Evaluation of the antimicrobial potential of fluoride-free mouthwashes against Scardovia wiggsiae.

IF 2
A C Valdivia-Tapia, F Lippert, R L Gregory
{"title":"Evaluation of the antimicrobial potential of fluoride-free mouthwashes against Scardovia wiggsiae.","authors":"A C Valdivia-Tapia, F Lippert, R L Gregory","doi":"10.1007/s40368-025-01116-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of fluoride-free mouthwashes against Scardovia wiggsiae, a key bacterium associated with fluoride-resistant dental caries. The investigation focused on bacterial growth inhibition, planktonic cell viability, and biofilm formation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve commercially available fluoride-free mouthwashes with various active ingredients, including hydrogen peroxide, cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), essential oils, and organic extracts, were tested. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) assays were conducted to determine bacterial growth inhibition and killing potential. Planktonic cell viability and biofilm formation assays were performed at three dilutions (1:3, 1:6, and 1:12) using a 16-h culture of S. wiggsiae. Optical density (OD) values were measured at 595 nm for planktonic cells and 490 nm for biofilms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant variability was observed in bacterial inhibition among mouthwashes. Hydrogen peroxide- and CPC-based formulations demonstrated the strongest antimicrobial activity, significantly reducing bacterial growth, planktonic viability, and biofilm formation. Essential oil-based formulations exhibited moderate antimicrobial effects, with reduced efficacy at higher dilutions. Organic-based mouthwashes showed limited inhibition, while formulations containing zinc chloride and stabilised chlorine dioxide demonstrated the weakest effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hydrogen peroxide- and CPC-containing mouthwashes exhibited the highest antimicrobial potential against S. wiggsiae and may serve as effective fluoride-free alternatives for high-risk populations. Essential oil-based formulations provided moderate benefits, whereas zinc chloride and chlorine dioxide showed minimal efficacy. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate antimicrobial agents for biofilm control and caries prevention. Further in vivo studies are necessary to validate long-term effectiveness in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":520615,"journal":{"name":"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-025-01116-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of fluoride-free mouthwashes against Scardovia wiggsiae, a key bacterium associated with fluoride-resistant dental caries. The investigation focused on bacterial growth inhibition, planktonic cell viability, and biofilm formation.

Methods: Twelve commercially available fluoride-free mouthwashes with various active ingredients, including hydrogen peroxide, cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), essential oils, and organic extracts, were tested. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) assays were conducted to determine bacterial growth inhibition and killing potential. Planktonic cell viability and biofilm formation assays were performed at three dilutions (1:3, 1:6, and 1:12) using a 16-h culture of S. wiggsiae. Optical density (OD) values were measured at 595 nm for planktonic cells and 490 nm for biofilms.

Results: Significant variability was observed in bacterial inhibition among mouthwashes. Hydrogen peroxide- and CPC-based formulations demonstrated the strongest antimicrobial activity, significantly reducing bacterial growth, planktonic viability, and biofilm formation. Essential oil-based formulations exhibited moderate antimicrobial effects, with reduced efficacy at higher dilutions. Organic-based mouthwashes showed limited inhibition, while formulations containing zinc chloride and stabilised chlorine dioxide demonstrated the weakest effects.

Conclusion: Hydrogen peroxide- and CPC-containing mouthwashes exhibited the highest antimicrobial potential against S. wiggsiae and may serve as effective fluoride-free alternatives for high-risk populations. Essential oil-based formulations provided moderate benefits, whereas zinc chloride and chlorine dioxide showed minimal efficacy. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate antimicrobial agents for biofilm control and caries prevention. Further in vivo studies are necessary to validate long-term effectiveness in clinical settings.

无氟漱口水对斯卡杜氏菌抗菌潜力的评价。
目的:评价无氟漱口水对耐氟性龋齿的主要病原菌斯卡多维亚菌的抗菌效果。研究的重点是细菌生长抑制、浮游细胞活力和生物膜的形成。方法:对12种市售无氟漱口水进行了测试,这些漱口水含有各种有效成分,包括过氧化氢、十六烷基氯化吡啶(CPC)、精油和有机提取物。最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和最低杀菌浓度(MBC)测定细菌生长抑制和杀灭潜力。在三种稀释(1:3,1:6和1:12)下进行浮游细胞活力和生物膜形成试验,培养16小时。浮游细胞在595 nm处测光密度,生物膜在490 nm处测光密度。结果:不同漱口水对细菌的抑制作用有显著差异。过氧化氢和cpc为基础的配方显示出最强的抗菌活性,显著降低细菌生长,浮游生物活力和生物膜的形成。以精油为基础的配方表现出适度的抗菌效果,在较高的稀释度下效果降低。有机漱口水显示出有限的抑制作用,而含有氯化锌和稳定二氧化氯的配方显示出最弱的效果。结论:含双氧水和氯化碳漱口水对威氏葡萄球菌的抗菌潜力最大,可作为高风险人群有效的无氟漱口水替代品。以精油为基础的配方提供了适度的效果,而氯化锌和二氧化氯的效果则微乎其微。这些发现强调了选择合适的抗菌药物对控制生物膜和预防龋齿的重要性。需要进一步的体内研究来验证临床环境中的长期有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信