Optimising clinical trial methods for complex regional pain syndrome: a methodological framework (OptiMeth-CRPS).

IF 4.3 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Pain Reports Pub Date : 2025-10-03 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001320
Keith M Smart, Victoria Abbott-Fleming, Frank Birklein, Stephen Bruehl, Erica Corcoran, Simon Day, Michael C Ferraro, Sharon Grieve, Ralf-Dieter Hilgers, Carolyn Ingram, David J Keene, Franz König, Candida McCabe, Stavros Nikolakopoulos, Neil E O'Connell
{"title":"Optimising clinical trial methods for complex regional pain syndrome: a methodological framework (OptiMeth-CRPS).","authors":"Keith M Smart, Victoria Abbott-Fleming, Frank Birklein, Stephen Bruehl, Erica Corcoran, Simon Day, Michael C Ferraro, Sharon Grieve, Ralf-Dieter Hilgers, Carolyn Ingram, David J Keene, Franz König, Candida McCabe, Stavros Nikolakopoulos, Neil E O'Connell","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a rare, disabling pain disorder. Systematic reviews have identified a critical lack of high-quality clinical trial evidence to inform the management of CRPS. There is an urgent need to find solutions to the methodological challenges of undertaking clinical trials in CRPS. The aim of this project was to develop a methodological framework for optimising future clinical trials in CRPS (OptiMeth-CRPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international network with expertise in the lived experience of CRPS, CRPS trials and evidence synthesis, and rare disease trial methods developed the framework using an \"Experience and expertise\" approach through an iterative process of (1) online and face-to-face meetings, (2) reviewing and approving meeting notes, and (3) revising draft manuscripts to develop the framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The OptiMeth-CRPS methodological framework presents 9 key optimisation strategies for improving the methodological quality of CRPS trials. These include strategies for optimising (1) the trial team, (2) research questions, (3) trial governance and management, (4) trial design, (5) the trial population, (6) intervention and comparator groups, (7) trial outcomes, (8) data analysis, and (9) openness, transparency, and reporting. We highlight those optimisation strategies that specifically address the challenges of undertaking clinical trials in people with CRPS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A methodological framework for optimising clinical trials in CRPS has been developed. The OptiMeth-CRPS methodological framework may support the CRPS research community to undertake high-quality clinical trials and improve the quality of the evidence on which clinical decisions and guidelines for the management of CRPS are based.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"10 6","pages":"e1320"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a rare, disabling pain disorder. Systematic reviews have identified a critical lack of high-quality clinical trial evidence to inform the management of CRPS. There is an urgent need to find solutions to the methodological challenges of undertaking clinical trials in CRPS. The aim of this project was to develop a methodological framework for optimising future clinical trials in CRPS (OptiMeth-CRPS).

Methods: An international network with expertise in the lived experience of CRPS, CRPS trials and evidence synthesis, and rare disease trial methods developed the framework using an "Experience and expertise" approach through an iterative process of (1) online and face-to-face meetings, (2) reviewing and approving meeting notes, and (3) revising draft manuscripts to develop the framework.

Results: The OptiMeth-CRPS methodological framework presents 9 key optimisation strategies for improving the methodological quality of CRPS trials. These include strategies for optimising (1) the trial team, (2) research questions, (3) trial governance and management, (4) trial design, (5) the trial population, (6) intervention and comparator groups, (7) trial outcomes, (8) data analysis, and (9) openness, transparency, and reporting. We highlight those optimisation strategies that specifically address the challenges of undertaking clinical trials in people with CRPS.

Conclusion: A methodological framework for optimising clinical trials in CRPS has been developed. The OptiMeth-CRPS methodological framework may support the CRPS research community to undertake high-quality clinical trials and improve the quality of the evidence on which clinical decisions and guidelines for the management of CRPS are based.

Abstract Image

优化复杂局部疼痛综合征的临床试验方法:一个方法学框架(OptiMeth-CRPS)。
复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)是一种罕见的致残性疼痛障碍。系统评价发现严重缺乏高质量的临床试验证据来指导CRPS的管理。迫切需要找到解决在CRPS中进行临床试验的方法挑战的方法。该项目的目的是开发一个方法框架,以优化未来的CRPS临床试验(OptiMeth-CRPS)。方法:一个拥有CRPS生活经验、CRPS试验和证据综合以及罕见病试验方法专业知识的国际网络,通过(1)在线和面对面会议、(2)审查和批准会议记录、(3)修改草稿稿的迭代过程,采用“经验和专业知识”的方法制定了框架。结果:OptiMeth-CRPS方法学框架提出了提高CRPS试验方法学质量的9个关键优化策略。这些策略包括优化(1)试验团队,(2)研究问题,(3)试验治理和管理,(4)试验设计,(5)试验人群,(6)干预和比较组,(7)试验结果,(8)数据分析,以及(9)开放性、透明度和报告。我们强调那些优化策略,专门解决在CRPS患者中进行临床试验的挑战。结论:已经建立了优化CRPS临床试验的方法学框架。OptiMeth-CRPS方法框架可以支持CRPS研究界开展高质量的临床试验,并提高CRPS临床决策和管理指南所依据的证据质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书