Superiority of ultra-shortterm clinical outcome after minimally invasive distal metatarsal chevron osteotomy in comparison to the open technique: a prospective study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Viktoria Hofmann, Gerhard Kaufmann, Michael Liebensteiner, Franz Endstrasser, Moritz Wagner, Hanno Ulmer, Luke Cicchinelli
{"title":"Superiority of ultra-shortterm clinical outcome after minimally invasive distal metatarsal chevron osteotomy in comparison to the open technique: a prospective study.","authors":"Viktoria Hofmann, Gerhard Kaufmann, Michael Liebensteiner, Franz Endstrasser, Moritz Wagner, Hanno Ulmer, Luke Cicchinelli","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Swelling and pain is a frequent finding after hallux valgus correction. Aim of our study was to detect clinical differences in the initial postoperative period after minimally invasive chevron osteotomy (MIS) and the open chevron technique (OC). From the included patients clinical outcome was assessed preoperatively, and then at two, four, six and 12 weeks postopertively in terms of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) forefoot Score, the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal Scale, the Maryland Foot Score (MFS), the SF12 Life Quality Scale, the Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) of pain, swelling of the foot, range of motion (ROM) and patient satisfaction. Radiographic parameters were taken preoperatively, as well as two, six and twelve weeks after surgery. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was recorded preoperatively only, pain medication consumption was documented for the intial two weeks after surgery. Sixty-three feet were analyzed (33 MIS; 30 OC). Patient demographic characteristics and amount of the deformity in both groups did not differ significantly. Both techniques demonstrated good radiographic correction of the hallux deformity without superiority of one technique. We detected lower pain levels and reduced pain medication consumption as well as reduced swelling in the MIS group at the time points two, four and six weeks postoperatively. AOFAS score and the satisfaction score showed significantly better results in the MIS group as well. Minimally invasive chevron osteotomy shows better clinical ultra-shortterm outcome and lower pain levels in comparision to the open technique with comparable radiographic results.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.08.013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Swelling and pain is a frequent finding after hallux valgus correction. Aim of our study was to detect clinical differences in the initial postoperative period after minimally invasive chevron osteotomy (MIS) and the open chevron technique (OC). From the included patients clinical outcome was assessed preoperatively, and then at two, four, six and 12 weeks postopertively in terms of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) forefoot Score, the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal Scale, the Maryland Foot Score (MFS), the SF12 Life Quality Scale, the Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) of pain, swelling of the foot, range of motion (ROM) and patient satisfaction. Radiographic parameters were taken preoperatively, as well as two, six and twelve weeks after surgery. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was recorded preoperatively only, pain medication consumption was documented for the intial two weeks after surgery. Sixty-three feet were analyzed (33 MIS; 30 OC). Patient demographic characteristics and amount of the deformity in both groups did not differ significantly. Both techniques demonstrated good radiographic correction of the hallux deformity without superiority of one technique. We detected lower pain levels and reduced pain medication consumption as well as reduced swelling in the MIS group at the time points two, four and six weeks postoperatively. AOFAS score and the satisfaction score showed significantly better results in the MIS group as well. Minimally invasive chevron osteotomy shows better clinical ultra-shortterm outcome and lower pain levels in comparision to the open technique with comparable radiographic results.

一项前瞻性研究:微创远端跖骨截骨术与开放技术相比超短期临床疗效的优势。
肿胀和疼痛是拇外翻矫正后常见的症状。我们的研究目的是检测微创颅角截骨术(MIS)和开放颅角截骨术(OC)术后初期的临床差异。对入选患者进行术前、术后2周、4周、6周和12周的临床结果评估,分别采用美国骨科足踝学会(AOFAS)前足评分、日本足外科学会(JSSF)跖趾-指间量表、马里兰足部评分(MFS)、SF12生活质量量表、疼痛、足部肿胀、活动范围(ROM)和患者满意度的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。术前、术后2周、6周和12周分别测量影像学参数。术前仅记录Charlson合并症指数(CCI),术后最初两周记录止痛药的使用情况。分析了63英尺(33 MIS; 30 OC)。两组患者的人口学特征和畸形数量无显著差异。两种技术均表现出良好的拇畸形x线矫正效果,没有任何一种技术的优势。我们在术后2周、4周和6周的时间点检测到MIS组疼痛水平降低,止痛药用量减少,肿胀减轻。MIS组患者的AOFAS评分和满意度评分均显著高于MIS组。与具有相似影像学结果的开放式技术相比,微创chevron截骨术具有更好的临床超短期疗效和更低的疼痛水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信