Endovascular Management of Common Femoral Artery Occlusion Caused by Suture-mediated Vascular Closure Devices: A Single-Center Experience.

IF 0.7
Young Ha Kim, Lee Hwangbo, Jun Kyeung Ko
{"title":"Endovascular Management of Common Femoral Artery Occlusion Caused by Suture-mediated Vascular Closure Devices: A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Young Ha Kim, Lee Hwangbo, Jun Kyeung Ko","doi":"10.1177/15385744251387755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveVascular closure devices (VCDs) are frequently employed to achieve hemostasis at the femoral puncture site, offering an alternative to traditional manual compression. However, a rare yet significant complication is common femoral artery (CFA) occlusion caused by suture-mediated VCDs. The optimal management of this complication remains unclear, with open surgical repair traditionally regarded as the standard of care. This paper aims to share our clinical experience in managing CFA occlusions caused by suture-mediated VCDs and to introduce our preferred endovascular treatment strategy.MethodsAt our institution, approximately 250 femoral artery hemostasis procedures using suture-mediated VCDs are performed annually. Over the past 10 years, we encountered 6 cases of CFA occlusion following the use of such devices. This corresponds to an incidence rate of approximately 0.24%. In all cases, endovascular management was selected as the primary treatment modality over open surgical intervention. Our endovascular approach consisted of initial balloon angioplasty, with adjunctive stenting performed when residual stenosis exceeded 50%.ResultsEndovascular treatment was technically successful in all 6 cases, with no major procedural complications. The mean degree of stenosis prior to balloon angioplasty was 91.9%, including 3 cases of long segmental occlusion. Balloon angioplasty alone was sufficient in 4 cases, while the remaining 2 required additional stenting to address significant residual stenosis. Final angiography demonstrated an average residual stenosis of 25.1%. During the follow-up period (mean duration: 37.8 months), no patients reported symptoms of lower extremity ischemia.ConclusionThis case series highlights the feasibility and efficacy of endovascular management as a first-line approach for CFA occlusion caused by suture-mediated VCDs. When diagnosis is delayed, long segmental occlusion with considerable thrombus burden may limit the effectiveness of balloon angioplasty alone, necessitating adjunctive stenting. Therefore, timely diagnosis and intervention are essential to optimize outcomes in these cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15385744251387755"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251387755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveVascular closure devices (VCDs) are frequently employed to achieve hemostasis at the femoral puncture site, offering an alternative to traditional manual compression. However, a rare yet significant complication is common femoral artery (CFA) occlusion caused by suture-mediated VCDs. The optimal management of this complication remains unclear, with open surgical repair traditionally regarded as the standard of care. This paper aims to share our clinical experience in managing CFA occlusions caused by suture-mediated VCDs and to introduce our preferred endovascular treatment strategy.MethodsAt our institution, approximately 250 femoral artery hemostasis procedures using suture-mediated VCDs are performed annually. Over the past 10 years, we encountered 6 cases of CFA occlusion following the use of such devices. This corresponds to an incidence rate of approximately 0.24%. In all cases, endovascular management was selected as the primary treatment modality over open surgical intervention. Our endovascular approach consisted of initial balloon angioplasty, with adjunctive stenting performed when residual stenosis exceeded 50%.ResultsEndovascular treatment was technically successful in all 6 cases, with no major procedural complications. The mean degree of stenosis prior to balloon angioplasty was 91.9%, including 3 cases of long segmental occlusion. Balloon angioplasty alone was sufficient in 4 cases, while the remaining 2 required additional stenting to address significant residual stenosis. Final angiography demonstrated an average residual stenosis of 25.1%. During the follow-up period (mean duration: 37.8 months), no patients reported symptoms of lower extremity ischemia.ConclusionThis case series highlights the feasibility and efficacy of endovascular management as a first-line approach for CFA occlusion caused by suture-mediated VCDs. When diagnosis is delayed, long segmental occlusion with considerable thrombus burden may limit the effectiveness of balloon angioplasty alone, necessitating adjunctive stenting. Therefore, timely diagnosis and intervention are essential to optimize outcomes in these cases.

由缝合线介导的血管关闭装置引起的股总动脉闭塞的血管内治疗:单中心经验。
目的血管闭合装置(vcd)被广泛用于股骨穿刺处止血,为传统的手工压迫提供了一种替代方法。然而,一种罕见但重要的并发症是由缝线介导的vcd引起的股总动脉(CFA)闭塞。这种并发症的最佳处理方法尚不清楚,传统上认为开放手术修复是标准的治疗方法。本文旨在分享我们处理由缝合线介导的vcd引起的CFA闭塞的临床经验,并介绍我们首选的血管内治疗策略。方法在我院,每年使用缝线介导的vcd进行约250例股动脉止血手术。在过去的10年里,我们遇到了6例使用这种装置后的CFA闭塞。这相当于发病率约为0.24%。在所有病例中,血管内管理被选择为开放手术干预的主要治疗方式。我们的血管内入路包括最初的球囊血管成形术,当残余狭窄超过50%时进行辅助支架置入。结果6例患者手术治疗均成功,无重大手术并发症。球囊成形术前平均狭窄程度为91.9%,包括3例长节段闭塞。4例仅球囊血管成形术就足够了,而其余2例需要额外的支架植入来解决明显的残余狭窄。最终血管造影显示平均残余狭窄为25.1%。在随访期间(平均37.8个月),无患者报告下肢缺血症状。结论本病例系列强调了血管内治疗作为一线治疗由缝合线介导的vcd引起的CFA闭塞的可行性和有效性。当诊断延迟时,长节段性闭塞和大量血栓负担可能限制单独球囊血管成形术的有效性,需要辅助支架置入。因此,及时诊断和干预对于优化这些病例的预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信