Treatments for social cognitive difficulties following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Holly Emery, Skye McDonald, Dana Wong, Sarah Carrier, Paul Gertler, Grahame Simpson, Tamara Ownsworth, Jacinta Douglas, Travis Wearne, Sarah Skromanis, Cynthia A Honan
{"title":"Treatments for social cognitive difficulties following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Holly Emery, Skye McDonald, Dana Wong, Sarah Carrier, Paul Gertler, Grahame Simpson, Tamara Ownsworth, Jacinta Douglas, Travis Wearne, Sarah Skromanis, Cynthia A Honan","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2025.2558883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interventions targeting social cognition following moderate-to-severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) have shown some benefit, however, there remains a need to systematically review, statistically synthesize, and evaluate these interventions to inform the development of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Six databases were searched from inception to May 2024. Eligible studies targeted adults with a moderate-to-severe TBI (P); evaluated interventions targeting social cognition (I); compared to a control, baseline performance, or phase without treatment (C); based on objective social-cognitive ability/performance (O). Studies were screened by two independent reviewers. A random effects model estimated treatment effects for RCTs (Hedge's <i>g</i>) and observational (pre-post) studies (SMD) separately. Risk of bias was assessed. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Twenty-five studies were eligible, including 478 participants. RCTs targeting emotion perception and ToM produced a <i>small</i> effect (<i>g</i> = 0.38 (95%CI, 0.17, 0.59), <i>p</i> < .001). Observational studies targeting emotion perception and ToM produced a <i>small-medium</i> effect (SMD = 0.42 (95% CI 0.22, 0.61), <i>p</i> < .001). Interventions targeting empathy or alexithymia were limited. Our review provides initial evidence for the effectiveness of social-cognitive interventions targeting emotion perception and/or ToM. More research is needed to develop and evaluate interventions for other social-cognitive domains, including empathy and alexithymia.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2558883","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interventions targeting social cognition following moderate-to-severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) have shown some benefit, however, there remains a need to systematically review, statistically synthesize, and evaluate these interventions to inform the development of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Six databases were searched from inception to May 2024. Eligible studies targeted adults with a moderate-to-severe TBI (P); evaluated interventions targeting social cognition (I); compared to a control, baseline performance, or phase without treatment (C); based on objective social-cognitive ability/performance (O). Studies were screened by two independent reviewers. A random effects model estimated treatment effects for RCTs (Hedge's g) and observational (pre-post) studies (SMD) separately. Risk of bias was assessed. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Twenty-five studies were eligible, including 478 participants. RCTs targeting emotion perception and ToM produced a small effect (g = 0.38 (95%CI, 0.17, 0.59), p < .001). Observational studies targeting emotion perception and ToM produced a small-medium effect (SMD = 0.42 (95% CI 0.22, 0.61), p < .001). Interventions targeting empathy or alexithymia were limited. Our review provides initial evidence for the effectiveness of social-cognitive interventions targeting emotion perception and/or ToM. More research is needed to develop and evaluate interventions for other social-cognitive domains, including empathy and alexithymia.

中重度外伤性脑损伤后社会认知困难的治疗:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
针对中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后社会认知的干预措施已经显示出一些益处,然而,仍然需要系统地回顾、统计综合和评估这些干预措施,以便为临床实践指南的制定提供信息。从成立到2024年5月,对六个数据库进行了搜索。符合条件的研究针对的是中度至重度TBI (P)的成人;评估了针对社会认知的干预措施(I);与对照组、基线表现或未治疗阶段相比(C);基于客观社会认知能力/表现(O)。研究由两名独立评审员进行筛选。随机效应模型分别估计随机对照试验(Hedge’s g)和观察性(前后)研究(SMD)的治疗效果。评估偏倚风险。使用GRADE评价证据的确定性。25项研究符合条件,包括478名参与者。以情绪知觉和ToM为目标的rct产生了小效应(g = 0.38 (95%CI, 0.17, 0.59), p为中小型效应(SMD = 0.42 (95%CI, 0.22, 0.61), p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信