Marta Méndez, Carolina Herranz-Diez, Santiago González, Janisse Ferreri, Josep Maria Calafell, Jordi Otero, Ramon Farre, Salvadora Civico, Francesc Fabregues
{"title":"Comparison of the biomechanical characteristics of human ovarian tissue after vitrification versus slow freezing.","authors":"Marta Méndez, Carolina Herranz-Diez, Santiago González, Janisse Ferreri, Josep Maria Calafell, Jordi Otero, Ramon Farre, Salvadora Civico, Francesc Fabregues","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20250045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Numerous studies have compared ovarian tissue cryopreservation methods, including slow freezing/rapid thawing (SF/RT) and vitrification/warming (V/W), focusing on morpho-functional status, follicle density, stromal cell integrity, and gene expression during in vitro culture. However, results remain inconclusive. This study aims to evaluate the effects of SF/RT and V/W on the ovarian cortex's biomechanical properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Human ovarian biopsies were taken from five women between 32 and 45 years undergoing laparoscopic surgery for tubal sterilization. For each patient, one small sample of fresh tissue was used as control, and the remaining tissue were vitrified or frozen by slow freezing method. The tissue stiffness of the cryopreserved samples at the micrometer scale was measured by Atomic Force Microscopy after thawing and warming, depending of the cryopreservation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median stiffness of the ovarian cortex was 3670.00 Pa (Pascal) (IQR 2146.4) in the control group. After cryopreservation, the median stiffness slightly decreased to 1305.90 Pa (IQR 503.51) with SF/RT and to 2284.50 Pa (IQR 3314.40) with V/W. General linear model analysis revealed no significant effect of cryopreservation method on the ovarian cortex stiffness (F=2.750, p=0.071). No significant differences were observed based on the intra-sample zone studied by AFM. However, a significant inter-patient effect on tissue stiffness was identified (F=3.958, p=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study findings suggest that ovarian tissue freezing methods do not have a relevant impact on functional aspects of the extracellular matrix (ECM), suggesting that given the logistical advantages of vitrification, this technique should be prioritized.</p>","PeriodicalId":520656,"journal":{"name":"JBRA assisted reproduction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBRA assisted reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20250045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Numerous studies have compared ovarian tissue cryopreservation methods, including slow freezing/rapid thawing (SF/RT) and vitrification/warming (V/W), focusing on morpho-functional status, follicle density, stromal cell integrity, and gene expression during in vitro culture. However, results remain inconclusive. This study aims to evaluate the effects of SF/RT and V/W on the ovarian cortex's biomechanical properties.
Methods: Human ovarian biopsies were taken from five women between 32 and 45 years undergoing laparoscopic surgery for tubal sterilization. For each patient, one small sample of fresh tissue was used as control, and the remaining tissue were vitrified or frozen by slow freezing method. The tissue stiffness of the cryopreserved samples at the micrometer scale was measured by Atomic Force Microscopy after thawing and warming, depending of the cryopreservation method.
Results: The median stiffness of the ovarian cortex was 3670.00 Pa (Pascal) (IQR 2146.4) in the control group. After cryopreservation, the median stiffness slightly decreased to 1305.90 Pa (IQR 503.51) with SF/RT and to 2284.50 Pa (IQR 3314.40) with V/W. General linear model analysis revealed no significant effect of cryopreservation method on the ovarian cortex stiffness (F=2.750, p=0.071). No significant differences were observed based on the intra-sample zone studied by AFM. However, a significant inter-patient effect on tissue stiffness was identified (F=3.958, p=0.006).
Conclusions: The study findings suggest that ovarian tissue freezing methods do not have a relevant impact on functional aspects of the extracellular matrix (ECM), suggesting that given the logistical advantages of vitrification, this technique should be prioritized.
目的:许多研究比较了卵巢组织冷冻保存方法,包括慢速冷冻/快速解冻(SF/RT)和玻璃化/加热(V/W),重点关注体外培养过程中的形态功能状态、卵泡密度、基质细胞完整性和基因表达。然而,结果仍然没有定论。本研究旨在探讨SF/RT和V/W对卵巢皮质生物力学性能的影响。方法:对5例32 ~ 45岁输卵管绝育腹腔镜手术患者进行卵巢活检。每位患者取一小块新鲜组织作为对照,其余组织采用玻璃化或慢速冷冻法冷冻。根据不同的低温保存方法,在解冻和加热后,用原子力显微镜测量低温保存样品在微米尺度上的组织刚度。结果:对照组卵巢皮质中位刚度为3670.00 Pa (Pascal) (IQR 2146.4)。低温保存后,SF/RT的中位刚度为1305.90 Pa (IQR为503.51),V/W的中位刚度为2284.50 Pa (IQR为3314.40)。一般线性模型分析显示,冷冻保存方法对卵巢皮质硬度无显著影响(F=2.750, p=0.071)。基于AFM研究的样品内区域,未观察到显著差异。然而,患者间对组织刚度的显著影响被确定(F=3.958, p=0.006)。结论:研究结果表明,卵巢组织冷冻方法对细胞外基质(ECM)的功能方面没有相关影响,这表明考虑到玻璃化冷冻的物流优势,应优先考虑该技术。