Combination of indocyanine green with medical adhesive for preoperative pulmonary nodule localization.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Yulong Tan, Wenhao Wang, Xuan Wang, Baosen Wen, Haoxin Liu, Yifeng Qian, Quandong Zhu, Xiaofeng Chen, Huijun Zhang
{"title":"Combination of indocyanine green with medical adhesive for preoperative pulmonary nodule localization.","authors":"Yulong Tan, Wenhao Wang, Xuan Wang, Baosen Wen, Haoxin Liu, Yifeng Qian, Quandong Zhu, Xiaofeng Chen, Huijun Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12957-025-04021-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative localization of pulmonary nodules is crucial for sublobar resection under thoracoscopy; however, controversy persists over the optimal localization method in terms of accuracy and safety. This study evaluates a novel technique integrating indocyanine green (ICG) with medical adhesive for pulmonary nodule localization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective cohort, 168 consecutive patients (188 pulmonary nodules ≤ 2 cm) undergoing preoperative localization followed by uniportal thoracoscopic resection (July 2023 to June 2024) were divided into two groups: ICG combined with medical adhesive group (n = 86) versus medical adhesive group (n = 82). Localization outcomes, related complications, surgical and pathological outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no deaths or serious complications. All nodules were successfully resected thoracoscopically. The combined group demonstrated a shorter operative duration than the medical adhesive group (46.3 ± 6.7 min vs. 53.1 ± 5.9 min, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were identified in surgical type, length of stay, duration of drain tube retention, and total postoperative drainage volume between the two groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined use of ICG and medical adhesive for preoperative localization in uniportal thoracoscopic sublobar resection of small pulmonary nodules reduces operative time compared with medical adhesive positioning and demonstrates favorable safety profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-04021-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preoperative localization of pulmonary nodules is crucial for sublobar resection under thoracoscopy; however, controversy persists over the optimal localization method in terms of accuracy and safety. This study evaluates a novel technique integrating indocyanine green (ICG) with medical adhesive for pulmonary nodule localization.

Materials and methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort, 168 consecutive patients (188 pulmonary nodules ≤ 2 cm) undergoing preoperative localization followed by uniportal thoracoscopic resection (July 2023 to June 2024) were divided into two groups: ICG combined with medical adhesive group (n = 86) versus medical adhesive group (n = 82). Localization outcomes, related complications, surgical and pathological outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results: There were no deaths or serious complications. All nodules were successfully resected thoracoscopically. The combined group demonstrated a shorter operative duration than the medical adhesive group (46.3 ± 6.7 min vs. 53.1 ± 5.9 min, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were identified in surgical type, length of stay, duration of drain tube retention, and total postoperative drainage volume between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The combined use of ICG and medical adhesive for preoperative localization in uniportal thoracoscopic sublobar resection of small pulmonary nodules reduces operative time compared with medical adhesive positioning and demonstrates favorable safety profiles.

吲哚菁绿与医用胶联合应用于术前肺结节定位。
背景:胸腔镜下肺结节术前定位是肺叶下切除术的关键;然而,最优定位方法在准确性和安全性方面仍存在争议。本研究评估了一种将吲哚菁绿(ICG)与医用粘合剂结合用于肺结节定位的新技术。材料与方法:本研究为单中心回顾性队列研究,将2023年7月至2024年6月连续168例(188例≤2 cm)行术前定位并单门胸腔镜切除的患者分为ICG联合医用胶组(n = 86)和医用胶组(n = 82)。比较两组的定位结果、相关并发症、手术及病理结果。结果:无死亡,无严重并发症。所有结节均经胸腔镜成功切除。联合组手术时间短于医用粘胶组(46.3±6.7 min vs 53.1±5.9 min, P < 0.05)。结论:ICG联合医用粘胶在单门胸腔镜肺叶下小结节切除术中的术前定位较医用粘胶定位缩短了手术时间,安全性较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信