Association between the use of midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine and the incidence of delirium in elderly patients in intensive care units: a systematic review.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sao Paulo Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-10-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0311R1.14072025
Willian Setubal Dos Santos, Omar Carrión-Torres, Matheus Galvão Valadares Bertolini Mussalem, Vinicius Santos Baptista, Samira Yarak
{"title":"Association between the use of midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine and the incidence of delirium in elderly patients in intensive care units: a systematic review.","authors":"Willian Setubal Dos Santos, Omar Carrión-Torres, Matheus Galvão Valadares Bertolini Mussalem, Vinicius Santos Baptista, Samira Yarak","doi":"10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0311R1.14072025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium is a common and serious complication among elderly patients in intensive care units (ICUs), and is often associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates. The choice of sedoanalgesic may influence the incidence of delirium; however, the evidence remains unclear, particularly in the elderly population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the association between the use of different sedoanalgesics and the incidence of delirium in elderly ICU patients, based on data from randomized clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This systematic review was conducted using data from randomized clinical trials performed in various ICU settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases was performed in January 2024. The review included randomized clinical trials involving patients aged 60 years or older that examined the relationship between sedoanalgesics (midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine) and delirium incidence. Studies involving COVID-19 patients and non-randomized studies were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,331 patients from six studies were included. The mean age of the patients ranged from 71 to 74.7 years. Four studies compared dexmedetomidine with propofol; two found no significant difference in delirium incidence, whereas two suggested a lower incidence with dexmedetomidine. The remaining studies compared propofol with ketamine and dexmedetomidine with midazolam and showed no significant differences in the incidence of delirium.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dexmedetomidine may be associated with a lower incidence of delirium than propofol or midazolam in elderly ICU patients. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore the factors contributing to delirium in this population.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>Registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024575693, available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=575693.</p>","PeriodicalId":49574,"journal":{"name":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","volume":"143 6","pages":"e20240311"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0311R1.14072025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delirium is a common and serious complication among elderly patients in intensive care units (ICUs), and is often associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates. The choice of sedoanalgesic may influence the incidence of delirium; however, the evidence remains unclear, particularly in the elderly population.

Objectives: To evaluate the association between the use of different sedoanalgesics and the incidence of delirium in elderly ICU patients, based on data from randomized clinical trials.

Design and setting: This systematic review was conducted using data from randomized clinical trials performed in various ICU settings.

Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases was performed in January 2024. The review included randomized clinical trials involving patients aged 60 years or older that examined the relationship between sedoanalgesics (midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine) and delirium incidence. Studies involving COVID-19 patients and non-randomized studies were excluded.

Results: A total of 1,331 patients from six studies were included. The mean age of the patients ranged from 71 to 74.7 years. Four studies compared dexmedetomidine with propofol; two found no significant difference in delirium incidence, whereas two suggested a lower incidence with dexmedetomidine. The remaining studies compared propofol with ketamine and dexmedetomidine with midazolam and showed no significant differences in the incidence of delirium.

Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine may be associated with a lower incidence of delirium than propofol or midazolam in elderly ICU patients. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore the factors contributing to delirium in this population.

Systematic review registration: Registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024575693, available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=575693.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

重症监护病房老年患者使用咪达唑仑、芬太尼、异丙酚、氯胺酮和右美托咪定与谵妄发生率的关系:一项系统综述
背景:谵妄是重症监护病房(icu)老年患者常见且严重的并发症,通常与发病率和死亡率增加有关。镇静镇痛药的选择可能影响谵妄的发生;然而,证据尚不清楚,尤其是在老年人群中。目的:基于随机临床试验数据,评价老年ICU患者使用不同镇痛药与谵妄发生率之间的关系。设计和环境:本系统综述采用在不同ICU环境中进行的随机临床试验的数据。方法:于2024年1月对MEDLINE、Embase和CENTRAL数据库进行系统检索。本综述纳入了涉及60岁及以上患者的随机临床试验,这些试验检查了镇静镇痛药(咪达唑仑、芬太尼、异丙酚、氯胺酮和右美托咪定)与谵妄发生率之间的关系。排除了涉及COVID-19患者的研究和非随机研究。结果:6项研究共纳入1331例患者。患者平均年龄71 ~ 74.7岁。四项研究比较了右美托咪定和异丙酚;两组发现谵妄发生率无显著差异,而两组提示右美托咪定发生率较低。其余的研究将异丙酚与氯胺酮、右美托咪定与咪达唑仑进行比较,发现谵妄的发生率没有显著差异。结论:右美托咪定与老年ICU患者谵妄发生率较异丙酚或咪达唑仑低有关。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现,并探索导致这一人群谵妄的因素。系统评价注册:在PROSPERO注册,CRD42024575693,可在https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=575693上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sao Paulo Medical Journal
Sao Paulo Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published bimonthly by the Associação Paulista de Medicina, the journal accepts articles in the fields of clinical health science (internal medicine, gynecology and obstetrics, mental health, surgery, pediatrics and public health). Articles will be accepted in the form of original articles (clinical trials, cohort, case-control, prevalence, incidence, accuracy and cost-effectiveness studies and systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis), narrative reviews of the literature, case reports, short communications and letters to the editor. Papers with a commercial objective will not be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信