Optimizing Endovascular Aortic Repair With Carbon Dioxide: A Systematic Review Toward Zero Contrast Use.

IF 0.7
Luca Felici, Vincenzo Vento, Alberto Davì, Luca Montecchiani, Andrea Xodo, Laura Maria Cacioppa, Chiara Floridi, Louis Magnus, Emanuele Gatta, Emiliano Chisci
{"title":"Optimizing Endovascular Aortic Repair With Carbon Dioxide: A Systematic Review Toward Zero Contrast Use.","authors":"Luca Felici, Vincenzo Vento, Alberto Davì, Luca Montecchiani, Andrea Xodo, Laura Maria Cacioppa, Chiara Floridi, Louis Magnus, Emanuele Gatta, Emiliano Chisci","doi":"10.1177/15385744251387760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) is a proven, safe, and effective treatment; however, its application may be limited by the potential adverse effects of iodinated contrast medium (ICM), which can exacerbate renal function and may be contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency. <b>Purpose:</b> This review aims to provide an overview of \"zero-iodine contrast EVAR,\" which uses CO<sub>2</sub> exclusively, as a strategy to mitigate the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with ICM. <b>Research design:</b> A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify EVAR cases performed using carbon dioxide. The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms used were \"endovascular repair AND abdominal aortic aneurysm AND contrast medium\" and \"endovascular repair AND abdominal aortic aneurysm AND carbon dioxide,\" with inclusion criteria limited to articles in English published until December 2024. <b>Results:</b> The literature search yielded 1167 papers. After removing duplicates, titles and abstracts were screened, and 68 papers underwent full-text review. A total of 16 studies were included in the analysis, encompassing 1625 patients. Of these, 837 patients underwent EVAR with ICM, and 788 patients underwent EVAR with CO<sub>2</sub>. Of these, 510 patients were treated with EVAR using CO<sub>2</sub> exclusively. <b>Conclusions:</b> Although this method still faces inherent limitations due to the physicochemical characteristics of CO<sub>2</sub>, its use, when combined with additional technical precautions, enables the achievement of zero-contrast results in standard EVAR procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15385744251387760"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251387760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) is a proven, safe, and effective treatment; however, its application may be limited by the potential adverse effects of iodinated contrast medium (ICM), which can exacerbate renal function and may be contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency. Purpose: This review aims to provide an overview of "zero-iodine contrast EVAR," which uses CO2 exclusively, as a strategy to mitigate the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with ICM. Research design: A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify EVAR cases performed using carbon dioxide. The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms used were "endovascular repair AND abdominal aortic aneurysm AND contrast medium" and "endovascular repair AND abdominal aortic aneurysm AND carbon dioxide," with inclusion criteria limited to articles in English published until December 2024. Results: The literature search yielded 1167 papers. After removing duplicates, titles and abstracts were screened, and 68 papers underwent full-text review. A total of 16 studies were included in the analysis, encompassing 1625 patients. Of these, 837 patients underwent EVAR with ICM, and 788 patients underwent EVAR with CO2. Of these, 510 patients were treated with EVAR using CO2 exclusively. Conclusions: Although this method still faces inherent limitations due to the physicochemical characteristics of CO2, its use, when combined with additional technical precautions, enables the achievement of zero-contrast results in standard EVAR procedures.

优化血管内主动脉修复二氧化碳:零对比使用的系统回顾。
背景:血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)是一种成熟、安全、有效的治疗方法;然而,其应用可能受到碘化造影剂(ICM)潜在不良反应的限制,ICM可加重肾功能,可能是肾功能不全患者的禁忌症。目的:本综述旨在提供“零碘造影剂EVAR”的概述,该方法仅使用CO2作为减轻与ICM相关的急性肾损伤(AKI)风险的策略。研究设计:根据PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南,在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库中进行了系统的文献综述,以确定使用二氧化碳进行的EVAR病例。使用的医学主题标题(MeSH)术语是“血管内修复、腹主动脉瘤和造影剂”和“血管内修复、腹主动脉瘤和二氧化碳”,纳入标准仅限于2024年12月前发表的英文文章。结果:检索到文献1167篇。在删除重复后,对标题和摘要进行筛选,并对68篇论文进行全文审查。该分析共纳入了16项研究,涉及1625名患者。其中,837例患者行ICM组EVAR, 788例患者行CO2组EVAR。其中510例患者仅使用CO2进行EVAR治疗。结论:尽管由于CO2的物理化学特性,该方法仍然面临固有的局限性,但结合额外的技术预防措施,它的使用可以在标准EVAR程序中实现零对比结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信