Health risk zoning and governance of cultivated land based on health gain–loss assessment of cultivated land requisition and compensation and ecological vulnerability evaluation

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Duo Chai, Rongzhen Yang, Ying Liang, Xiaoping Zhou
{"title":"Health risk zoning and governance of cultivated land based on health gain–loss assessment of cultivated land requisition and compensation and ecological vulnerability evaluation","authors":"Duo Chai, Rongzhen Yang, Ying Liang, Xiaoping Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Cultivated Land Requisition–Compensation Balance Policy (CLRCBP) is a critical initiative in China's cultivated land protection practices, wherein cultivated land health is a comprehensive indicator to assess the policy's effectiveness. In this study, a cultivated land health evaluation system was developed based on the vitality–organization–resilience framework from the perspective of productivity and sustainability. The health gain–loss (HGL) of cultivated land requisition and compensation in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region from 2000 to 2020 was quantitatively assessed. The ecological vulnerability of the region was assessed using the sensitivity–recovery–pressure model and spatial principal component analysis. Results revealed systematic implementation biases in the land requisition and compensation practices in the PRD region such as <em>more requisition</em>, <em>less compensation</em>; <em>near requisition</em>, <em>distant compensation</em>; <em>prime requisition</em>, <em>inferior compensation</em>; <em>sustainable requisition</em>; and <em>unsustainable compensation</em>. From 2000 to 2020, the average cultivated land health level fluctuated but marginally increased, whereas the health balance between requisitioned and compensated lands transitioned from deterioration to gradual improvement. The spatial heterogeneity in ecological vulnerability increased and 28.80 % of cultivated lands were located in high or relatively high vulnerability zones in 2020, indicating that a portion of cultivated land remained at high health risk. By integrating spatial ecological vulnerability assessments with HGL patterns, cultivated lands were classified into four distinct health risk categories to devise informed targeted management strategies. An adaptive governance framework was proposed for the CLRCBP that aligns with rapid urbanization dynamics and the functional transition requirements of contemporary cultivated land systems.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146774","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Cultivated Land Requisition–Compensation Balance Policy (CLRCBP) is a critical initiative in China's cultivated land protection practices, wherein cultivated land health is a comprehensive indicator to assess the policy's effectiveness. In this study, a cultivated land health evaluation system was developed based on the vitality–organization–resilience framework from the perspective of productivity and sustainability. The health gain–loss (HGL) of cultivated land requisition and compensation in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region from 2000 to 2020 was quantitatively assessed. The ecological vulnerability of the region was assessed using the sensitivity–recovery–pressure model and spatial principal component analysis. Results revealed systematic implementation biases in the land requisition and compensation practices in the PRD region such as more requisition, less compensation; near requisition, distant compensation; prime requisition, inferior compensation; sustainable requisition; and unsustainable compensation. From 2000 to 2020, the average cultivated land health level fluctuated but marginally increased, whereas the health balance between requisitioned and compensated lands transitioned from deterioration to gradual improvement. The spatial heterogeneity in ecological vulnerability increased and 28.80 % of cultivated lands were located in high or relatively high vulnerability zones in 2020, indicating that a portion of cultivated land remained at high health risk. By integrating spatial ecological vulnerability assessments with HGL patterns, cultivated lands were classified into four distinct health risk categories to devise informed targeted management strategies. An adaptive governance framework was proposed for the CLRCBP that aligns with rapid urbanization dynamics and the functional transition requirements of contemporary cultivated land systems.
基于耕地征用补偿健康损益评价和生态脆弱性评价的耕地健康风险区划与治理
耕地征收补偿平衡政策(CLRCBP)是中国耕地保护实践中的一项重要举措,其中耕地健康状况是评估该政策有效性的综合指标。本文从生产力和可持续性的角度出发,构建了基于活力-组织-弹性框架的耕地健康评价体系。对2000 ~ 2020年珠江三角洲地区耕地征用补偿的健康损益进行了定量评价。采用敏感性-恢复-压力模型和空间主成分分析对该区域的生态脆弱性进行了评价。结果表明:珠三角地区土地征收补偿存在“多征少补”的系统性实施偏差;近征用,远补偿;优先征用,次等补偿;可持续的申请书;以及不可持续的薪酬。2000 - 2020年,耕地平均健康水平有波动,但略有上升,被征地与被补地的健康平衡由恶化向逐步改善过渡。2020年中国耕地生态脆弱性空间异质性增强,28.80%的耕地处于高或相对高脆弱性区,部分耕地仍处于高健康风险区。通过将空间生态脆弱性评价与HGL模式相结合,将耕地划分为4个不同的健康风险类别,以制定有针对性的管理策略。为CLRCBP提出了一个适应快速城市化动态和当代耕地系统功能转型要求的适应性治理框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信