Rural-urban disparities in cardiovascular and other competing risk of death among cancer patients

IF 13 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Tianwang Guan, Jiaqi He, Liangjia Zeng, Ruoyun Zhou, Kaiyi Chi, Yanhua Yang, Xueqi Xiao, Long Pan, Haowen Liang, Zhijuan Luo, Renyu Li, Jiapeng Wang, Xiaolin Gao, Rundong Tai, Huiwan Chen, Jujian Ye, Yushen Ke, Zhilin Deng, Qingyi Wei, Kang Zhang, Caiwen Ou
{"title":"Rural-urban disparities in cardiovascular and other competing risk of death among cancer patients","authors":"Tianwang Guan, Jiaqi He, Liangjia Zeng, Ruoyun Zhou, Kaiyi Chi, Yanhua Yang, Xueqi Xiao, Long Pan, Haowen Liang, Zhijuan Luo, Renyu Li, Jiapeng Wang, Xiaolin Gao, Rundong Tai, Huiwan Chen, Jujian Ye, Yushen Ke, Zhilin Deng, Qingyi Wei, Kang Zhang, Caiwen Ou","doi":"10.1016/j.jare.2025.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Introduction</h3>Rural-urban disparity of cancer is a major public health problem, with an unclear gap in noncancer death. It is important to evaluate rural–urban disparities in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and other competing death among cancer patients.<h3>Objectives</h3>Observing urban–rural disparities and trends in noncancer deaths in the U.S. cancer population.<h3>Methods</h3>To address rural–urban disparities, we used proportions of deaths, age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR), cumulative mortality rates, subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR), standardized mortality ratios (SMRs), absolute excess risks (AERs) and mediation analysis.<h3>Results</h3>Between 1990 and 2017, there were 2,022,482 patients of 24 cancer sites, with a median follow-up of 11·8 years. Rural proportions of noncancer and CVD deaths in cancer patients were higher than urban ones. Rural AAMR of noncancer and CVD deaths surpassed urban one in cancer patients, who had higher cumulative mortality rates than urban counterparts in noncancer (sHR:1·21, 95 % confidence interval [CI]:1·19-1·22), CVDs (sHR:1·25, 95 % CI: 1·23-1·28), diabetes mellitus (sHR:1·24, 95 % CI:1·15-1·34), Alzheimer’s disease (sHR:1·30, 95 % CI:1·21-1·39), pneumonia and influenza (sHR:1·30, 95 % CI:1·21-1·39) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and allied cond (sHR:1·32, 95 % CI:1·26-1·39). Compared with the general population, both rural (SMR:4·58, AER:218·03) and urban (SMR: 3·74, AER: 166·61) cancer patients had higher risks of noncancer death. Mediation analyses identified median household income and SEER stages as the mediators.<h3>Conclusion</h3>Rural cancer patients had higher risks of noncancer death than urban counterparts, especially CVD-related deaths. Future targeted policy and public health interventions are needed to diminish the rural–urban gap in such death disparities.","PeriodicalId":14952,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Research","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Research","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2025.10.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Rural-urban disparity of cancer is a major public health problem, with an unclear gap in noncancer death. It is important to evaluate rural–urban disparities in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and other competing death among cancer patients.

Objectives

Observing urban–rural disparities and trends in noncancer deaths in the U.S. cancer population.

Methods

To address rural–urban disparities, we used proportions of deaths, age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR), cumulative mortality rates, subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR), standardized mortality ratios (SMRs), absolute excess risks (AERs) and mediation analysis.

Results

Between 1990 and 2017, there were 2,022,482 patients of 24 cancer sites, with a median follow-up of 11·8 years. Rural proportions of noncancer and CVD deaths in cancer patients were higher than urban ones. Rural AAMR of noncancer and CVD deaths surpassed urban one in cancer patients, who had higher cumulative mortality rates than urban counterparts in noncancer (sHR:1·21, 95 % confidence interval [CI]:1·19-1·22), CVDs (sHR:1·25, 95 % CI: 1·23-1·28), diabetes mellitus (sHR:1·24, 95 % CI:1·15-1·34), Alzheimer’s disease (sHR:1·30, 95 % CI:1·21-1·39), pneumonia and influenza (sHR:1·30, 95 % CI:1·21-1·39) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and allied cond (sHR:1·32, 95 % CI:1·26-1·39). Compared with the general population, both rural (SMR:4·58, AER:218·03) and urban (SMR: 3·74, AER: 166·61) cancer patients had higher risks of noncancer death. Mediation analyses identified median household income and SEER stages as the mediators.

Conclusion

Rural cancer patients had higher risks of noncancer death than urban counterparts, especially CVD-related deaths. Future targeted policy and public health interventions are needed to diminish the rural–urban gap in such death disparities.

Abstract Image

城乡之间癌症患者心血管和其他竞争性死亡风险的差异
城乡癌症差异是一个主要的公共卫生问题,非癌症死亡的差距不明确。评估城乡在心血管疾病(cvd)和癌症患者其他竞争性死亡方面的差异非常重要。目的观察美国癌症人群非癌症死亡的城乡差异和趋势。方法采用死亡比例、年龄调整死亡率(AAMR)、累积死亡率、亚分布风险比(sHR)、标准化死亡率(SMRs)、绝对超额风险(AERs)和中介分析来解决城乡差异。结果1990年至2017年,共有24个癌症部位的2,022,482例患者,中位随访时间为11.8年。农村地区癌症患者非癌症和心血管疾病死亡比例高于城市地区。农村非癌症和心血管疾病死亡的AAMR超过城市癌症患者,其累积死亡率高于城市非癌症患者(sHR: 1.21, 95 %置信区间[CI]: 1.19 - 1.22)、心血管疾病(sHR: 1.25, 95 % CI: 1.23 - 1.28)、糖尿病(sHR: 1.24, 95 % CI: 1.15 - 1.34)、阿尔茨海默病(sHR: 1.30, 95 % CI: 1.21 - 1.39)、肺炎和流感(sHR: 1.30, 95 % CI: 1.21 - 1.39)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病及相关疾病(sHR: 1.32, 95 % CI: 1.26 - 1.39)。与普通人群相比,农村(SMR: 4.58, AER:218·03)和城市(SMR: 3.74, AER: 166·61)癌症患者的非癌性死亡风险均较高。中介分析确定家庭收入中位数和SEER阶段为中介。结论农村癌症患者的非癌性死亡风险高于城市癌症患者,尤其是心血管疾病相关死亡风险。未来需要有针对性的政策和公共卫生干预措施,以缩小城乡之间在这种死亡差距方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Research
Journal of Advanced Research Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
280
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Advanced Research (J. Adv. Res.) is an applied/natural sciences, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on interdisciplinary research. The journal aims to contribute to applied research and knowledge worldwide through the publication of original and high-quality research articles in the fields of Medicine, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dentistry, Physical Therapy, Veterinary Medicine, and Basic and Biological Sciences. The following abstracting and indexing services cover the Journal of Advanced Research: PubMed/Medline, Essential Science Indicators, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed Central, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and INSPEC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信