Unveiling the relationship between aesthetic experiences and attention through a cross-experiment validation of their processing biomarkers.

IF 3.8 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PNAS nexus Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf288
Paolo Barbieri, Martina Berto, Pietro Sarasso, Jacopo Frascaroli, Giacomo Handjaras, Francesca Piovesan, Giorgio Gnecco, Davide Bottari, Irene Ronga
{"title":"Unveiling the relationship between aesthetic experiences and attention through a cross-experiment validation of their processing biomarkers.","authors":"Paolo Barbieri, Martina Berto, Pietro Sarasso, Jacopo Frascaroli, Giacomo Handjaras, Francesca Piovesan, Giorgio Gnecco, Davide Bottari, Irene Ronga","doi":"10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A centuries-old tradition encompassing philosophy, psychology, and artistic practice describes aesthetic experiences as characterized by a special state of heightened attention toward external stimuli (i.e. an \"aesthetic attitude\"). In recent years, this view has motivated wide-ranging claims about the nature of our aesthetic encounters and the cognitive benefits of exposure to art. Despite sustained efforts from a growing stream of interdisciplinary research, however, it is still unclear whether aesthetic experiences can be systematically linked to observable attentional enhancements. In this study, we address this long-standing question using electroencephalography (EEG) and advanced machine learning (ML) techniques. We performed a series of EEG experiments measuring brain activity elicited by synthetic and natural images during an aesthetic (beauty judgments) and a pragmatic (symmetry judgments) task. Visual evoked potentials and neural oscillations were used to assess whether the aesthetic task induces attentional enhancements. In line with our hypotheses, the power of alpha and beta prestimulus oscillations significantly decreased in the aesthetic vs. pragmatic task. Furthermore, larger late positive potentials and N170 responses (the latter for natural images only) were found in the aesthetic vs. pragmatic task. ML analyses further showed that prestimulus neural oscillations and N170 responses were systematically able to predict the type of task. Overall, our results highlight the presence of a perceptual processing enhancement and a heightened state of attention in aesthetic contexts. The upshot is a clearer understanding of the dynamics and neural underpinnings of our aesthetic experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":74468,"journal":{"name":"PNAS nexus","volume":"4 10","pages":"pgaf288"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PNAS nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A centuries-old tradition encompassing philosophy, psychology, and artistic practice describes aesthetic experiences as characterized by a special state of heightened attention toward external stimuli (i.e. an "aesthetic attitude"). In recent years, this view has motivated wide-ranging claims about the nature of our aesthetic encounters and the cognitive benefits of exposure to art. Despite sustained efforts from a growing stream of interdisciplinary research, however, it is still unclear whether aesthetic experiences can be systematically linked to observable attentional enhancements. In this study, we address this long-standing question using electroencephalography (EEG) and advanced machine learning (ML) techniques. We performed a series of EEG experiments measuring brain activity elicited by synthetic and natural images during an aesthetic (beauty judgments) and a pragmatic (symmetry judgments) task. Visual evoked potentials and neural oscillations were used to assess whether the aesthetic task induces attentional enhancements. In line with our hypotheses, the power of alpha and beta prestimulus oscillations significantly decreased in the aesthetic vs. pragmatic task. Furthermore, larger late positive potentials and N170 responses (the latter for natural images only) were found in the aesthetic vs. pragmatic task. ML analyses further showed that prestimulus neural oscillations and N170 responses were systematically able to predict the type of task. Overall, our results highlight the presence of a perceptual processing enhancement and a heightened state of attention in aesthetic contexts. The upshot is a clearer understanding of the dynamics and neural underpinnings of our aesthetic experiences.

通过对审美体验和注意力加工生物标志物的交叉实验验证揭示两者之间的关系。
一个包含哲学、心理学和艺术实践的古老传统将审美体验描述为一种对外部刺激高度关注的特殊状态(即“审美态度”)。近年来,这一观点引发了关于我们审美接触的本质以及接触艺术的认知益处的广泛主张。尽管越来越多的跨学科研究做出了持续的努力,但审美体验是否与可观察到的注意力增强有系统的联系仍不清楚。在这项研究中,我们使用脑电图(EEG)和先进的机器学习(ML)技术来解决这个长期存在的问题。我们进行了一系列脑电图实验,测量在审美(美判断)和实用(对称判断)任务中合成和自然图像引起的大脑活动。使用视觉诱发电位和神经振荡来评估审美任务是否引起注意增强。与我们的假设一致,在审美任务和实用任务中,α和β前刺激振荡的功率显着降低。此外,在审美任务和语用任务中发现了更大的后期正电位和N170反应(后者仅用于自然图像)。ML分析进一步表明,刺激前神经振荡和N170反应能够系统地预测任务类型。总的来说,我们的研究结果强调了在审美环境中感知加工的增强和注意力状态的提高。其结果是对我们审美体验的动态和神经基础有了更清晰的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信