Melatonin improved the outcomes of women with ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in reproductive health Pub Date : 2025-09-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frph.2025.1680984
Yilin Wu, Wenjie Huang, Li Tang, Yuelin Feng, Hongqing Chen, Mingxin Pan, Jingrong Peng, Chen Li, Huawei Wang
{"title":"Melatonin improved the outcomes of women with ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.","authors":"Yilin Wu, Wenjie Huang, Li Tang, Yuelin Feng, Hongqing Chen, Mingxin Pan, Jingrong Peng, Chen Li, Huawei Wang","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1680984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate whether the melatonin supplementation could improve the embryo development and pregnancy outcomes of infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (ART).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251003042). The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before March 5, 2025 are included to evaluate the efficacy of melatonin on infertile women undergoing ART. Eligible studies reported at least one embryo development or pregnancy-related outcome. Primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate; secondary outcomes including oocyte yield, fertilization rate, MII oocyte number, and high-quality embryo formation. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on stimulation protocols, melatonin dosage, and population characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and pooled effect sizes were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models depending on heterogeneity. Totally, eleven RCTs with a total of 1,481 participants were analyzed here.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Melatonin supplementation significantly improved clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.22-2.07). Regarding embryo development, melatonin significantly increased the number of high-quality embryos (MD = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.07-0.79), MII oocyte (SMD=0.99, 95% CI: 0.29-1.69), and fertilization rates (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.01-1.73). No significant difference was observed in oocyte yield (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.94). Subgroup analysis revealed enhanced clinical pregnancy outcomes with ≤3 mg/day melatonin and under GnRH-a long protocols. Moderate to high heterogeneity was observed in some secondary outcomes, with publication bias suggested for the MII oocyte outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Melatonin supplementation may improve intermediate outcomes such as fertilization, embryo quality, and clinical pregnancy rates in women undergoing ART. With a favorable safety profile, it could be a low-cost adjunct for selected patients, though standardized guidelines are lacking and large-scale RCTs are needed to clarify long-term effects.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420251003042, PROSPERO CRD420251003042.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1680984"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12500685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2025.1680984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate whether the melatonin supplementation could improve the embryo development and pregnancy outcomes of infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (ART).

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251003042). The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before March 5, 2025 are included to evaluate the efficacy of melatonin on infertile women undergoing ART. Eligible studies reported at least one embryo development or pregnancy-related outcome. Primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate; secondary outcomes including oocyte yield, fertilization rate, MII oocyte number, and high-quality embryo formation. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on stimulation protocols, melatonin dosage, and population characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and pooled effect sizes were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models depending on heterogeneity. Totally, eleven RCTs with a total of 1,481 participants were analyzed here.

Data sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library.

Results: Melatonin supplementation significantly improved clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.22-2.07). Regarding embryo development, melatonin significantly increased the number of high-quality embryos (MD = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.07-0.79), MII oocyte (SMD=0.99, 95% CI: 0.29-1.69), and fertilization rates (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.01-1.73). No significant difference was observed in oocyte yield (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.94). Subgroup analysis revealed enhanced clinical pregnancy outcomes with ≤3 mg/day melatonin and under GnRH-a long protocols. Moderate to high heterogeneity was observed in some secondary outcomes, with publication bias suggested for the MII oocyte outcome.

Conclusions: Melatonin supplementation may improve intermediate outcomes such as fertilization, embryo quality, and clinical pregnancy rates in women undergoing ART. With a favorable safety profile, it could be a low-cost adjunct for selected patients, though standardized guidelines are lacking and large-scale RCTs are needed to clarify long-term effects.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420251003042, PROSPERO CRD420251003042.

褪黑素改善了接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的妇女的预后:随机试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:系统评价补充褪黑素是否能改善接受辅助生殖技术(ART)的不孕妇女的胚胎发育和妊娠结局。方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析遵循PRISMA指南,并在PROSPERO前瞻性注册(CRD420251003042)。纳入2025年3月5日前发表的随机对照试验(RCTs),以评估褪黑素对接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的不孕妇女的疗效。符合条件的研究报告了至少一个胚胎发育或妊娠相关的结果。主要结局为临床妊娠率;次要结局包括卵母细胞产量、受精率、MII卵母细胞数量和高质量胚胎形成。亚组分析是根据刺激方案、褪黑激素剂量和群体特征进行的。使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具评估偏倚风险,并根据异质性使用固定或随机效应模型计算汇总效应大小。本研究共分析了11项随机对照试验,共1481名参与者。数据来源:PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase和Cochrane图书馆。结果:补充褪黑素可显著提高临床妊娠率(OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.22-2.07)。在胚胎发育方面,褪黑激素显著增加了优质胚胎数量(MD = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.07-0.79)、MII卵母细胞(SMD=0.99, 95% CI: 0.29-1.69)和受精率(OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.01-1.73)。卵母细胞产量差异无统计学意义(SMD = 0.45, 95% CI: -0.04 ~ 0.94)。亚组分析显示,在GnRH-a长期方案下,褪黑素≤3mg /d可提高临床妊娠结局。在一些次要结果中观察到中度至高度异质性,MII卵母细胞结果存在发表偏倚。结论:补充褪黑素可以改善接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的妇女的中间结局,如受精、胚胎质量和临床妊娠率。由于具有良好的安全性,对于特定的患者来说,它可能是一种低成本的辅助手段,尽管缺乏标准化的指导方针,并且需要大规模的随机对照试验来明确长期效果。系统评价注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420251003042, PROSPERO CRD420251003042。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信