Association of Office and 24-Hour Ambulatory Measurement of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity with Target Organ Damage in Hypertension.

IF 7.3 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Pulse Pub Date : 2025-07-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000547443
Huijuan Chao, Qian Wang, Biwen Tang, Yaya Bai, Shenshen Gao, Mark Butlin, Alberto P Avolio, Junli Zuo
{"title":"Association of Office and 24-Hour Ambulatory Measurement of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity with Target Organ Damage in Hypertension.","authors":"Huijuan Chao, Qian Wang, Biwen Tang, Yaya Bai, Shenshen Gao, Mark Butlin, Alberto P Avolio, Junli Zuo","doi":"10.1159/000547443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the association of office arterial stiffness and 24 h arterial stiffness as measured by pulse wave velocity (PWV) with subclinical target organ damage (TOD) in a hypertensive cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated associations of TOD with office carotid-femoral PWV (cf-PWV) by radial tonometry (SphygmoCor) and 24-h ambulatory PWV measurements by brachial oscillometry (Mobil-O-Graph 24-h PWA Monitor) in 636 hospital inpatients (age 54 ± 13 years, 465 males) with primary hypertension. Subclinical TOD was assessed as left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) obtained by echocardiography quantified by LV mass index (LVMI), carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) >0.9 mm and chronic kidney disease including urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) >3.5 mg/mmol in females and >2.5 mg/mmol in males or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min per 1.73 m<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for confounding factors, both cf-PWV and 24-h PWV or night-PWV showed significant association with LVMI (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Only day-PWV was associated with eGFR (<i>p</i> = 0.037). When cf-PWV, 24-h PWV, day- and night-PWV including confounding factors were forced into the same logistic regression model, only cf-PWV (OR = 1.109 [1.001-1.228], <i>p</i> = 0.033) remained a significant determinant of increased LVH. Day-PWV (OR = 0.538 [0.415-0.696], <i>p</i> < 0.001) was significantly correlated with eGFR. For ACR, each 1 m/s increase in day-PWV was associated with risk of increased ACR (OR = 1.685 [1.178-2.410], <i>p</i> = 0.004). For CIMT >0.9 mm, neither ambulatory PWV nor cf-PWV was significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with 24-h ambulatory PWV, cf-PWV has a better correlation with LVH, while ambulatory PWV has a greater correlation with the decline in renal function.</p>","PeriodicalId":29774,"journal":{"name":"Pulse","volume":"13 1","pages":"108-120"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the association of office arterial stiffness and 24 h arterial stiffness as measured by pulse wave velocity (PWV) with subclinical target organ damage (TOD) in a hypertensive cohort.

Methods: We evaluated associations of TOD with office carotid-femoral PWV (cf-PWV) by radial tonometry (SphygmoCor) and 24-h ambulatory PWV measurements by brachial oscillometry (Mobil-O-Graph 24-h PWA Monitor) in 636 hospital inpatients (age 54 ± 13 years, 465 males) with primary hypertension. Subclinical TOD was assessed as left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) obtained by echocardiography quantified by LV mass index (LVMI), carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) >0.9 mm and chronic kidney disease including urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) >3.5 mg/mmol in females and >2.5 mg/mmol in males or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2.

Results: After adjusting for confounding factors, both cf-PWV and 24-h PWV or night-PWV showed significant association with LVMI (p < 0.05). Only day-PWV was associated with eGFR (p = 0.037). When cf-PWV, 24-h PWV, day- and night-PWV including confounding factors were forced into the same logistic regression model, only cf-PWV (OR = 1.109 [1.001-1.228], p = 0.033) remained a significant determinant of increased LVH. Day-PWV (OR = 0.538 [0.415-0.696], p < 0.001) was significantly correlated with eGFR. For ACR, each 1 m/s increase in day-PWV was associated with risk of increased ACR (OR = 1.685 [1.178-2.410], p = 0.004). For CIMT >0.9 mm, neither ambulatory PWV nor cf-PWV was significant.

Conclusion: Compared with 24-h ambulatory PWV, cf-PWV has a better correlation with LVH, while ambulatory PWV has a greater correlation with the decline in renal function.

办公室和24小时动态测量高血压患者主动脉脉搏波速度与靶器官损害的关系。
简介:本研究的目的是评估高血压队列中办公室动脉硬度和24小时动脉硬度(通过脉搏波速度(PWV)测量)与亚临床靶器官损伤(TOD)的关系。方法:我们对636例原发性高血压住院患者(年龄54±13岁,男性465例)采用桡动脉血压计(sphygmoor)和24小时动态PWV (mobilo - graph 24小时PWA监测仪)评估TOD与办公室颈-股动脉PWV (cf-PWV)的关系。以左室质量指数(LVMI)、颈动脉内膜-中膜厚度(CIMT) >0.9 mm和慢性肾脏疾病(包括尿白蛋白-肌酐比(ACR) >3.5 mg/mmol(女性)和>2.5 mg/mmol(男性)或肾小球滤过率(eGFR)估算2)来评估亚临床TOD。结果:校正混杂因素后,cf-PWV、24小时PWV、夜间PWV与LVMI均有显著相关性(p < 0.05)。只有day-PWV与eGFR相关(p = 0.037)。当cf-PWV、24小时PWV、白天和夜间PWV包括混杂因素纳入同一逻辑回归模型时,只有cf-PWV (OR = 1.109 [1.001-1.228], p = 0.033)仍然是LVH升高的显著决定因素。Day-PWV (OR = 0.538 [0.415-0.696], p < 0.001)与eGFR显著相关。对于ACR,日pwv每增加1 m/s与ACR增加的风险相关(OR = 1.685 [1.178-2.410], p = 0.004)。对于CIMT >0.9 mm,动态PWV和cf-PWV均不显著。结论:与24 h动态PWV相比,cf-PWV与LVH的相关性更好,而动态PWV与肾功能下降的相关性更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
4.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信