Examining tobacco-control enforcement in Ireland 2014-2023: an observational study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
F Houghton, J Lombard
{"title":"Examining tobacco-control enforcement in Ireland 2014-2023: an observational study.","authors":"F Houghton, J Lombard","doi":"10.1177/17579139251371974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Smoking continues to pose a significant threat to health and well-being in Ireland. However, concerns have been raised about the enforcement of public health legislation in Ireland. The WHO has noted that enforcement of tobacco-control legislation is a vital factor in reducing tobacco-related harm. This research therefore sought to explore convictions, penalties, and associated costs imposed in the period 2014-2023 under various sections of the <i>Public Health (Tobacco) Act 2002</i> as amended.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article is based on secondary descriptive statistical analysis of tobacco conviction data released annually by the Health Service Executive's (HSE) National Environmental Health Service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 1900 inspections annually identify evidence of non-compliance with tobacco-control legislation. Convictions for non-compliance are rare, with 1.12% of instances of non-compliance resulting in a conviction. In total, 93.1% of fines and 85.5% of costs charged were for sums of €1500 or less. Convictions under the tobacco-control legislation resulting in a 1-day ban or less on tobacco sales occurred in 56.9% of convictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The penalties imposed, which are at judicial discretion, are routinely far below the maximum possible under the Acts. The introduction of fixed penalty notices is recommended, as well as the re-introduction of minimum periods of removal from the Tobacco Retail Register to prohibit tobacco sales. The low level of enforcement and minimal penalties imposed undermine tobacco control in Ireland.</p>","PeriodicalId":47256,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"17579139251371974"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17579139251371974","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Smoking continues to pose a significant threat to health and well-being in Ireland. However, concerns have been raised about the enforcement of public health legislation in Ireland. The WHO has noted that enforcement of tobacco-control legislation is a vital factor in reducing tobacco-related harm. This research therefore sought to explore convictions, penalties, and associated costs imposed in the period 2014-2023 under various sections of the Public Health (Tobacco) Act 2002 as amended.

Method: This article is based on secondary descriptive statistical analysis of tobacco conviction data released annually by the Health Service Executive's (HSE) National Environmental Health Service.

Results: Over 1900 inspections annually identify evidence of non-compliance with tobacco-control legislation. Convictions for non-compliance are rare, with 1.12% of instances of non-compliance resulting in a conviction. In total, 93.1% of fines and 85.5% of costs charged were for sums of €1500 or less. Convictions under the tobacco-control legislation resulting in a 1-day ban or less on tobacco sales occurred in 56.9% of convictions.

Conclusion: The penalties imposed, which are at judicial discretion, are routinely far below the maximum possible under the Acts. The introduction of fixed penalty notices is recommended, as well as the re-introduction of minimum periods of removal from the Tobacco Retail Register to prohibit tobacco sales. The low level of enforcement and minimal penalties imposed undermine tobacco control in Ireland.

检查2014-2023年爱尔兰烟草控制执法:一项观察性研究。
目的:吸烟继续对爱尔兰的健康和福祉构成重大威胁。然而,有人对爱尔兰公共卫生立法的执行情况表示关切。世卫组织指出,执行烟草控制立法是减少烟草相关危害的关键因素。因此,本研究试图探讨2014-2023年期间根据经修订的《2002年公共卫生(烟草)法》各章节实施的定罪、处罚和相关费用。方法:本文基于卫生服务执行(HSE)国家环境卫生服务每年发布的烟草定罪数据的二次描述性统计分析。结果:每年进行1900多次检查,查明不遵守烟草控制立法的证据。对违规行为的定罪非常罕见,只有1.12%的违规行为被定罪。总的来说,93.1%的罚款和85.5%的费用是针对1500欧元或以下的金额。56.9%的人因烟草管制法例而被定罪,导致烟草销售被禁售1天或更短时间。结论:所施加的惩罚是由司法酌情决定的,通常远远低于《法律》规定的最高可能。建议引入固定罚款通知,并重新引入从烟草零售登记册中删除的最低期限,以禁止烟草销售。低水平的执法和最小的惩罚破坏了爱尔兰的烟草控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives in Public Health
Perspectives in Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Public Health is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal. It is practice orientated and features current topics and opinions; news and views on current health issues; case studies; book reviews; letters to the Editor; as well as updates on the Society"s work. The journal also commissions articles for themed issues and publishes original peer-reviewed articles. Perspectives in Public Health"s primary aim is to be an invaluable resource for the Society"s members, who are health-promoting professionals from many disciplines, including environmental health, health protection, health and safety, food safety and nutrition, building and engineering, primary care, academia and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信