip and bar rupture as they are the common failure characteristics of non-ductile and limited ductile walls. Three sets of damage states were defined according to the failure sequence that corresponded to the in-plane load-displacement responses of the analysed RC walls. The established fragility functions revealed that the non-ductile RC walls are more vulnerable under in-plane loading than the limited ductile RC walls. In general, the probability of exceedance to ultimate damage state was about 57 to 77% higher in the non-ductile walls than limited ductile walls. The fragility functions established through this study can be used for vulnerability and loss assessments of buildings comprised of these RC walling systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 13","pages":"5713 - 5740"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-025-02256-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02256-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seismic fragility functions for non-ductile and limited ductile RC walls under in-plane loading scenarios are presented in this paper. In the absence of comprehensive experimental studies, a hybrid approach was adopted, in which the experimental data available from the literature and numerical data generated in this study were combined to establish the fragility functions. An experimental database was developed for non-ductile (with single layer of reinforcement) and limited ductile walls (double layer of reinforcement). Gaps in the RC wall datasets were identified in terms of missing aspect, slenderness and compression stress ratios for various concrete strengths, which were then analysed through a numerical approach. A macro element modelling concept of analysing RC wall was developed by incorporating plastic-hinge formation, compression crushing, shear failure, bond slip and bar rupture as they are the common failure characteristics of non-ductile and limited ductile walls. Three sets of damage states were defined according to the failure sequence that corresponded to the in-plane load-displacement responses of the analysed RC walls. The established fragility functions revealed that the non-ductile RC walls are more vulnerable under in-plane loading than the limited ductile RC walls. In general, the probability of exceedance to ultimate damage state was about 57 to 77% higher in the non-ductile walls than limited ductile walls. The fragility functions established through this study can be used for vulnerability and loss assessments of buildings comprised of these RC walling systems.

面内荷载作用下非延性和有限延性钢筋混凝土剪力墙的地震易损性
本文给出了面内荷载作用下无延性和有限延性剪力墙的地震易损性函数。在缺乏全面的实验研究的情况下,采用了混合方法,将文献中的实验数据与本研究生成的数值数据相结合,建立脆弱性函数。建立了非延性墙体(单层配筋)和有限延性墙体(双层配筋)的实验数据库。在RC墙数据集中的缺口被确定为各种混凝土强度的缺失方面,长细比和压缩应力比,然后通过数值方法进行分析。将塑性铰形成、压缩破碎、剪切破坏、粘结滑移和杆断裂等非延性和有限延性墙体的常见破坏特征纳入分析RC墙的宏观单元建模概念。根据剪力墙面内荷载-位移响应的破坏顺序定义了三组损伤状态。建立的脆性函数表明,在面内荷载作用下,非延性RC墙比有限延性RC墙更脆弱。一般情况下,非延性墙体超过极限损伤状态的概率比有限延性墙体高57 ~ 77%。通过本研究建立的易损性函数可用于由这些RC墙系统组成的建筑物的易损性和损失评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信