Resisting Chauvinist Stereotypes: The Impertinence of Russian Painting at London’s International Exhibition of 1862

IF 0.3 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Arts Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI:10.3390/arts14050118
Rosalind Polly Blakesley
{"title":"Resisting Chauvinist Stereotypes: The Impertinence of Russian Painting at London’s International Exhibition of 1862","authors":"Rosalind Polly Blakesley","doi":"10.3390/arts14050118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Russian empire’s displays of applied and decorative art at the Great Exhibition of 1851 and its immediate successors have long galvanised scholars for their semantic complexity. By contrast, Russia’s first selection of paintings for this fiercely competitive arena, shown at London’s International Exhibition of 1862, failed to ignite the public imagination and has largely evaded the historian’s gaze. While the three-dimensional artworks provided a recurrent source of wonderment for their superlative craftsmanship, stupendous materials, and often hyperbolic proportions, the paintings were apparently flat in every sense of the word: derivative, lacklustre, and incapable of capitalising on the opportunity that international exhibitions offered to present a national school. The dismissive comments they attracted set the tone for many later accounts, embedding the idea that Russian painting prior to the twentieth century was of limited consequence—a perception that would prove convenient to those asserting the originality of the avant-garde. Yet renewed consideration of Russia’s display of paintings in 1862 suggests that their critical reception speaks to concerns that went well beyond the pictures’ supposed obligation to represent a national school. Notably, a small but significant number of history and portrait paintings by academically trained and often well-travelled artists challenged notions of Russians as primitive and parochial. The technically adventurous of these parried the belief that Russian art was insufficiently mature to experiment in painterly effect. Most audacious of all, they broached unspoken national boundaries by daring to suggest that Imperial Russian artists could innovate in areas on which the success of British painting rested. The attitudes towards Russian painting in 1862 thus invite fresh scrutiny, revealing as they do a disruptive arena in which aesthetic rivalries and chauvinist sensibilities came to the fore.","PeriodicalId":30547,"journal":{"name":"Arts","volume":"157 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/arts14050118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Russian empire’s displays of applied and decorative art at the Great Exhibition of 1851 and its immediate successors have long galvanised scholars for their semantic complexity. By contrast, Russia’s first selection of paintings for this fiercely competitive arena, shown at London’s International Exhibition of 1862, failed to ignite the public imagination and has largely evaded the historian’s gaze. While the three-dimensional artworks provided a recurrent source of wonderment for their superlative craftsmanship, stupendous materials, and often hyperbolic proportions, the paintings were apparently flat in every sense of the word: derivative, lacklustre, and incapable of capitalising on the opportunity that international exhibitions offered to present a national school. The dismissive comments they attracted set the tone for many later accounts, embedding the idea that Russian painting prior to the twentieth century was of limited consequence—a perception that would prove convenient to those asserting the originality of the avant-garde. Yet renewed consideration of Russia’s display of paintings in 1862 suggests that their critical reception speaks to concerns that went well beyond the pictures’ supposed obligation to represent a national school. Notably, a small but significant number of history and portrait paintings by academically trained and often well-travelled artists challenged notions of Russians as primitive and parochial. The technically adventurous of these parried the belief that Russian art was insufficiently mature to experiment in painterly effect. Most audacious of all, they broached unspoken national boundaries by daring to suggest that Imperial Russian artists could innovate in areas on which the success of British painting rested. The attitudes towards Russian painting in 1862 thus invite fresh scrutiny, revealing as they do a disruptive arena in which aesthetic rivalries and chauvinist sensibilities came to the fore.
抵制沙文主义的刻板印象:1862年伦敦国际展览会上俄罗斯绘画的无礼
俄罗斯帝国在1851年的大展览(Great Exhibition)及其后续展览中展示的实用和装饰艺术,长期以来一直因其语义复杂性而激励着学者。相比之下,俄罗斯在1862年伦敦国际展览会上为这个竞争激烈的舞台展出的第一批精选画作未能激发公众的想象力,而且在很大程度上躲过了历史学家的目光。虽然三维艺术作品以其精湛的工艺、惊人的材料和经常夸张的比例为人们提供了惊叹的源泉,但这些画显然在任何意义上都是扁平的:衍生品,平淡无奇,无法利用国际展览提供的机会来展示一个国家的学校。他们所吸引的轻蔑的评论为后来的许多描述奠定了基调,嵌入了一种观点,即20世纪之前的俄罗斯绘画影响有限——这种看法对那些主张先锋派独创性的人来说是方便的。然而,对1862年俄罗斯绘画展览的重新思考表明,他们受到的批评表明,人们的担忧远远超出了这些画应该代表一个国家学校的义务。值得注意的是,由受过学术训练、经常游历各地的艺术家创作的为数不多但意义重大的历史和肖像画,挑战了俄罗斯人原始和狭隘的观念。这些艺术在技术上具有冒险精神,使人们相信俄罗斯艺术还不够成熟,无法在绘画效果上进行实验。最大胆的是,他们大胆地提出,俄罗斯帝国的艺术家可以在英国绘画成功的基础上进行创新,从而触及了不言而喻的国界。因此,1862年对俄罗斯绘画的态度引起了新的审视,揭示了一个破坏性的舞台,在这个舞台上,审美竞争和沙文主义的敏感性脱颖而出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arts
Arts HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
40.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信