Lower limb biomechanical differences in runners with long-duration and short-duration patellofemoral pain

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Knee Pub Date : 2025-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2025.09.003
Huijuan Shi , Yuanyuan Yu , Shuang Ren , Shengxing Fu , Hanjun Li , Hui Liu
{"title":"Lower limb biomechanical differences in runners with long-duration and short-duration patellofemoral pain","authors":"Huijuan Shi ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Yu ,&nbsp;Shuang Ren ,&nbsp;Shengxing Fu ,&nbsp;Hanjun Li ,&nbsp;Hui Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To investigate the biomechanical alterations in the lower limbs of runners with varying durations of patellofemoral pain (PFP) and provide a basis for the rehabilitation treatment of PFP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We recruited 14 recreational runners with PFP lasting more than 12 months (long-duration group), 12 runners with PFP lasting less than 3 months (short-duration group), and 16 runners without PFP (control group). Landmark coordinates and ground reaction forces during running were collected. One-way ANOVA was performed to compare the lower limb biomechanics among the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to the control group, the long-duration group demonstrated significantly greater peak knee external rotation angle (<em>p</em> = 0.010), knee abduction moment (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), hip abduction moment (<em>p</em> = 0.007), and ankle external rotation moment (<em>p</em> = 0.004). The short-duration group showed significantly greater peak ankle eversion angle (<em>p</em> = 0.004) and ankle dorsiflexion–plantarflexion range of motion (<em>p</em> = 0.003) compared to the controls. No significant differences were found in peak vertical impact ground reaction forces (<em>p</em> = 0.906) or peak patellofemoral joint stress (<em>p</em> = 0.150) during the landing phase between runners with PFP and controls.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Runners with long-duration PFP exhibited greater external knee rotation angles, knee and hip abduction moments during running, while runners with shorter PFP duration showed greater ankle eversion. These findings support the need for duration-specific rehabilitation strategies tailored to the distinct biomechanical characteristics associated with PFP symptom duration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"57 ","pages":"Pages 361-369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096801602500242X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To investigate the biomechanical alterations in the lower limbs of runners with varying durations of patellofemoral pain (PFP) and provide a basis for the rehabilitation treatment of PFP.

Methods

We recruited 14 recreational runners with PFP lasting more than 12 months (long-duration group), 12 runners with PFP lasting less than 3 months (short-duration group), and 16 runners without PFP (control group). Landmark coordinates and ground reaction forces during running were collected. One-way ANOVA was performed to compare the lower limb biomechanics among the groups.

Results

Compared to the control group, the long-duration group demonstrated significantly greater peak knee external rotation angle (p = 0.010), knee abduction moment (p < 0.001), hip abduction moment (p = 0.007), and ankle external rotation moment (p = 0.004). The short-duration group showed significantly greater peak ankle eversion angle (p = 0.004) and ankle dorsiflexion–plantarflexion range of motion (p = 0.003) compared to the controls. No significant differences were found in peak vertical impact ground reaction forces (p = 0.906) or peak patellofemoral joint stress (p = 0.150) during the landing phase between runners with PFP and controls.

Conclusions

Runners with long-duration PFP exhibited greater external knee rotation angles, knee and hip abduction moments during running, while runners with shorter PFP duration showed greater ankle eversion. These findings support the need for duration-specific rehabilitation strategies tailored to the distinct biomechanical characteristics associated with PFP symptom duration.
长时间和短时间髌骨痛跑步者下肢生物力学的差异。
背景:探讨跑步者不同持续时间髌骨股痛(PFP)的下肢生物力学变化,为PFP的康复治疗提供依据。方法:我们招募了14名PFP持续时间超过12个月的休闲跑步者(长时间组),12名PFP持续时间小于3个月的跑步者(短时间组)和16名无PFP的跑步者(对照组)。收集了运行过程中的地标坐标和地面反作用力。采用单因素方差分析比较各组下肢生物力学性能。结果:与对照组相比,长时间PFP组表现出更大的膝关节外旋峰值角度(p = 0.010)和膝关节外展力矩(p)。结论:长时间PFP组在跑步过程中表现出更大的膝关节外旋角度、膝关节和髋关节外展力矩,而短时间PFP组在跑步过程中表现出更大的踝关节外翻。这些发现支持需要针对与PFP症状持续时间相关的不同生物力学特征量身定制特定时间的康复策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Knee
Knee 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee. The topics covered include, but are not limited to: • Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry; • Biomechanical studies; • Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices; • Imaging and diagnostic techniques; • Pathology; • Trauma; • Surgery; • Rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信