Evaluating Scarring Alopecia Therapies from the Patient Perspective: Knowledge, Barriers to Care, and Treatment Satisfaction.

IF 1.3 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Anna Brinks, Caitlin Kearney, Carli Needle, Akshay Pulavarty, Jerry Shapiro, Kristen I Lo Sicco
{"title":"Evaluating Scarring Alopecia Therapies from the Patient Perspective: Knowledge, Barriers to Care, and Treatment Satisfaction.","authors":"Anna Brinks, Caitlin Kearney, Carli Needle, Akshay Pulavarty, Jerry Shapiro, Kristen I Lo Sicco","doi":"10.1159/000547557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Scarring alopecias (SAs) cause permanent hair loss and psychological distress. With no FDA-approved SA treatments, patients face significant barriers to care. Despite promising evidence supporting the use of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) to treat SAs, access remains limited. This study aimed to assess the demographic profile, psychosocial burden, treatment experiences, and barriers to care among patients with SA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An IRB-approved online survey was distributed to adults (≥18 years) with a self-reported SA diagnosis via the Scarring Alopecia Foundation (SAF) listserv and at the April 2025 SAF Conference. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U tests and χ<sup>2</sup> tests were performed using SAS v9.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 294 respondents (98.0% female, mean age 61, 81.3% White), common diagnoses included frontal fibrosing alopecia (66.3%), lichen planopilaris (41.5%), and central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (12.6%). Only 37.5% reported well-controlled symptoms; 78.9% experienced SA-related depression or anxiety. JAKi awareness was high (71%), but use was low (30%), with significant differences based on gender, region, income, and education. Barriers to treatment access included provider reluctance (46%), insurance denial (18%), and high cost (16%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SA patients face significant psychosocial distress and barriers to accessing therapies. Improving equitable access to care requires enhanced provider education, broader insurance coverage, and stronger patient assistance programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21844,"journal":{"name":"Skin Appendage Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin Appendage Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Scarring alopecias (SAs) cause permanent hair loss and psychological distress. With no FDA-approved SA treatments, patients face significant barriers to care. Despite promising evidence supporting the use of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) to treat SAs, access remains limited. This study aimed to assess the demographic profile, psychosocial burden, treatment experiences, and barriers to care among patients with SA.

Methods: An IRB-approved online survey was distributed to adults (≥18 years) with a self-reported SA diagnosis via the Scarring Alopecia Foundation (SAF) listserv and at the April 2025 SAF Conference. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U tests and χ2 tests were performed using SAS v9.4.

Results: Among 294 respondents (98.0% female, mean age 61, 81.3% White), common diagnoses included frontal fibrosing alopecia (66.3%), lichen planopilaris (41.5%), and central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (12.6%). Only 37.5% reported well-controlled symptoms; 78.9% experienced SA-related depression or anxiety. JAKi awareness was high (71%), but use was low (30%), with significant differences based on gender, region, income, and education. Barriers to treatment access included provider reluctance (46%), insurance denial (18%), and high cost (16%).

Conclusions: SA patients face significant psychosocial distress and barriers to accessing therapies. Improving equitable access to care requires enhanced provider education, broader insurance coverage, and stronger patient assistance programs.

从患者角度评估瘢痕性脱发治疗:知识、护理障碍和治疗满意度。
导读:瘢痕性脱发(SAs)会导致永久性脱发和心理困扰。由于没有fda批准的SA治疗,患者面临着重大的护理障碍。尽管有很好的证据支持使用Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKi)治疗SAs,但可及性仍然有限。本研究旨在评估SA患者的人口统计学特征、心理社会负担、治疗经历和护理障碍。方法:通过瘢痕性脱发基金会(SAF)列表服务和2025年4月的SAF会议,向自我报告SA诊断的成人(≥18岁)分发irb批准的在线调查。使用SAS v9.4进行Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U检验和χ2检验。结果:294名受访患者(女性98.0%,平均年龄61岁,白人81.3%),常见诊断为额部纤维化性脱发(66.3%)、扁平苔藓(41.5%)和中央离心性瘢痕性脱发(12.6%)。只有37.5%的人报告症状得到良好控制;78.9%经历过sa相关的抑郁或焦虑。日本人对JAKi的认知度很高(71%),但使用率很低(30%),性别、地区、收入和教育程度存在显著差异。获得治疗的障碍包括提供者不愿意(46%)、拒绝保险(18%)和高费用(16%)。结论:SA患者面临显著的社会心理困扰和获得治疗的障碍。提高公平获得医疗服务的机会,需要加强医疗服务提供者的教育,扩大保险覆盖范围,并加强患者援助计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信