{"title":"Air Travel, Statelessness, and the Rights Claims of Ugandan Asians, c.1973","authors":"Ria Kapoor","doi":"10.1093/pastj/gtaf029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the aftermath of Idi Amin’s expulsion of Uganda’s South Asians in 1972, some of those made technically stateless arrived in India unsupported by the United Nations or any national government. Eleven of them attempted to fly on via Sri Lanka, without the required paperwork, to join their families in the United Kingdom. As large colonial empires gave way to postcolonial nation states, and as the international community and the former colonial metropole shed responsibilities towards their former subjects, the various destinations to which such stateless persons were considered for deportation reflect the uneasy status of diasporic communities. Using what official records saw as the ‘problem’ of this international flight, this article explores how the sealed realm of air travel became a locus for the articulation of their rights as these peoples of the postcolonial world used the devices of deportation and ‘shuttlecocking’ against national and international actors to challenge the inequitable application of notionally universal principles to deny material assistance and recognition of their rights as refugees and stateless persons. In this way, individuals and non-state actors were able to use air travel to intervene bodily to influence national and supranational discourses designed to exclude them.","PeriodicalId":47870,"journal":{"name":"Past & Present","volume":"102 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Past & Present","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtaf029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the aftermath of Idi Amin’s expulsion of Uganda’s South Asians in 1972, some of those made technically stateless arrived in India unsupported by the United Nations or any national government. Eleven of them attempted to fly on via Sri Lanka, without the required paperwork, to join their families in the United Kingdom. As large colonial empires gave way to postcolonial nation states, and as the international community and the former colonial metropole shed responsibilities towards their former subjects, the various destinations to which such stateless persons were considered for deportation reflect the uneasy status of diasporic communities. Using what official records saw as the ‘problem’ of this international flight, this article explores how the sealed realm of air travel became a locus for the articulation of their rights as these peoples of the postcolonial world used the devices of deportation and ‘shuttlecocking’ against national and international actors to challenge the inequitable application of notionally universal principles to deny material assistance and recognition of their rights as refugees and stateless persons. In this way, individuals and non-state actors were able to use air travel to intervene bodily to influence national and supranational discourses designed to exclude them.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1952, Past & Present is widely acknowledged to be the liveliest and most stimulating historical journal in the English-speaking world. The journal offers: •A wide variety of scholarly and original articles on historical, social and cultural change in all parts of the world. •Four issues a year, each containing five or six major articles plus occasional debates and review essays. •Challenging work by young historians as well as seminal articles by internationally regarded scholars. •A range of articles that appeal to specialists and non-specialists, and communicate the results of the most recent historical research in a readable and lively form. •A forum for debate, encouraging productive controversy.