A Bilateral Comparison of Lower Limb Strength and Pirouette Performance in Elite Female Dancers.

IF 1.5 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Dance Medicine & Science Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-09 DOI:10.1177/1089313X251375823
Emma K Cullen, Penny E Hudson, Neal A Smith
{"title":"A Bilateral Comparison of Lower Limb Strength and Pirouette Performance in Elite Female Dancers.","authors":"Emma K Cullen, Penny E Hudson, Neal A Smith","doi":"10.1177/1089313X251375823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Traditional dance training is designed to develop a well-balanced dancer, yet laterality has the ability to impair bilateral strength and functional symmetry. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of lateral preference on elite level dancers by conducting a bilateral comparison of lower limb strength and pirouette performance. A <i>pirouette</i> is an essential turning skill in dance technique, wherein multiple revolutions are completed on a single supporting leg along the longitudinal axis. <b>Methods:</b> Eight highly trained female dancers performed three maximal effort single leg countermovement jumps (SCMJ) on each lower limb, as well as ten single pirouette en dehors in both the preferred and non-preferred directions. <b>Results:</b> A lateral preference questionnaire indicated a rightward bias was prevalent amongst this group of dancers for both footedness and preferred turning direction. Significantly more successful pirouettes were performed in the preferred (73%) compared to the non-preferred condition (50%). The SCMJ data demonstrated no significant differences in jump height and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) at take-off, suggesting no bilateral strength asymmetry between the lower limbs. There were also no significant differences in any of the discrete biomechanical pirouette performance variables: displacement of the center of mass over center of pressure (COM-COP), trunk angle, knee flexion and external hip rotation of the gesture leg in retiré position, as well as GRF production and peak pelvic rotational angular velocity at push-off. However, non-significant trends toward greater COM-COP displacement at retiré (0.08 m ± 0.03 vs 0.06 m ± 0.04) and peak pelvic angular velocity at push-off (1.04 revs/s ± 0.20 vs 0.99 revs/s ± 0.22) were observed in the non-preferred compared to the preferred direction, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> Therefore, the lower success rate of non-preferred pirouettes may be a result of postural instability or the use of a less efficient weight transfer strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","volume":" ","pages":"363-371"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X251375823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Traditional dance training is designed to develop a well-balanced dancer, yet laterality has the ability to impair bilateral strength and functional symmetry. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of lateral preference on elite level dancers by conducting a bilateral comparison of lower limb strength and pirouette performance. A pirouette is an essential turning skill in dance technique, wherein multiple revolutions are completed on a single supporting leg along the longitudinal axis. Methods: Eight highly trained female dancers performed three maximal effort single leg countermovement jumps (SCMJ) on each lower limb, as well as ten single pirouette en dehors in both the preferred and non-preferred directions. Results: A lateral preference questionnaire indicated a rightward bias was prevalent amongst this group of dancers for both footedness and preferred turning direction. Significantly more successful pirouettes were performed in the preferred (73%) compared to the non-preferred condition (50%). The SCMJ data demonstrated no significant differences in jump height and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) at take-off, suggesting no bilateral strength asymmetry between the lower limbs. There were also no significant differences in any of the discrete biomechanical pirouette performance variables: displacement of the center of mass over center of pressure (COM-COP), trunk angle, knee flexion and external hip rotation of the gesture leg in retiré position, as well as GRF production and peak pelvic rotational angular velocity at push-off. However, non-significant trends toward greater COM-COP displacement at retiré (0.08 m ± 0.03 vs 0.06 m ± 0.04) and peak pelvic angular velocity at push-off (1.04 revs/s ± 0.20 vs 0.99 revs/s ± 0.22) were observed in the non-preferred compared to the preferred direction, respectively. Conclusion: Therefore, the lower success rate of non-preferred pirouettes may be a result of postural instability or the use of a less efficient weight transfer strategy.

优秀女舞者下肢力量与脚尖旋转表演的双边比较。
简介:传统的舞蹈训练旨在培养一个平衡良好的舞者,然而侧边有可能损害双边力量和功能对称性。本研究的目的是通过进行下肢力量和脚尖旋转表演的双边比较,探讨侧向偏好对精英水平舞者的影响。脚尖旋转是舞蹈技术中必不可少的一项转身技巧,其中在一条支撑腿上沿纵轴完成多次旋转。方法:8名训练有素的女舞者分别在每条下肢进行3次最大力度单腿反动作跳跃(SCMJ),并在偏好和非偏好方向上进行10次单脚旋转(10小时)。结果:横向偏好问卷显示,在这组舞者中,对脚和偏好的转向方向都普遍存在向右偏倚。与非首选条件(50%)相比,在首选条件下(73%)进行了更成功的旋转。SCMJ数据显示,起跳高度和垂直地面反作用力(vGRF)无显著差异,表明双侧下肢之间没有力量不对称。在任何离散的生物力学单脚旋转性能变量上也没有显著差异:质心相对压力中心的位移(COM-COP),躯干角度,膝关节屈曲和退位姿势腿的髋外旋转,以及推离时GRF产生和骨盆旋转角速度峰值。然而,与首选方向相比,非首选方向在退役时COM-COP位移(0.08 m±0.03 vs 0.06 m±0.04)和推离时骨盆峰值角速度(1.04转速/秒±0.20 vs 0.99转速/秒±0.22)方面分别观察到不显著的趋势。结论:因此,非首选旋转成功率较低可能是由于姿势不稳定或使用效率较低的重量转移策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书