Long-Term Survival Advantage of Total Arterial Revascularization in Elderly Patients Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Justin Ren, Christopher M Reid, Julian A Smith, Colin Royse, Dion Stub, Wiliam Chan, David M Kaye, Jason E Bloom, Nilesh Srivastav, Andrea Bowyer, David H Tian, Lavinia Tran, Jenni Williams-Spence, Doa El-Ansary, Alistair Royse
{"title":"Long-Term Survival Advantage of Total Arterial Revascularization in Elderly Patients Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.","authors":"Justin Ren, Christopher M Reid, Julian A Smith, Colin Royse, Dion Stub, Wiliam Chan, David M Kaye, Jason E Bloom, Nilesh Srivastav, Andrea Bowyer, David H Tian, Lavinia Tran, Jenni Williams-Spence, Doa El-Ansary, Alistair Royse","doi":"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the evidence of clinical benefit, total arterial revascularization (TAR) remains underutilized in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting due to concerns about perceived surgical complexity and limited life expectancy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of the study was to evaluate long-term survival of TAR vs conventional non-TAR grafting strategies in elderly (≥70 years) and younger (<70 years) patients using a binational cardiac surgery registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included patients who underwent primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with at least 2 grafts between 2001 and 2020. The endpoint was long-term all-cause mortality. Patients were stratified into 2 age groups, <70 years and ≥70 years. Within each cohort, survival outcomes were compared between those who received TAR, and those who received non-TAR involving at least 1 saphenous vein graft. Secondary analyses further divided the non-TAR group into patients receiving multiple arterial grafting or single arterial grafting. Baseline differences were adjusted using inverse probability treatment weighting, followed by Cox proportional hazard modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 59,641 patients, TAR was associated with significantly improved survival compared to non-TAR in both elderly (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.81-0.92; P < 0.001) and younger age groups (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73-0.88; P < 0.001). A clear hierarchy in survival was also demonstrated, with the highest survival observed in patients undergoing TAR, followed by non-TAR-multiple arterial grafting, and the lowest in those receiving non-TAR-single arterial grafting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAR improves long-term survival in both elderly and younger patients. These findings challenge the assumption that limited life expectancy precludes arterial grafting and support broader implementation of TAR in appropriately selected older patients. Randomized clinical trials evaluating TAR are warranted to validate these observational findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73527,"journal":{"name":"JACC advances","volume":" ","pages":"102226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the evidence of clinical benefit, total arterial revascularization (TAR) remains underutilized in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting due to concerns about perceived surgical complexity and limited life expectancy.

Objectives: The objective of the study was to evaluate long-term survival of TAR vs conventional non-TAR grafting strategies in elderly (≥70 years) and younger (<70 years) patients using a binational cardiac surgery registry.

Methods: The study included patients who underwent primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with at least 2 grafts between 2001 and 2020. The endpoint was long-term all-cause mortality. Patients were stratified into 2 age groups, <70 years and ≥70 years. Within each cohort, survival outcomes were compared between those who received TAR, and those who received non-TAR involving at least 1 saphenous vein graft. Secondary analyses further divided the non-TAR group into patients receiving multiple arterial grafting or single arterial grafting. Baseline differences were adjusted using inverse probability treatment weighting, followed by Cox proportional hazard modeling.

Results: Among 59,641 patients, TAR was associated with significantly improved survival compared to non-TAR in both elderly (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.81-0.92; P < 0.001) and younger age groups (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73-0.88; P < 0.001). A clear hierarchy in survival was also demonstrated, with the highest survival observed in patients undergoing TAR, followed by non-TAR-multiple arterial grafting, and the lowest in those receiving non-TAR-single arterial grafting.

Conclusions: TAR improves long-term survival in both elderly and younger patients. These findings challenge the assumption that limited life expectancy precludes arterial grafting and support broader implementation of TAR in appropriately selected older patients. Randomized clinical trials evaluating TAR are warranted to validate these observational findings.

老年冠状动脉搭桥术后全动脉血运重建术的长期生存优势。
背景:尽管有临床益处的证据,但由于担心手术复杂性和预期寿命有限,全动脉血运重建术(TAR)在接受冠状动脉搭桥术的老年患者中的应用仍然不足。目的:本研究的目的是评估老年人(≥70岁)和年轻人的TAR与传统非TAR移植策略的长期生存率(方法:研究包括2001年至2020年期间接受过至少2次原发性孤立冠状动脉搭桥术的患者。终点是长期全因死亡率。结果:在59,641例患者中,老年人(HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.81-0.92; P < 0.001)和年轻年龄组(HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73-0.88; P < 0.001)与非TAR患者相比,TAR显著提高了生存率。生存率也有明显的等级差异,接受TAR的患者生存率最高,其次是非TAR的多路动脉移植,而接受非TAR的单路动脉移植的患者生存率最低。结论:TAR可提高老年和年轻患者的长期生存率。这些发现挑战了预期寿命有限排除动脉移植的假设,并支持在适当选择的老年患者中更广泛地实施TAR。评估TAR的随机临床试验有必要验证这些观察性发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC advances
JACC advances Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信