{"title":"An artificial intelligence assistant to reader response theory: Pioneering novel analysis in the digital age","authors":"Nursaid Nursaid, Bima Mhd Ghaluh, Ella Wulandari","doi":"10.1177/13621688251368636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI) assistant on reader response theory in novel analysis using a mixed-methods approach. It examines how AI-generated real-time feedback, powered by advanced machine learning and natural language processing, enhances interpretive possibilities beyond conventional methods, aligning with reader response theory’s emphasis on reader-text interaction. The AI assistant, designed with Real-Time Theme Identification, Character Relationship Mapping, Symbolism Detection, and Interactive Literary Simulation, supports nuanced interpretations, uncovers underlying patterns, and fosters deeper engagement with literary texts. Participants ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 100), aged 15–18 years, were divided into an experimental group ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 50), which used the AI assistant for novel analysis, and a control group ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 50), which relied on traditional literary analysis methods. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-study assessments of participants’ interpretive skills, measured on a 100-point scale, while qualitative insights were gathered via in-depth interviews and focus groups. The AI’s effectiveness in interpretive skills and comprehension was evaluated by comparing outcomes between groups. The results show that the experimental group markedly outperformed the control group, with a mean increase in interpretation scores from 70.5 (SD = 6.1) to 85.2 (SD = 5.8; <jats:italic>t</jats:italic> (49) = 5.23, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .001), reflecting a 20.8% improvement in identifying textual connections and a 15% increase in offering diverse perspectives. In contrast, the control group’s scores rose modestly from 69.8 (SD = 6.3) to 75.1 (SD = 6.2; <jats:italic>t</jats:italic> (49) = 2.14, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .05), showing only a 7.6% improvement in textual connections and a 5% increase in diverse perspectives. Qualitative findings indicated improved comprehension, critical thinking, motivation, and emotional engagement, with 80% of participants reporting increased analytical confidence due to the AI assistant. These results suggest that AI integration advances reader response theory, improves interpretation, and enhances accessibility for diverse students in digital literary education.","PeriodicalId":47852,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251368636","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI) assistant on reader response theory in novel analysis using a mixed-methods approach. It examines how AI-generated real-time feedback, powered by advanced machine learning and natural language processing, enhances interpretive possibilities beyond conventional methods, aligning with reader response theory’s emphasis on reader-text interaction. The AI assistant, designed with Real-Time Theme Identification, Character Relationship Mapping, Symbolism Detection, and Interactive Literary Simulation, supports nuanced interpretations, uncovers underlying patterns, and fosters deeper engagement with literary texts. Participants ( n = 100), aged 15–18 years, were divided into an experimental group ( n = 50), which used the AI assistant for novel analysis, and a control group ( n = 50), which relied on traditional literary analysis methods. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-study assessments of participants’ interpretive skills, measured on a 100-point scale, while qualitative insights were gathered via in-depth interviews and focus groups. The AI’s effectiveness in interpretive skills and comprehension was evaluated by comparing outcomes between groups. The results show that the experimental group markedly outperformed the control group, with a mean increase in interpretation scores from 70.5 (SD = 6.1) to 85.2 (SD = 5.8; t (49) = 5.23, p < .001), reflecting a 20.8% improvement in identifying textual connections and a 15% increase in offering diverse perspectives. In contrast, the control group’s scores rose modestly from 69.8 (SD = 6.3) to 75.1 (SD = 6.2; t (49) = 2.14, p < .05), showing only a 7.6% improvement in textual connections and a 5% increase in diverse perspectives. Qualitative findings indicated improved comprehension, critical thinking, motivation, and emotional engagement, with 80% of participants reporting increased analytical confidence due to the AI assistant. These results suggest that AI integration advances reader response theory, improves interpretation, and enhances accessibility for diverse students in digital literary education.
期刊介绍:
Language Teaching Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research within the area of second or foreign language teaching. Although articles are written in English, the journal welcomes studies dealing with the teaching of languages other than English as well. The journal is a venue for studies that demonstrate sound research methods and which report findings that have clear pedagogical implications. A wide range of topics in the area of language teaching is covered, including: -Programme -Syllabus -Materials design -Methodology -The teaching of specific skills and language for specific purposes Thorough investigation and research ensures this journal is: -International in focus, publishing work from countries worldwide -Interdisciplinary, encouraging work which seeks to break down barriers that have isolated language teaching professionals from others concerned with pedagogy -Innovative, seeking to stimulate new avenues of enquiry, including ''action'' research