Towards valid and reliable measurement of sustainability knowledge

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Talia Stough, Alexander Brewer, Aurélien Decamps, Scott Blair, Wim Lambrechts, Estela Castelli Florino Pilz, Marjolein C.J. Caniëls, Jean-Christophe Carteron
{"title":"Towards valid and reliable measurement of sustainability knowledge","authors":"Talia Stough, Alexander Brewer, Aurélien Decamps, Scott Blair, Wim Lambrechts, Estela Castelli Florino Pilz, Marjolein C.J. Caniëls, Jean-Christophe Carteron","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As sustainability is increasingly integrated into higher education, being able to assess the level of learners’ sustainability-related knowledge is critical to understand where potential gaps are and how curricula can be (re)designed to foster higher levels of attainment. Research on measuring knowledge of sustainability is sparse due to the contested nature of the construct and the lack of valid and reliable measurement tools. In this research, we aim to address these barriers. We consider how different conceptualizations of sustainability could lead to different manifestations of the latent construct and thematic structure of measurement tools. We introduce The Assessment of Sustainability Knowledge (TASK) which employs an “embedded” conceptualization of sustainability to measure the knowledge of the interrelatedness of ecological and social systems (of which economic systems are embedded). Regarding the reliability of sustainability knowledge measurement tools, we posit that the assumption of unidimensionality should be rejected, given the interrelatedness of sustainability as a concept. We describe the use of Multidimensional Item Response Theory employed in TASK and demonstrate the strong psychometric properties such an approach offers. We contribute novel insights regarding sustainability knowledge assessments garnished through developing and piloting TASK to further theoretical and practical discussions of sustainability knowledge assessments.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146762","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As sustainability is increasingly integrated into higher education, being able to assess the level of learners’ sustainability-related knowledge is critical to understand where potential gaps are and how curricula can be (re)designed to foster higher levels of attainment. Research on measuring knowledge of sustainability is sparse due to the contested nature of the construct and the lack of valid and reliable measurement tools. In this research, we aim to address these barriers. We consider how different conceptualizations of sustainability could lead to different manifestations of the latent construct and thematic structure of measurement tools. We introduce The Assessment of Sustainability Knowledge (TASK) which employs an “embedded” conceptualization of sustainability to measure the knowledge of the interrelatedness of ecological and social systems (of which economic systems are embedded). Regarding the reliability of sustainability knowledge measurement tools, we posit that the assumption of unidimensionality should be rejected, given the interrelatedness of sustainability as a concept. We describe the use of Multidimensional Item Response Theory employed in TASK and demonstrate the strong psychometric properties such an approach offers. We contribute novel insights regarding sustainability knowledge assessments garnished through developing and piloting TASK to further theoretical and practical discussions of sustainability knowledge assessments.
对可持续发展知识的有效和可靠的测量
随着可持续性越来越多地融入高等教育,能够评估学习者的可持续性相关知识水平对于了解潜在差距在哪里以及如何(重新)设计课程以促进更高水平的成就至关重要。由于可持续发展概念本身存在争议,且缺乏有效可靠的测量工具,因此对可持续发展的测量知识研究较少。在这项研究中,我们的目标是解决这些障碍。我们考虑了不同的可持续性概念如何导致测量工具的潜在结构和主题结构的不同表现。我们介绍了可持续性知识评估(TASK),它采用可持续性的“嵌入式”概念来衡量生态系统和社会系统(其中嵌入了经济系统)之间相互关系的知识。关于可持续性知识测量工具的可靠性,我们认为,考虑到可持续性作为一个概念的相互关联性,应该拒绝单维性的假设。我们描述了在任务中使用的多维项目反应理论,并展示了这种方法提供的强大的心理测量特性。通过开发和试点TASK,我们对可持续发展知识评估提出了新的见解,以进一步推动可持续发展知识评估的理论和实践讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信