Outcomes of Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation Using Donation After Circulatory Death Donors: A Propensity-Matched Analysis from the UNOS Registry.

Naoki Tadokoro,Sho Takemoto,Mansoo Cho,Taylor Nordan,Michael M Givertz,Tanujit Dey,Mandeep R Mehra,Akinobu Itoh
{"title":"Outcomes of Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation Using Donation After Circulatory Death Donors: A Propensity-Matched Analysis from the UNOS Registry.","authors":"Naoki Tadokoro,Sho Takemoto,Mansoo Cho,Taylor Nordan,Michael M Givertz,Tanujit Dey,Mandeep R Mehra,Akinobu Itoh","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2025.09.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nSimultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (SHKT) has become an effective option for patients with end-stage heart and kidney failure; however, the shortage of donors remains a significant challenge. Since 2019, hearts donated after circulatory death (DCD) have been approved and increasingly used, but their safety in the context of SHKT has not been thoroughly studied.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the UNOS database from January 2019 to December 2024, identifying 1,761 adults who were primary SHKT recipients. To adjust for baseline differences, we performed propensity score matching (2:1 nearest neighbor), resulting in 298 donation after brain death (DBD) and 149 DCD recipients. The endpoints assessed included 2-year overall survival, delayed graft function (DGF), and kidney graft survival.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAfter matching, both heart and kidney out-of-body times remained significantly longer in the DCD group compared to the DBD group (p < 0.001). DGF was more common in the DCD group (36% vs. 26%, p = 0.023). Two-year survival rates were 83.6% in the DCD group and 82.3% in the DBD group (p = 0.88). Robust Cox models showed no association between donor type and two-year mortality (Hazard Ratio: 0.78, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.43-1.44, p = 0.5) or kidney graft failure (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.16-2.26, p = 0.5).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nSHKT using DCD donor organs shows similar two-year survival and graft outcomes compared to those using DBD donors, supporting the safe and effective use of DCD organs to expand the donor pool.","PeriodicalId":22654,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2025.09.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (SHKT) has become an effective option for patients with end-stage heart and kidney failure; however, the shortage of donors remains a significant challenge. Since 2019, hearts donated after circulatory death (DCD) have been approved and increasingly used, but their safety in the context of SHKT has not been thoroughly studied. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the UNOS database from January 2019 to December 2024, identifying 1,761 adults who were primary SHKT recipients. To adjust for baseline differences, we performed propensity score matching (2:1 nearest neighbor), resulting in 298 donation after brain death (DBD) and 149 DCD recipients. The endpoints assessed included 2-year overall survival, delayed graft function (DGF), and kidney graft survival. RESULTS After matching, both heart and kidney out-of-body times remained significantly longer in the DCD group compared to the DBD group (p < 0.001). DGF was more common in the DCD group (36% vs. 26%, p = 0.023). Two-year survival rates were 83.6% in the DCD group and 82.3% in the DBD group (p = 0.88). Robust Cox models showed no association between donor type and two-year mortality (Hazard Ratio: 0.78, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.43-1.44, p = 0.5) or kidney graft failure (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.16-2.26, p = 0.5). CONCLUSION SHKT using DCD donor organs shows similar two-year survival and graft outcomes compared to those using DBD donors, supporting the safe and effective use of DCD organs to expand the donor pool.
循环性死亡供者捐献后同时进行心脏肾移植的结果:来自UNOS登记处的倾向匹配分析
同步心肾移植(SHKT)已成为终末期心脏和肾衰竭患者的有效选择;然而,捐助者短缺仍然是一个重大挑战。自2019年以来,循环死亡(DCD)后捐赠的心脏已被批准并越来越多地使用,但其在SHKT背景下的安全性尚未得到彻底研究。方法:2019年1月至2024年12月,我们使用UNOS数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究,确定了1761名原发性SHKT接受者。为了调整基线差异,我们进行了倾向评分匹配(2:1最近邻),导致298名脑死亡(DBD)后捐赠和149名DCD接受者。评估的终点包括2年总生存期、延迟移植功能(DGF)和肾移植生存期。结果匹配后,DCD组心脏和肾脏离体时间明显长于DBD组(p < 0.001)。DGF在DCD组中更为常见(36% vs. 26%, p = 0.023)。DCD组2年生存率为83.6%,DBD组为82.3% (p = 0.88)。稳健的Cox模型显示供体类型与两年死亡率(风险比:0.78,95%可信区间:0.43-1.44,p = 0.5)或肾移植衰竭(风险比:0.61,95% CI: 0.16-2.26, p = 0.5)之间无关联。结论使用DCD供体器官的shkt与使用DBD供体器官的shkt相比具有相似的2年生存率和移植结果,支持安全有效地使用DCD器官来扩大供体池。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信