An artificial intelligence assistant to reader response theory: Pioneering novel analysis in the digital age

IF 3.8 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nursaid Nursaid, Bima Mhd Ghaluh, Ella Wulandari
{"title":"An artificial intelligence assistant to reader response theory: Pioneering novel analysis in the digital age","authors":"Nursaid Nursaid, Bima Mhd Ghaluh, Ella Wulandari","doi":"10.1177/13621688251368636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI) assistant on reader response theory in novel analysis using a mixed-methods approach. It examines how AI-generated real-time feedback, powered by advanced machine learning and natural language processing, enhances interpretive possibilities beyond conventional methods, aligning with reader response theory’s emphasis on reader-text interaction. The AI assistant, designed with Real-Time Theme Identification, Character Relationship Mapping, Symbolism Detection, and Interactive Literary Simulation, supports nuanced interpretations, uncovers underlying patterns, and fosters deeper engagement with literary texts. Participants ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 100), aged 15–18 years, were divided into an experimental group ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 50), which used the AI assistant for novel analysis, and a control group ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 50), which relied on traditional literary analysis methods. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-study assessments of participants’ interpretive skills, measured on a 100-point scale, while qualitative insights were gathered via in-depth interviews and focus groups. The AI’s effectiveness in interpretive skills and comprehension was evaluated by comparing outcomes between groups. The results show that the experimental group markedly outperformed the control group, with a mean increase in interpretation scores from 70.5 (SD = 6.1) to 85.2 (SD = 5.8; <jats:italic>t</jats:italic> (49) = 5.23, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .001), reflecting a 20.8% improvement in identifying textual connections and a 15% increase in offering diverse perspectives. In contrast, the control group’s scores rose modestly from 69.8 (SD = 6.3) to 75.1 (SD = 6.2; <jats:italic>t</jats:italic> (49) = 2.14, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .05), showing only a 7.6% improvement in textual connections and a 5% increase in diverse perspectives. Qualitative findings indicated improved comprehension, critical thinking, motivation, and emotional engagement, with 80% of participants reporting increased analytical confidence due to the AI assistant. These results suggest that AI integration advances reader response theory, improves interpretation, and enhances accessibility for diverse students in digital literary education.","PeriodicalId":47852,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251368636","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI) assistant on reader response theory in novel analysis using a mixed-methods approach. It examines how AI-generated real-time feedback, powered by advanced machine learning and natural language processing, enhances interpretive possibilities beyond conventional methods, aligning with reader response theory’s emphasis on reader-text interaction. The AI assistant, designed with Real-Time Theme Identification, Character Relationship Mapping, Symbolism Detection, and Interactive Literary Simulation, supports nuanced interpretations, uncovers underlying patterns, and fosters deeper engagement with literary texts. Participants ( n = 100), aged 15–18 years, were divided into an experimental group ( n = 50), which used the AI assistant for novel analysis, and a control group ( n = 50), which relied on traditional literary analysis methods. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-study assessments of participants’ interpretive skills, measured on a 100-point scale, while qualitative insights were gathered via in-depth interviews and focus groups. The AI’s effectiveness in interpretive skills and comprehension was evaluated by comparing outcomes between groups. The results show that the experimental group markedly outperformed the control group, with a mean increase in interpretation scores from 70.5 (SD = 6.1) to 85.2 (SD = 5.8; t (49) = 5.23, p < .001), reflecting a 20.8% improvement in identifying textual connections and a 15% increase in offering diverse perspectives. In contrast, the control group’s scores rose modestly from 69.8 (SD = 6.3) to 75.1 (SD = 6.2; t (49) = 2.14, p < .05), showing only a 7.6% improvement in textual connections and a 5% increase in diverse perspectives. Qualitative findings indicated improved comprehension, critical thinking, motivation, and emotional engagement, with 80% of participants reporting increased analytical confidence due to the AI assistant. These results suggest that AI integration advances reader response theory, improves interpretation, and enhances accessibility for diverse students in digital literary education.
读者反应理论的人工智能助手:数字时代的先锋小说分析
本研究采用混合方法探讨了人工智能(AI)助手对小说分析中读者反应理论的影响。它研究了人工智能生成的实时反馈,由先进的机器学习和自然语言处理提供支持,如何增强传统方法之外的解释可能性,与读者反应理论对读者-文本交互的强调保持一致。这款人工智能助手具有实时主题识别、角色关系映射、符号检测和交互式文学模拟功能,支持细致入微的解读,揭示潜在的模式,并促进与文学文本的更深入接触。参与者(n = 100),年龄在15-18岁之间,分为实验组(n = 50)和对照组(n = 50),实验组使用人工智能助手进行小说分析,对照组使用传统的文学分析方法。定量数据是通过研究前和研究后对参与者解释技能的评估收集的,以100分制衡量,而定性见解是通过深入访谈和焦点小组收集的。通过比较各组之间的结果来评估人工智能在解释技能和理解方面的有效性。结果表明,实验组的表现明显优于对照组,口译分数平均从70.5 (SD = 6.1)提高到85.2 (SD = 5.8; t (49) = 5.23, p < .001),反映了识别文本连接方面提高了20.8%,提供多样化视角方面提高了15%。相比之下,对照组的得分从69.8 (SD = 6.3)小幅上升到75.1 (SD = 6.2; t (49) = 2.14, p < 0.05),显示文本连接仅提高了7.6%,多样化视角仅提高了5%。定性研究结果表明,人工智能助手提高了理解能力、批判性思维、动机和情感投入,80%的参与者报告说,人工智能助手提高了他们的分析信心。这些结果表明,人工智能集成推进了读者反应理论,改善了解释,并增强了数字文学教育中不同学生的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: Language Teaching Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research within the area of second or foreign language teaching. Although articles are written in English, the journal welcomes studies dealing with the teaching of languages other than English as well. The journal is a venue for studies that demonstrate sound research methods and which report findings that have clear pedagogical implications. A wide range of topics in the area of language teaching is covered, including: -Programme -Syllabus -Materials design -Methodology -The teaching of specific skills and language for specific purposes Thorough investigation and research ensures this journal is: -International in focus, publishing work from countries worldwide -Interdisciplinary, encouraging work which seeks to break down barriers that have isolated language teaching professionals from others concerned with pedagogy -Innovative, seeking to stimulate new avenues of enquiry, including ''action'' research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信