A meta-analysis of the correlation between carbapenem antibiotic use and the incidence of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Cheng Tang, Yaosheng Mei, Hang Fang, Wei Wang, Meiyan Lv
{"title":"A meta-analysis of the correlation between carbapenem antibiotic use and the incidence of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.","authors":"Cheng Tang, Yaosheng Mei, Hang Fang, Wei Wang, Meiyan Lv","doi":"10.3855/jidc.20950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluates the correlation between carbapenem antibiotic use and the incidence of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A comprehensive literature search conducted across multiple databases yielded seven clinical experimental studies involving 4,417 patients. The primary outcomes assessed were the risk factors associated with CRPA infection, drug resistance rates, and the comparison of resistance rates between meropenem (MEM) and imipenem (IPM). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study quality, and Egger's test and funnel plots were used to assess publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NOS scores for the included studies ranged between 6 and 8, indicating their generally high quality. The analysis indicated that prior carbapenem use significantly increased the risk of CRPA infection (OR = 1.866, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.164-2.993, p = 0.010). The drug resistance rates of P. aeruginosa to carbapenems ranged between 21.07% and 37.90%. There was no significant difference in drug resistance rates between MEM and IPM (risk ratio = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.99-1.21, p = 0.517).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With drug resistance rates between 21.07% and 37.90%, these findings suggest that carbapenem use is associated with an increased risk of CRPA infection, highlighting the need for the judicious use of these antibiotics in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","volume":"19 9","pages":"1377-1383"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.20950","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This meta-analysis evaluates the correlation between carbapenem antibiotic use and the incidence of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA).

Methodology: A comprehensive literature search conducted across multiple databases yielded seven clinical experimental studies involving 4,417 patients. The primary outcomes assessed were the risk factors associated with CRPA infection, drug resistance rates, and the comparison of resistance rates between meropenem (MEM) and imipenem (IPM). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study quality, and Egger's test and funnel plots were used to assess publication bias.

Results: The NOS scores for the included studies ranged between 6 and 8, indicating their generally high quality. The analysis indicated that prior carbapenem use significantly increased the risk of CRPA infection (OR = 1.866, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.164-2.993, p = 0.010). The drug resistance rates of P. aeruginosa to carbapenems ranged between 21.07% and 37.90%. There was no significant difference in drug resistance rates between MEM and IPM (risk ratio = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.99-1.21, p = 0.517).

Conclusions: With drug resistance rates between 21.07% and 37.90%, these findings suggest that carbapenem use is associated with an increased risk of CRPA infection, highlighting the need for the judicious use of these antibiotics in clinical practice.

碳青霉烯类抗生素使用与耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌发病率相关性的meta分析。
本meta分析评估了碳青霉烯类抗生素使用与耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌(CRPA)发生率之间的相关性。方法:在多个数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,获得了涉及4,417例患者的7项临床实验研究。评估的主要结局是与CRPA感染相关的危险因素、耐药率以及美罗培南(MEM)和亚胺培南(IPM)的耐药率比较。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评价研究质量,采用Egger检验和漏斗图评价发表偏倚。结果:纳入研究的NOS评分在6 ~ 8分之间,总体质量较高。分析表明,既往使用碳青霉烯类药物显著增加CRPA感染的风险(OR = 1.866, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.164 ~ 2.993, p = 0.010)。铜绿假单胞菌对碳青霉烯类药物的耐药率为21.07% ~ 37.90%。MEM与IPM的耐药率差异无统计学意义(风险比= 1.09,95% CI: 0.99 ~ 1.21, p = 0.517)。结论:碳青霉烯类抗生素的耐药率在21.07% ~ 37.90%之间,提示碳青霉烯类抗生素的使用与CRPA感染风险增加有关,在临床实践中需要明智地使用这些抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
239
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries (JIDC) is an international journal, intended for the publication of scientific articles from Developing Countries by scientists from Developing Countries. JIDC is an independent, on-line publication with an international editorial board. JIDC is open access with no cost to view or download articles and reasonable cost for publication of research artcles, making JIDC easily availiable to scientists from resource restricted regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信