Evaluation of seismic indices for identifying vulnerable reinforced concrete wall buildings in Chile

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
H.A. Gálvez, M.A. Hube, R. Jünemann
{"title":"Evaluation of seismic indices for identifying vulnerable reinforced concrete wall buildings in Chile","authors":"H.A. Gálvez,&nbsp;M.A. Hube,&nbsp;R. Jünemann","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02260-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Past earthquakes have shown that reinforced concrete (RC) wall buildings are vulnerable to seismic damage. Identifying vulnerable buildings before future events enable the implementation of prevention strategies, such as retrofitting vulnerable structures. Assessing the seismic vulnerability of a large building stock is complex, and a rapid and effective evaluation is necessary to identify vulnerable buildings. Different methods have been proposed to evaluate the seismic vulnerability of buildings, ranging from complex analytical methods to simplified empirical methods that rely on the statistical treatment of observed damage after past earthquakes to calculate seismic indices. However, limited studies have been conducted to relate seismic indices to observed damage for Chilean buildings. The main objective of this research is to evaluate seismic indices to assess the seismic vulnerability of RC wall buildings using empirical data from the 2010 Maule earthquake. A database of 158 undamaged buildings and 30 damaged buildings following the 2010 Maule earthquake is considered. For each building, three capacity-based indices, two demand-based indices, and six demand-to-capacity indices are calculated. The demand-based indices are calculated using both the actual seismic demand and the seismic design demand. The ability of each seismic index to identify undamaged and damaged buildings is quantified using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results suggest that capacity-based indices alone are not adequate to identify damaged buildings, while demand-based and demand-to-capacity based indices are more accurate at identifying damaged buildings. Although demand-based indices using seismic design demand are less accurate than those using the actual seismic demand, they remain practical when detailed seismic data is unavailable.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 13","pages":"5837 - 5859"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02260-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Past earthquakes have shown that reinforced concrete (RC) wall buildings are vulnerable to seismic damage. Identifying vulnerable buildings before future events enable the implementation of prevention strategies, such as retrofitting vulnerable structures. Assessing the seismic vulnerability of a large building stock is complex, and a rapid and effective evaluation is necessary to identify vulnerable buildings. Different methods have been proposed to evaluate the seismic vulnerability of buildings, ranging from complex analytical methods to simplified empirical methods that rely on the statistical treatment of observed damage after past earthquakes to calculate seismic indices. However, limited studies have been conducted to relate seismic indices to observed damage for Chilean buildings. The main objective of this research is to evaluate seismic indices to assess the seismic vulnerability of RC wall buildings using empirical data from the 2010 Maule earthquake. A database of 158 undamaged buildings and 30 damaged buildings following the 2010 Maule earthquake is considered. For each building, three capacity-based indices, two demand-based indices, and six demand-to-capacity indices are calculated. The demand-based indices are calculated using both the actual seismic demand and the seismic design demand. The ability of each seismic index to identify undamaged and damaged buildings is quantified using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results suggest that capacity-based indices alone are not adequate to identify damaged buildings, while demand-based and demand-to-capacity based indices are more accurate at identifying damaged buildings. Although demand-based indices using seismic design demand are less accurate than those using the actual seismic demand, they remain practical when detailed seismic data is unavailable.

智利钢筋混凝土墙体易损建筑的地震指标评价
过去的地震表明,钢筋混凝土(RC)墙体建筑很容易受到地震的破坏。在未来事件发生之前识别出脆弱的建筑物,有助于实施预防策略,例如对脆弱的结构进行改造。大型建筑的地震易损性评估是复杂的,需要快速有效的评估来识别易损性建筑。对于建筑物的地震易损性评估,人们提出了不同的方法,从复杂的分析方法到简化的经验方法,即依靠对过去地震后观测到的损伤进行统计处理来计算地震指数。然而,已经进行了有限的研究,将地震指数与智利建筑物的观测损害联系起来。本研究的主要目的是利用2010年Maule地震的经验数据,对钢筋混凝土墙体建筑的地震易损性进行评价。考虑的是2010年Maule地震后158座未受损建筑和30座受损建筑的数据库。对于每栋建筑,计算了3个基于容量的指数、2个基于需求的指数和6个需求-容量指数。以需求为基础的指标是根据实际地震需求和抗震设计需求计算的。利用接收机工作特征(ROC)分析,对各地震指标识别未受损和受损建筑物的能力进行了量化。结果表明,仅以能力为基础的指标不足以识别受损建筑,而以需求为基础和以需求-容量为基础的指标在识别受损建筑方面更为准确。尽管使用地震设计需求的基于需求的指数不如使用实际地震需求的指数准确,但在没有详细地震数据的情况下,它们仍然是实用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信